********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
                                )
Integretel, Inc.,               )
                                )
     Complainant,               )
                                )
          v.                    )       File No. E-92-106
                                )
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company,)
                                )
     Defendant.                 )


                             ORDER


     Adopted:  July 22, 1997;      Released:  July 24, 1997

By the Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch, Enforcement Division, 
Common Carrier Bureau:  

     1.   With this Order we dismiss a formal complaint filed by Integretel, Inc. (Integretel) against
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company (CBT) on September 8, 1992, pursuant to Section 208 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act).  In that complaint, Integretel alleged that CBT refused
to provide telephone credit card validation data to all interexchange carriers and operator service providers,
except AT&T Corp., in violation of Sections 201(b) and 202(a) of the Act.  On October 15, 1992, CBT filed
an answer denying the alleged violations.  On July 15, 1997, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that
the complaint be dismissed with prejudice.  In support of their motion, the parties state that a mutually
satisfactory settlement has been reached.  

     2.   We are satisfied that granting the parties' joint motion to dismiss the complaint with
prejudice will serve the public interest by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of
further time and resources by the parties and the Commission.  

     3.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the
Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 154(j), 208, and the authority delegated by Sections
0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, that the joint motion to dismiss the
above-captioned complaint IS GRANTED.  
     4.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned complaint is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE and that this proceeding IS TERMINATED.

                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



                              Kurt A. Schroeder  
                              Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch
                              Enforcement Division
                              Common Carrier Bureau