WPC/ 2MB%RK<3|aTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldP\  P6Q9XP#"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxdTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman Italic\&P2gE ZX X-#XP\  P6Q9XP#HP4M (PCL) (Additional); Local PrintHL4MPCAD.PRSXj\  P6G;\"\XP|D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd&7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XP'2a=5,&a\  P6G;&P(2e=5,&e4  pG;&\0_=5,%&_*f9 xr G;&X2 KZ <N 3|a"i~'^5>I\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\33gggQyyrg>Frgygrr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>>>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\pBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\HP LaserJet 5Si Room 907HPLAS5SI.PRSXj\  P6G;\{$Q_XPTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman Italic2  vpy S' I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#Xj\  P6G;9XP##&a\  P6G;&P#\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\nBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\ S' I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#Xj\  P6G;ynXP##&a\  P6G;u&P#a8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . 2 kkva6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` 2t> L BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  2  t )a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# 2[a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  2Ia5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   2"a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . 2%3 e$d%Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:Right Par 7Right Par 7/` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Right Par 8Right Par 80` hp x (#X` hp x (#0X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Document 1Document 11` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 5Technical 52` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#2E3$@4lB5l6C6$CTechnical 6Technical 63` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 2Technical 24 Technical 3Technical 35 Technical 4Technical 46` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#2L7lE8$dF9$H:JTechnical 1Technical 17 Technical 7Technical 78` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 8Technical 89` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#toc 1toc 1:` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#2tU;L<O=8Q>VStoc 2toc 2;` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#toc 3toc 3<` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#toc 4toc 4=` hp x (# !(#  !(# ` hp x (#toc 5toc 5>` hp x (#h!(# h!(# ` hp x (#2v\?U@vWA:XBXZtoc 6toc 6?` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 7toc 7@ toc 8toc 8A` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 9toc 9B` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#2xcC\D^E`Fvcindex 1index 1C` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#index 2index 2D` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#toatoaE` hp x (#!(# !(# ` hp x (#captioncaptionF 2eGlcHrdIdJ}e_Equation Caption_Equation CaptionG endnote referenceendnote referenceH head1 #I'd#2p}wC@ #a1Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfJ$ 2hKeL>fMfNoga2Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfK/` ` ` a3Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfL:` ` `  a4Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfME` ` `  a5Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfNP  ` ` ` hhh 2lOJhPhQiKja6Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfO[   a7Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfPf  a8Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfQq "i~'^5>g\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>ggg\yyrF\yrgyy>3>j\>\gQgQ>\g3>g3g\ggQF>g\\\QI(I_>0_j>>>0>>>>>>\>g3\\\\\QyQyQyQyQD3D3D3D3g\\\\gggg\\g\\\\pg\\\QQ_QyQyQyQyQ\\\_\gjF3FgF>Fgg__gy3ySy>yIy3ggg\\QQQgFgFgFg_y^y>yjgggggg_yQyQyQgy>ggFy>\0\\=2=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBa\>\\\\\\7>\7>\7>>\\\??n\\pBnnBsgg>\\7"yyyy\nlc\gnn\20vKmKOoKqKs"i~'^5>M\\>>>\}0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>}}}\rryrr>Qygyrr\grrggF3FM\>\\Q\Q3\\33Q3\\\\FF3\QyQQFI3Ic>0cM>>>0>>>>>>\>\3r\r\r\r\r\yyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3y\\\\\\\\\gQr\\\\gQ\r\r\r\r\yQyQycyQnrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\\ccyQg3gBg>g;g3y\jy\y\\\yrFrFrF\F\F\FccgBg3gM\\\\\\ygcgFgFgF\g>y\\Fg>g\n0\\=(=WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNBnnB_\F\\\\\\3;\7;\7>>gg\??n\\pBnnBb\\>g\7"yyyy\njc\}nn\"i~'^09CSS999S]+9+/SSSSSSSSSS//]]]Ixnnxg]xx9?xgxx]xn]gxxxxg9/9MS9ISISI9SS//S/SSSS9?/SSxSSIP!PZ9+ZM999+99999999S/xIxIxIxIxIlnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxIxSxRxSxSxS]SxIxIxInInInZnIxigIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999Su]ZZxSg/gCg9g9g/xSbxSxSxSxSxn9n9n9]?]?]?]ZgFg/gMxSxSxSxSxSxSxxZgIgIgIxSg9xS]?g9xSi+SS88WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN%7777777777>>>0eOIIOD>OO%*ODaOO>OI>DOOgOOD%%37%07070%777V7777%*77O77055;%;3%%%%%%%%%%%7O0O0O0O0O0aHI0D0D0D0D0%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O0O7O6O7O7O7>7O0O0O0I0I0I;I0OED0D0D0D0O7O7O7O;O7O;O7%%7%%%7M>;;O7DD,D%D%DO7AO7O7O7O7aOI%I%I%>*>*>*>;D.DD3O7O7O7O7O7O7gOO;D0D0D0O7D%O7>*D%O7E77%%WMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN(BB(37%07777j7#TT7!#TT7T!%%007n&&Bn77lCTn(nBB(A\\>>n%07\n!"IIIITTenn7TnB@;7>lBBn72KbvKxKzZC}"i~'^"(22TN"""28"2222222222888,\HBBH>8HH"&H>XHH8HB8>HH^HH>"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""""2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d""%7777777777>>>0eOIIOD>OO%*ODaOO>OI>DOOgOOD%%37%07070%777V7777%*77O77055;%;3%%%%%%%%%7%7O0O0O0O0O0aHI0D0D0D0D0%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O0O7O6O7O7O7>7O0O0O0I0I0I;I0OED0D0D0D0O7O7O7O;O7O;O7%%7%%%7M>;;O7DD,D%D%DO7AO7O7O7O7aOI%I%I%>*>*>*>;D.DD3O7O7O7O7O7O7gOO;D0D0D0O7D%O7>*D%O7E77%%WMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN(BB(37%07777j7#TT7!#TT7T!%%007n&&Bn77lBTn(nBB(AZZ>>n%07\n!"IIIITTenn7TnB@;7>lBBn7&7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XP'2a=5,&a\  P6G;&P(2e=5,&e4  pG;&\)0_=5,%&_*f9 xr G;&X*y.X80,X\  P6G;P+7nC:,|Xn4  pG;XP:% ,J:\  P6G;JP]H5!,),5\  P6G;,P\^{,W80,%BZW*f9 xr G;XP:% ,J:\  P6G;JP2\р-&7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XP'2a=5,&a\  P6G;&P(2e=5,&e4  pG;&\)0_=5,%&_*f9 xr G;&X*y.X80,X\  P6G;P+7nC:,|Xn4  pG;X,P:% ,J:\  P6G;JP-H5!,i,5\  P6G;,P\{,W80,%0W*f9 xr G;XnJv| 0 S- X    S-  Federal Communications Commission`}(#DA 981388 ă  yxdddy ՊX01Í ÍX81Í Í@July 8, 1998 2:50pm@X81Í ÍX81Í Í P3 Before the Federal Communications Commission  S-" Washington, D.C. 20554 ă  yO`-#X\  P6G;P#In the Matter of:R) R)  S-#&a\  P6G;&P#DIGITAL BROADCASTING OVSR) R) Certification to Operate anR)  Sx-Open Video SystemR)hpp  xx 0(#(#X T T  S -  MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ă  S -X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:City and County of San Francisco ("San Francisco") and the California Cable Television Association  S-("CCTA") filed oppositions.Xʈ yO@- x#X\  P6G;P#эSan Francisco Opposition (July 2, 1998). CCTA Opposition (July 7, 1998). CCTA is a trade association  xrepresenting both rural and national multiple system cable operators that operate over 250 cable systems and that serve more than six million cable subscribers in California.  S- ` %x2.` ` Pursuant to Section 653(a)(1) of the Communications Act, any person may obtain  S`- xcertification to operate an open video system.\`ʈ yO- x#X\  P6G;P#э47 C.F.R.  76.1501. An operator of a cable system, however, generally may not obtain such certification  {O - xwithin its cable service area unless it is subject to "effective competition" as defined in Section 623(1)(l) of the  {Oz -Communications Act, 47 U.S.C.  543(l)(l). IJ In light of the brief period (ten days) for Commission  xreview of certification filings, the Commission concluded that Congress intended a streamlined certification  S- xyprocess.} ʈ yO -#X\  P6G;P#эSecond Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 18243.} Prospective open video system operators may apply for certification at any point prior to the  xcommencement of service, subject to two conditions. If construction of new physical plant is required,  xlthe applicant must obtain Commission approval of its certification prior to the commencement of  xconstruction. If no new construction is required, the applicant must obtain certification prior to the  x=commencement of service, allowing itself sufficient time to comply with the Commission's requirements  SH -regarding notifications that must be provided to potential programming providers.}H ʈ {O-#X\  P6G;P#эId. at 18247; 47 C.F.R.  76.1502(a).}  S - ` # x3.` ` Despite the streamlined nature of the certification process, the Commission intended it to  xprovide purposeful representations regarding the responsibilities of the open video system operator by  S - x0requiring that applicants verify their certifications and provide specified information. . ʈ yOv-#X\  P6G;P#эSecond Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 1824546. To obtain  xjcertification, an applicant must file FCC Form 1275, which requires, among other things: (a) a statement  SX- xof ownership, including a list of all affiliated entities;l X ʈ yO- x#X\  P6G;P#эWe note that for purposes of determining whether a party is an affiliate, we have adopted the definitions  xZcontained in the notes to Section 76.501 of our rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.501, with certain modifications. 47 C.F.R.  xK76.1500(g). Generally, we will consider an entity to be an open video system operator's "affiliate" if the open  {O- xhvideo system operator holds 5% or more of the entity's stock, whether voting or nonvoting. In re Implementation  {O- xof Section 302 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Open Video Systems, Third Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, 11 FCC Rcd. 20227, 20235 (1996) ("Third Report and Order"); 47 C.F.R. 76.1500(g).l (b) a representation that the applicant will comply  S0- xwith the Commission's regulations under Section 653(b);= 0:ʈ yO "- x-#X\  P6G;P#эCommunications Act  653(b), 47 U.S.C.  573(b). Under this section the applicant agrees to comply with  xthe Commission's requirements regarding nondiscriminatory carriage; just and reasonable rates, terms, and  xconditions; a onethird capacity limit on the amount of activated channel capacity on which an open video system  xoperator may select programming when demand for carriage exceeds system capacity; channel sharing; sports  xexclusivity, network nonduplication, and syndicated exclusivity; and nondiscriminatory treatment in presenting  {O%-information to subscribers. Id. See 47 C.F.R.  76.1502(a).= (c) a list of the names of the communities the  xapplicant anticipates it will serve; (d) a statement of the anticipated type and amount of channel capacity" ,`(`(88"  xthat the system will provide; and (e) a representation as to whether the applicant is a cable operator  S-applying for certification within its cable franchise area.pp  S-  S-II.xOPPOSITIONS  S8- ` x4.` ` San Francisco urges us to deny DBOVS' Application on two substantive grounds: (1) the  x\fiveday open video system FCC Form 1275 comment period violates the Due Process Clause of the  S- xUnited States Constitution;o ʈ yOP-#X\  P6G;P#эSan Francisco Opposition at 23.o and (2) open video system certifications effect an unconstitutional taking of  S- xSan Francisco's property.` Xʈ S -ԍ#X\  P6G;P#Id. at 37.` In the event that we approve DBOVS' Application, San Francisco urges us  x=to limit DBOVS' right to use or occupy San Francisco's property by requiring DBOVS to first obtain all  Sp-necessary authorizations from San Francisco.`pʈ {O-#X\  P6G;P#эId. at 79.`  S - ` x5.` ` Although conceding that DBOVS properly completed its Application and followed our  xprocedural requirements, CCTA argues that we should deny DBOVS' Application because DBOVS has  xnot demonstrated that it "is prepared to actually construct an OVS system and serve the communities for  S -which it is already certified." ʈ {O- x#X\  P6G;P#эCCTA Opposition at 3; see In re DBOVS, 11 FCC Rcd. 12854 (Cab. Servs. Bur. 1996), application for review  {O-denied, 12 FCC Rcd. 20764 (1997).  S -  SX-III.xDISCUSSION  S0-  S- ` Bx 6.` ` We have reviewed DBOVS' FCC Form 1275 and related attachments. As required by  xFCC Form 1275, DBOVS' Application provides: company information and a separate statement of  x!ownership, including all affiliated entities; eligibility and compliance representations; and system  x.information, system capacity and verification statements. DBOVS' certificate of service represents that  xit served its Application on the Commission's Office of the Secretary, the Cable Service Bureau's Office  xof the Bureau Chief, and on the designated telecommunications officials of the communities affected by  S-its Application.xʈ yO-#X\  P6G;P#эDBOVS Application Certificate of Service.x  S- `  x7.` ` The ten day statutorily mandated review period for open video system certification  x applications requires us to confine our review to issues concerning DBOVS' FCC Form 1275 and its  xrelated attachments. The purpose of the open video system certification process is to determine whether DBOVS' Application complies with Congress' mandate and our regulations.  S- ` x8.` ` Neither San Francisco nor CCTA challenge the accuracy or sufficiency of the information  xLthat DBOVS provided in compliance with our rules and FCC Form 1275. Instead, they raise issues that  xfall outside the scope of the certification process and do not constitute grounds for us to deny DBOVS' Application."v ,`(`(88"Ԍ S- ` $ԙx9.` ` San Francisco argues that the five days provided under our regulations to respond to a  xLprospective open video system operator's FCC Form 1275 is insufficient as a matter of due process and  S- x>did not permit it to complete even the most rudimentary due diligence check.tʈ yO-#X\  P6G;P#эSan Francisco Opposition at 23, 78.t The Commission has  S- xpreviously addressed this issue.Xʈ yO-#X\  P6G;P#эThird Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 2024347; Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 18245. The tenday review period is mandated by statute.nʈ yO-#X\  P6G;P#э47 U.S.C.  573(a)(1).n Given that  xconstraint, the Commission established the fiveday comment period to provide affected parties the  S8- xmaximum opportunity to be heard consistent with the tenday review requirement.8xʈ {OP - xh#X\  P6G;P#эIn re Glades Telecommunications, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd. 10331, 10335 (Cab. Servs. Bur.), pet. for recon. filed June 5, 1998. In addition, although  xthe certification process is by necessity streamlined, the Commission's regulations afford adequate  xopportunity to interested parties, particularly through the complaint process, to seek a remedy of any  S-violation of law or regulation.9ʈ {O2- xx#X\  P6G;P#эFourth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 754647; Second Report and Order, 11 FCC. Rcd. at 1834144; In  {O-re Starpower Communications, LLC, 13 FCC Rcd. 2169, 2175 (Cab. Servs. Bur. 1998).9  Sp- ` ~x10.` ` San Francisco also takes issue with the Commission's decision to let nonlocal exchange  SH - x.carriers apply for and operate open video systems. The Commission addressed this issue in the Second  S -Report and Order, wherein it describes the statutory support for its position. . ʈ {O-#X\  P6G;P#эSan Francisco Opposition at 8 n.7. See Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 1823242.  S - ` x11.` ` San Francisco's second constitutional argument is grounded in the Takings Clause of the  x-United States Constitution. San Francisco contends that a grant of an open video system certification leads  S - xto "forced occupation" of its property and for which it must be justly compensated.o ʈ yO-#X\  P6G;P#эSan Francisco Opposition at 37.o In examining the  x-scope of preemption authority granted to the Commission by Congress to preempt local governments from  ximposing Title VI franchise or Title VI "franchiselike" requirements on open video system operators, the  xCommission concluded that the narrow preemption at issue did not raise a Fifth Amendment taking  S- xbecause Congress provided for "just compensation" to the local governments.P ʈ {O-#X\  P6G;P#эThird Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 20307; see 47 U.S.C.  573(c)(2)(B). San Francisco may recover  x"normal fees associated with the zoning and construction" of open video systems, as long as it imposes  x-them in a nondiscriminatory, neutral manner that does not duplicate the compensation provided by a gross  Sh-revenues fee.hʈ yO#-#X\  P6G;P#эThird Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 2030911.  S- ` x12.` ` To avoid the constitutional issue, San Francisco argues that we should either deny  xDBOVS' Application or "condition any approval to clarify that DBOVS must obtain permission from the  xjCity to use City streets, and that the City retains the discretion to determine the time, place, and manner"r,`(`(883"  S- xof DBOVS' use of City streets."mʈ yOh-#X\  P6G;P#эSan Francisco Opposition at 7.m There is no need to expressly condition DBOVS' certification in this  xmanner because open video system certification does not interfere with a local government's ability to  xKcontrol its rightsofway. In this regard, the Commission has stated that "Management of the rightsofway  xyis a traditional local government function. Local governments should be able to manage the rightsofway  S`-in their usual fashions without the imposition of unique requirements for open video service."|`Xʈ yOX-#X\  P6G;P#эThird Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. at 20311.|  S- `  x13.` ` With respect to CCTA's contention that we deny DBOVS' Application until it is prepared  xto "actually construct" an open video system in the areas for which we have already certified it to operate  xopen video systems, we note that neither our regulations nor FCC Form 1275 require DBOVS to provide  x=a rollout schedule or similarly detailed information on the timing and manner of deployment of facilities  Sp-or service.pʈ {O -#X\  P6G;P#эIn re DBOVS, 13 FCC Rcd. 2040, 2043 (Cab. Servs. Bur. 1997).  S - ` x14.` ` We find that DBOVS has provided the requisite facts and representations concerning the  xopen video system it intends to operate and has certified that it "agrees to comply and remain in  xcompliance with each of the Commission's regulations" under Section 653(b) of  $F the Communications Act.  xWe note that, if any representation in DBOVS' Application proves to be materially false or materially  xinaccurate, the Commission retains the authority to revoke DBOVS' certification or impose such other  x penalties it deems appropriate, including forfeiture. We further find that San Francisco and CCTA's  xoppositions have not raised issues that warrant denial of DBOVS' open video system Application for  S-Certification.  S-IV.xORDERING CLAUSES  Sh- ` x15.` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the certification application of Digital Broadcasting  xOVS to operate open video systems in Alameda, Albany, Atherton, Belmont, Berkeley, Brisbane,  x=Burlingame, Campbell, Colma, Cupertino, Daly City, East Palo Alto, Emeryville, Foster City, Fremont,  xLHayward, Hillsborough, Los Altos Hills, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Menlo Park, Millbrae, Milpitas, Monte  xSerno, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Newark, Oakland, Pacifica, Palo Alto, Piedmont, Portola Valley,  x[Redwood City, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Francisco, San Jose, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Saratoga, South  Sx-San Francisco, Sunnyvale, Union City, and Woodside IS APPROVED .  S(- ` x16.` ` This action is taken by the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau, pursuant to the authority  S-delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules.zʈ yO"-#X\  P6G;P##X\  P6G;P#э47 C.F.R.  0.321.  $F   S-x` `  hh@FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION(#(#X  S8-x` `  hh@ John E. Logan, Deputy Chief  S -x` `  hh@ Cable Services Bureau