******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) Universal Service ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 West Virginia Public Service ) Commission ) ) Request for Waiver of State ) Certification Requirements for ) High-Cost Universal Service Support ) For Non-Rural Carriers ) order Adopted: March 9, 2001 Released: March 13, 2001 By the Commission: 1. In this Order, we grant the Petition of the West Virginia Public Service Commission (West Virginia Commission) for a waiver of the calendar year 2001 state certification requirements for high-cost universal service support in areas served by non-rural carriers. This waiver will permit non-rural carriers in West Virginia to receive federal high-cost universal service support for calendar year 2001, including the first quarter of calendar year 2001. We believe that this waiver is in the public interest and is necessary to ensure that consumers in high- cost areas served by non-rural carriers in West Virginia are not harmed by the West Virginia Commission's failure to timely file the required certification with the Commission prior to October 1, 2000. I. BACKGROUND 2. In its Ninth Report and Order on universal service, the Commission, building upon the framework established in its Universal Service Order and Seventh Report and Order, set forth a federal high-cost support mechanism to enable non-rural carriers' rates for services supported by universal service to remain affordable and reasonably comparable in all regions of the nation. Among other things, the federal high-cost universal service support mechanism established in the Ninth Report and Order set forth specific certification requirements with which states wishing to receive federal universal service high-cost support for all non-rural carriers within their territory must comply. These state certifications must state that all federal high-cost support received by non-rural carriers in the state will be used in a manner consistent with section 254(e) of the Communications Act. The Commission concluded that, absent the timely filing of such certification by their state commission, non-rural carriers in a state would not receive federal high-cost universal service support for the applicable certification period. 3. The Commission set forth specific certification periods in its rules. Under section 54.313(c)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, states were required to file their certifications by October 1, 2000 in order for non-rural carriers serving high-cost areas in the state to receive support for the first, second, third, and fourth quarters of calendar year 2001. If a state does not file before October 1, 2000, but files its certification before January 1, 2001, non-rural carriers in that state will receive support for only the second, third, and fourth quarters of calendar year 2001. 4. On October 23, 2000, the West Virginia Commission submitted its section 54.313 certification on behalf of Verizon West Virginia, the only non-rural carrier in the state of West Virginia. In its certification letter, the West Virginia Commission recognized that its filing was untimely, and requested that the Commission nevertheless accept its certification for funding for the entire calendar year of 2001. The West Virginia Commission stated that its failure to meet the October 23, 2001 deadline was "inadvertent" and resulted from the fact that universal service funding requirements for the year 2001 in West Virginia had not been calculated as of October 1, 2000. The West Virginia Commission subsequently filed a separate petition requesting that the Commission consider the West Virginia Commission's October 23, 2000 certification letter out- of-time and allow non-rural carriers in West Virginia to receive federal high-cost universal service funding for the entire calendar year 2001. II. DISCUSSION 5. As an initial matter, we note that the West Virginia Commission's October 23, 2000 certification does, under the Commission's rules, ensure that non-rural carriers in West Virginia will be able to receive high-cost support for the second, third, and fourth quarters of calendar year 2001. At issue here is whether or not the West Virginia Commission is entitled to a waiver of the October 1, 2000 filing deadline to ensure that non-rural carriers serving in West Virginia will also receive high-cost support for the first quarter of calendar year 2001. 6. The Commission may waive any provision of its rules on its own motion and for good cause shown. A rule may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. In sum, waiver is appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. 7. We conclude that special circumstances exist to justify a waiver of section 54.313(c)(2)(i) of our rules as requested by the West Virginia Commission. Specifically, we find that the potential harm that would be suffered by customers of non-rural carriers in West Virginia, as a consequence of the West Virginia Commission's failure to timely file its section 54.313 certification before the October 1, 2000 deadline, justifies a waiver in this instance. We note that the potential harm caused by loss of one quarter of annual federal high-cost support is particularly egregious in a state such as West Virginia, which historically has service costs in excess of the national average. We believe, therefore, that it would be consistent with the public interest and the intent of section 254 of the Communications Act to grant the Petition and thus provide federal high-cost support to non-rural carriers in West Virginia for the first quarter of 2001. 8. While we are, as a general matter, reluctant to grant waivers of Commission rules, especially waivers of the section 54.313 certification requirements, we note that the West Virginia Commission has made the necessary certification, albeit untimely. We thus have no reason to believe that non-rural carriers in the state of West Virginia will use federal high-cost support for the first quarter of 2001 in a manner contrary to the direction of section 254 of the Act. Although we are granting the waiver of section 54.313 of our rules and conclude in this Order that non-rural carriers serving in West Virginia shall be allowed to receive federal high- cost universal service support for the entire calendar year of 2001, we caution the West Virginia Commission that, in subsequent program years, it should take steps to ensure that all applicable certifications necessary to secure federal high-cost support are filed with the Commission before the expiration of the applicable filing deadline. III. ORDERING CLAUSE 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C.  1.3, that the Petition for waiver of section 54.313(c)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  54.313(c)(2)(i), filed by the West Virginia Public Service Commission on January 29, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary