********************* ********************* ************** NOTICE ********************* ********************* ************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ********************* ********************* ********************* ** PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1919 M STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 98-776 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: April 22, 1998 Nevada Bell Petitions Commission for Permission to Implement New Service Rate Elements Pleading Cycle Established COMMENTS: April 29, 1998 On April 20, 1998, Nevada Bell filed a petition requesting permission to implement a series of Service Provider Number Portability (SPNP) Query Service rate elements patterned after certain rate elements that another local exchange carrier (LEC) had proposed and which the Commission had previously approved. Nevada Bell proposes these rate elements in order to recover the costs incurred in the implementation and provision of SPNP service. Nevada Bell asserts that Ameritech Corp (Ameritech) and Bell Atlantic previously filed petitions under Part 69.4(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  69.4(g), to establish new service access tariff rate elements intended to recover the ongoing costs of providing number portability query services to telecommunications carriers that do not provide their own database capabilities. Nevada Bell states that both of these petitions were approved and that, pursuant to the Third Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-262, after an incumbent LEC has satisfied the public interest requirement for establishing new rate elements for a new switched access service and the original petition did not rely on a competitive showing, other incumbent price cap LECs can introduce identical new services and their petitions will be reviewed within 10 days. Nevada Bell therefore requests permission to implement the following rate elements, which it claims are identical in all material respects to those approved for Ameritech and Bell Atlantic: SPNP Query for prearranged charges from its end office; SPNP Query for prearranged charges from its tandem; SPNP Query for default charges from its end office; and SPNP Query for default charges from its tandem. Interested parties may file comments on Nevada Bell's petition no later than April 29, 1998. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: CCB/CPD 98-31. An original and four copies of all comments must be filed in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be filed with International Transcription Services (ITS), the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, and one copy with the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 518, Washington, D.C. 20554. For further information, contact Yvonne Hawkins, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-1530. - FCC -