******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Implementation of Section 309(j) of the ) MM Docket No. 97-234 Communications Act -- Competitive Bidding ) for Commercial Broadcast and Instructional ) Television Fixed Service Licenses ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 28, 2000 Released: March 1, 2000 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: 1. The Commission, by the Chief, Mass Media Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, has before it a "Petition for Reconsideration" filed June 2, 1999, by Booth, Freret, Imlay and Tepper, P.C. (BFIT) and a "Request for Clarification and/or Reconsideration" filed May 19, 1999, by Snyder Hill Broadcasting, Inc. (Snyder Hill) seeking further reconsideration of the Commission's Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 99-74, in MM Docket No. 97-234, released April 20, 1999, concerning its broadcast competitive bidding rules adopted in its First Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 15920 (1998). For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition and Request. 2. In its Petition, BFIT asks that the Commission reconsider its prior reconsideration decision to prohibit engineering amendments to be filed after the submission of short forms (FCC Form 175) by applicants for new AM station facilities. In its Request, Snyder Hill also asks that the Commission reconsider its prior reconsideration decision to forego making a pre-auction determination as to the legal and technical qualifications of bidders in broadcast auctions. Both of these issues were fully considered and resolved by the Commission in the Memorandum Opinion and Order at  14-18 (pre-auction determination) and  57-67 (post-Form 175 engineering amendments). Petitioners proffer no new facts or arguments warranting reconsideration of the Commission's prior decision. As a result, both petitions for reconsideration are repetitious. See 47 C.F.R.  1.106(k)(3). 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, That the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Booth, Freret, Imlay and Tepper, P.C. and the Request for Clarification and Reconsideration filed by Snyder Hill Broadcasting, Inc., ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau