******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 ) MCI WORLDCOM, INC. ) ) and ) ) AT&T Corp. ) ) Complainants, ) ) v. ) File No. EAD-99-003 ) ) BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER Adopted: August 23, 1999 Released: August 23, 1999 By the Chief, Accelerated Complaint Resolution Branch, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau" 1. On June 30, 1999, MCI WorldCom, Inc. and AT&T Corp. (Complainants) filed the above captioned complaint pursuant to the Commission's Accelerated Docket procedures against Bell Atlantic Corporation alleging that Bell Atlantic had violated and continued to violate the obligations it incurred as conditions for approval of the merger of the former Bell Atlantic Corporation and the former NYNEX Corporation. Complainants sought an order to enforce the conditions requiring Bell Atlantic to implement uniform interfaces for use by competitive local exchange carriers to obtain nondiscriminatory access to Bell Atlantic's operations support systems. 2. On August 20, 1999, MCI WorldCom and AT&T filed a joint motion to dismiss their complaint in this action. In support of that motion, Complainants state that the parties have entered a settlement agreement with Bell Atlantic. Complainants also represent that Bell Atlantic does not oppose the motion. 3. Based on the representations in the Complainants' motion, we believe that the dismissal of this complaint will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and eliminating the need for further litigation and the attendant expenditure of additional time and resources by the parties and the Commission. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91 and 0.291, that the Complainants' joint motion to dismiss IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and this proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Frank G. Lamancusa Chief, Accelerated Complaint Resolution Branch Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau