WPCj 2BJZ Courier3|fx6X@KX@HP LaserJet 4 PostScript RM 8010HPLA4POS.PRSx  @hhhh"\{X@26 ZF03|fHP LaserJet 4 PostScript RM 8010HPLA4POS.PRSC\  P6Qhhhh"\{PTimes RomanTimes Roman BoldTimes Roman Italic S- I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#&J\  P6Qx&P#2vp_kk:a8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# 2v|tfa2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# 2 2  | ( a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# 2?    f a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2Kq ==a1DocumentgDocument Style StyleXqq   l ^) I. ׃  Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . 2:}+xa2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   2lx/{a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . PleadingHeader for numbered pleading paperP@n   $] X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:;?~<@i=header=Ax 4 <D  #FxX  Pg9CXP# reference>;#FxX  Pg9CXP#itemizeX1?&V 8F ` hp xr#FxX  Pg9CXP#header2@I ` hp x`    #FxX  Pg9CXP# 2BA^3?BO@CADqaBheading 3AF` hp x #FxX  Pg9CXP# footer!B!!#d\  PCP#a1Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'C%STD*  a2Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'DUV2DEqCFquCGqCHqWDa3Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'EWXa4Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'FYZa5Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'G[\a6Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'H]^2FIqDJqkEK}ELYFa7Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'I_`a8Agenda.E+'*Ç.Agenda Items=('87=FGD!*'7=*'Jaba1Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'K$cd a2Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'L/ef 2IMGNGODHPHa3Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'M:gh a4Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'NEij a5Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'OPkl a6Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'P[mn 2LQIRJS\KTKa7Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'Qfop a8Paragraph+'*Ç.1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)' =('87=F*'Rqqr a159.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'S8st@   a259.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'TAuv@` `  ` ` ` 2OULV_MW NXNa359.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'UJwx` ` @  ` `  a459.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'VSyz` `  @  a559.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'W\{|` `  @hh# hhh a659.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'Xe}~` `  hh#@( hh# 2yRYOZ{P[LQ\Qa759.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'Yn` `  hh#(@- ( a859.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'Zw` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp a160.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'[8@   a260.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'\A@` `  ` ` ` 2qU]R^OS_S`Ta360.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*']J` ` @  ` `  a460.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'^S` `  @  a560.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'_\` `  @hh# hhh a660.E+'*Ç.Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'87=F*'`e` `  hh#@( hh# 2kXaUbkVca݅@  I.   X(# 2_am^ndN_o_p`SubheadingSubheadingm0\ E A.  HIGHLIGHT 1Italics and Boldldeddn+. DRAFT ONHeader A Text = DRAFT and Dateo X =8` (#FDRAFTă r  ` (#=D3 1, 43 12pt (Z)(PC-8))T2Dă  ӟDRAFT OFFTurn Draft Style offp@@    2Ufq1ar1bs1ct1$eLETTER LANDLetter Landscape - 11 x 8.5q 3'3'Standard'3'3StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11 ;   LEGAL LANDLegal Landscape - 14 x 8.5rf 3'3'Standard'A'AStandardZ K e6VE L"nu;   LETTER PORTLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11sL 3'3'Standard3'3'StandardZ K e6VE L"nU9   LEGAL PORTLegal Portrait - 8.5 x 14t 3'3'StandardA'A'StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 119   2DhunfvfwdvgxjgTITLETitle of a DocumentuK\ * ăBLOCK QUOTESmall, single-spaced, indentedvN X HIGHLIGHT 2Large and Bold LargewB*d. HIGHLIGHT 3Large, Italicized and Underscoredx V -q2?nyvhzEj{-k|8mLETTERHEADLetterhead - date/marginsyu H XX  3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"nE9    * 3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3' II"n"Tv3'StandarddZ K e VE L"nU9 Ѓ   INVOICE FEETFee Amount for Math Invoicez ,, $0$0  MEMORANDUMMemo Page Format{D.   ! M E M O R A N D U M ă r  y<N dddy   INVOICE EXPSEExpense Subtotals for Math Invoice|:A ,p, $0$002q}8qn~oXJq[qINVOICE TOTTotals Invoice for Math Macro}z 4p, $0$00INVOICE HEADRHeading Portion of Math Invoice~+C`*   4X 99L$0 **(  ӧ XX NORMALReturn to Normal TypestyleSMALLSmall Typestyle2s[/r[r[r[@sFINEFine TypestyleLARGELarge TypestyleEXTRA LARGEExtra Large TypestyleVERY LARGEVery Large Typestyle2vsXPuuHvENVELOPEStandard Business Envelope with Header+w ,,EnvelopeZ K e VE L"n,,EnvelopeLarge, Italicized and Under;    ,, 88+  `   1dfStyle 14Swiss 8 Pt Without Margins$$D Co> PfQ  )a [ PfQO Style 12Dutch Italics 11.5$$F )^ `> XifQ  )a [ PfQO 2~wl{e}~Style 11Initial Codes for Advanced IIJ )a [ PfQK  dddn  #  [ X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 ! )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   x )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   j-n )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  jBX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 3oDutch Roman 11.5 with Margins/Tabs )a [ PfQO  ddn  # c0*b, oT9 !Style 4 PSwiss 8 Point with MarginsDq Co> PfQ  dddd  #  Style 1.5Dutch Roman 11.5 Font4h )a [ PfQO  dddn 2|~;{Style 2Dutch Italic 11.5$ )^ `> XifQ Style 5Dutch Bold 18 Point$RH$L T~> pfQ_  )a [ PfQO Style 7Swiss 11.5$$V )ao> PfQ ]  )a [ PfQO Style 6Dutch Roman 14 Point$$N w [ PfQ   )a [ PfQO 2vMT[`Style 10oInitial Codes for Advanced U )a [ PfQK  dddn  ##  [[ b, oT9 !b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   Q" )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  QN~ )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 8PfInitial Codes for Beginninggi )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9  [ &e )^ `> XifQ ` Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   d )^ `> XifQ Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jH )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  j )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 9Initial Codes for Intermediate )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 Њ [ e )^ `> XifQ ` Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   3 )^ `> XifQ Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jf )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc.`+ >Page  jX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 UpdateInitial Codes for Update Module )a [ PfQK  dddn  #  [ X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Legal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Legal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide   Q" )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`7 CPage  jN~ )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 2Spqee2*Ç.7=G@6FDocument Style=('87=FG*'Ç.7=.E56` ` ` 3*Ç.7=H@6FDocument Style=('87=FH*'Ç.7=.E7 8 . 4*Ç.7=I@6FDocument Style=('87=FI*'Ç.7=.E 9: 5*Ç.7=J@6FDocument Style=('87=FJ*'Ç.7=.E ;< 2p6*Ç.7=K@6FDocument Style=('87=FK*'Ç.7=.E*=>   7*Ç.7=L@6FDocument Style=('87=FL*'Ç.7=.E?@` ` ` 8*Ç.7=M@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E8AB@   9*Ç.7=N@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EACD@` `  ` ` ` 2| ͛10Ç.7=O@6FDocument Style=('87=FO*'Ç.7=.E0E F    11Ç.7=P@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EJGH` ` @  ` `  12Ç.7=Q@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.ESIJ` `  @  13Ç.7=R@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E\KL` `  @hh# hhh 2ǟt< 14Ç.7=S@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EeMN` `  hh#@( hh# 15Ç.7=T@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EnOP` `  hh#(@- ( 16Ç.7=U@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EwQR` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 17Ç.7=V@6FDocument Style=('87=FV*'Ç.7=.EFST *  ׃  24~18Ç.7=W@6FTechnical Document Style7=FW*'Ç.7=.E&UV  . 19Ç.7=X@6FTechnical Document Style7=FX*'Ç.7=.E&WX  . 20Ç.7=Y@6FTechnical Document Style7=FY*'Ç.7=.E*YZ    21Ç.7=Z@6FTechnical Document Style7=FZ*'Ç.7=.E'[\   2f/22Ç.7=[@6FTechnical Document Style7=F[*'Ç.7=.E&]^   23Ç.7=\@6FTechnical Document Style7=F\*'Ç.7=.E4_$`     24Ç.7=]@6FTechnical Document Style7=F]*'Ç.7=.E&ab  . 25Ç.7=^@6FTechnical Document Style7=F^*'Ç.7=.E&cd  . 2kMܨFormat Downl@6FFormat Downloaded Document=Fc*'Ç.7=.EUgh XX    X\ #d6X@7@#Word222Null@6FWord222Null_' =('87=Fp*'Ç.7=.E1{1|#/x PX##/x PX#HEADING 7t@6FJ>_' =('87=Ft*'Ç.7=.E0p Zwp x (#DDDDDD#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# HEADING 6v@6Ff>_' =('87=Fv*'Ç.7=.E0p Zwp x (#DDDDDD#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# 2̴,wUHEADING 5w@6F>_' =('87=Fw*'Ç.7=.E0p Zwp x (#DDDDDD#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# HEADING 4x@6F>_' =('87=Fx*'Ç.7=.E0 Zwp x (#rr#&n P&P# 4 hp x (##&n P&P# NORMAL INDEN@6F>_' =('87=Fy*'Ç.7=.E'4 <DL!T$#&n P&P##&n P&P#enumlev1=z@6F>_' =('87=Fz*'Ç.7=.E$p  N hp x (#aa#&n P&P#4` hp x (##&n P &P#2Pڶfootnote ref@6Ffootnote reference'87=F{*'Ç.7=.ER#V\  P!UP#Default Para@6FDefault Paragraph Font87=F}*'Ç.7=.E((page number@6Fpage number_' =('87=F~*'Ç.7=.E226Ç.7=@6Ffootnote text =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E>4??US2ַlh^list.7=@6Flist >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E>??endnote refe@6Fendnote reference'87=F*'Ç.7=.ERR#Xj\  P"G;XP##c P#7P#line number@6Fline number_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.EOO#Xj\  P$G;XP##c P%7P#Highlight@6FMiddle Article Highlight7=F*'Ç.7=.E''#G }&Y##\9> (P'YP#2ڽ6ܻ.Headline=@6FHeadline for newsletter87=F*'Ç.7=.E''#> }(Y##\9> (P)YP#2nd line Hea@6F2nd line headline'87=F*'Ç.7=.E''#b> }*Y##\9> (P+YP#Graphics hea@6FHeadlines for graphics87=F*'Ç.7=.E** #o> P},YP##\9> (P-YP# Graphics bod@6Fchart data _' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E** #Alo> P}.YXP##\9> (P/YP# 2l ZZArticle head@6FHeadline for new article7=F*'Ç.7=.E*'#r"z0C# #\9> (P1YP# endnote text@6Fendnote text' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.EYO#X}xP27XP##I2P3QP#toc 17=@6Ftoc 1>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(#`` hp x (#toc 27=@6Ftoc 2>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#`` hp x (#2ZZZRZtoc 37=@6Ftoc 3>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#` hp x (#toc 47=@6Ftoc 4>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E (#` hp x (#toc 57=@6Ftoc 5>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.Eh(#` hp x (#toc 67=@6Ftoc 6>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(# ` hp x (#28ZZDZtoc 77=@6Ftoc 7>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E2(toc 87=@6Ftoc 8>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(# ` hp x (#toc 97=@6Ftoc 9>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(#`` hp x (#index 17=@6Findex 1>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#` hp x (#2Z*Zindex 27=@6Findex 2>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` (#`` hp x (#toa heading@6Ftoa heading_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E(#` hp x (#caption7=@6Fcaption>_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.EYO#X}xP47XP##I2P5QP#_Equation Ca@6F_Equation Caption'87=F*'Ç.7=.EOO#X}xP67XP##I2P7QP#2 FLp27Ç.7=@6FDefault Paragraph Font87=F*'Ç.7=.Eww#X}xP87XP##&sxP97&P#HEADING 9@6F >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'34 <DL!T$#c P:7P##c P;7P#HEADING 8@6F >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'34 <DL!T$#c P<7P##c P=7P#28Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` ` ` 2 qRee(29Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E  . 30Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E  31Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E  32Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E*   2pRT33Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E` ` ` 34Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E8@   35Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EA@` `  ` ` ` 36Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.E0    2|Z37Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.EJ` ` @  ` `  38Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.ES` `  @  39Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.E\` `  @hh# hhh 40Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.Ee` `  hh#@( hh# 2vG41Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.En` `  hh#(@- ( 42Ç.7=@6FRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*'Ç.7=.Ew` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 43Ç.7=@6FDocument Style=('87=F*'Ç.7=.EF *  ׃  44Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 2=n45Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 46Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E*    47Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E'   48Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&   24i49Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E4$     50Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 51Ç.7=@6FTechnical Document Style7=F*'Ç.7=.E&  . 52Ç.7=@6F: >_' =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E'4 <DL!T$#&n P>&P##&n P?&P#2FPr53Ç.7=@6Ffootnote reference'87=F*'Ç.7=.E>#V\  P@UP#54Ç.7=@6FDefault Paragraph Font87=F*'Ç.7=.E55Ç.7=@6Ffootnote text =('87=F*'Ç.7=.E* ??US56Ç.7=@6Fendnote reference'87=F*'Ç.7=.E>>#Xj\  PAG;XP##B\  PBUP#2xFdW57Ç.7=@6F_Equation Caption'87=F*'Ç.7=.E;;#XX2PCQXP##I2PDQP#58Ç.7=@6FFormat Downloaded Document=F*'Ç.7=.EUOP XX    #\ #d6X@7@#Bld/Und7=@6FBold and Underline Text87=F*'Ç.7=.EQR  2`@lfNORMAL INDENT ' 4 <DL!T$#&n P&P##&n P&P#footnote referencefootnote reference4#V\  PUP#Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font footnote textfootnote text US????US2Rg sendnote referenceendnote reference44#XO\  PUXP##B\  PUP#_Equation Caption_Equation Caption11#XX2PQXP##I2PQP#FM7V,,6%TriangleoF4=(g4O7V ,*g4çFM7VE/0a11I.E+')*'0Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers')8?I u*')8ij@   27LvLa21I.E+')*'0Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers')8?I u*')Akl@` `  ` ` ` a31I.E+')*'0Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers')8?I u*')Jmn` ` @  ` `  "S^*8DSS888S^*8*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx8Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf8.8NS8JSJSJ8SS..S.SSSS8A.SSxSSJP!PZ8*888888888888S.xJxJxJxJxJooJfJfJfJfJ8.8.8.8.xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxJxSxSxSxSxS]SxJxJoJoJoJoJxSfJfJfJfJxSxSxSxSxSxSxS8S8S888SA8xSf.f8f8f8f.xSxSxSxSxSxo8o8o8]A]A]A]Af8f8f8xSxSxSxSxxSfJfJN:*LS8JSSSSS.4}}S2S}2.JJS88SS]]8J2t^^\\^^ee*C^.wR)Ewn\1fy\r\Sxx\r"S^.=K\\===\g.=.3\\\\\\\\\\33gggQzzpf=Gpfzfpp=3=V\=Q\Q\Q=\\33\3\\\\=G3\\\\QX%Xc=.============\3QQQQQzzQpQpQpQpQ=3=3=3=3\\\\\\\\\\Q\\\\\f\QQzQzQzQzQ\pQpQpQpQ\\\\\\\=\=\===\G=\p3p=p=p=p3\\\\\z=z=z=fGfGfGfGp=p=p=\\\\\pQpQN@.S\=Q\\\\\39\7\7!3QQ\==\\ff=Q7tggeeggoo.Ig2[-Kye1pe~e\e~2p L@LLL$ "S^.=f\\===\i.=.3\\\\\\\\\\==iii\zzpG\zpfzz=3=k\=\fQfQ=\f3=f3f\ffQG=f\\\QH(H_=.============f3\\\\\QzQzQzQzQG3G3G3G3f\\\\ffff\\f\\\\pf\\QQQQfzQzQzQzQ\\\\\ffGfGfG=Gf\=fz3z=z=z=z3fff\\QQQfGfGfGfGz=z=z=ffff\zQzQN@.c\=\\\\\\7=\7\733\\\==\\ff=\7tiieeiioo.Ii2[-Kye1pe~efe~"S^%-77\V%%%7>%7777777777>>>1eOIIOC=OO%+OCbOO=OI=COOhOOC%%47%17171%777V7777%+77O77155<%%%n%%%%%%%%%%7O1O1O1O1O1bII1C1C1C1C1%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O1O7O7O7O7O7=7O1O1I1I1I1I1O7C1C1C1C1O7O7O7O7O7O7O7%7%7%%%7+%O7CC%C%C%CO7O7O7O7O7bOI%I%I%=+=+=+=+C%C%C%O7O7O7O7hOO7C1C1N'27%177777"SS7!TT7S!117n%%77l==n%1ni!t>><<>>mBBs,>[N6-msTN[TTTH_<1CPSystem (AMTS) stations at various locations along the Great Lakes filed by Fred Daniel d/b/a Orion  S- xTelecom (Orion) on September 26, 1996,^zO yO-  ԍxFile Nos. 879085 (Calumet, MI), 879086 (Rochester, NY), 879087 (Buffalo, NY), 879088 (Kenosha, WI),  xw879089 (Duluth, MN), 879090 (Michigan City, IN), 879091 (Erie, PA), 879092 (Cleveland, OH), 879093 (Toledo,  x<OH), 879094 (Detroit, MI), 879095 (Muskegon, MI), 879096 (Milwaukee, WI), 879097 (Charlevoix, MI), and  xh879098 (Rogers City, MI). The applications were listed on Public Notice, October 22, 1996. Public Notice, Report  {O'- xwNo. 1908 (rel. Oct. 22, 1996). The applications sought authorization to use AMTS Group A and B frequencies. See  xh47 C.F.R.  80.385. However, on November 26, 1997, Orion amended its applications to delete the requests for the Group B frequencies.^ and by Paging Systems, Inc. (PSI) between November 1996  Sl- xand March 1998. l O yO-  ԍxFile Nos. 850001 (Chicago, IL), 850002 (Goetzville, MI), 850003 (Houghton, MI), 850004 (Marquette, MI),  x850005 (Oscoda, MI), 850006 (Port Huron, MI), 850007 (Quanicassie, MI), 850008 (Stutsmanville, MI), 850009  x+ (Washburn, WI), 850010 (Duluth, MN), 850011 (Buffalo, NY), 850012 (Cape Vincent, NY), 850013 (Lewiston, NY),  x850014 (Oswego, NY), 850015 (Rochester, NY), 850016 (Lakewood, OH), 850017 (Pleasant Hill, PA), 850018  x<(Green Bay, WI), 850019 (Sturgeon Bay, WI), 850438 (Toledo, OH), 851651 (Port Washington, WI), 851652  x+ (Whitehall, MI), 851852 (Alpena, MI), 851853 (Cooks, MI), and 851855 (Traverse City, MI). Applications 850001 x19 were filed on November 19, 1996, and listed on Public Notice, December 10, 1996. Public Notice, Report No.  xw1915 (rel. Dec. 10, 1996). Application 850438 was filed on January 17, 1997, and listed on Public Notice, February  x4, 1997. Public Notice, Report No. 1923 (rel. Feb. 4, 1997). Applications 851651 and 851652 were filed on  xFebruary 12, 1998, and listed on Public Notice, March 3, 1993. Public Notice, Report No. 1978 (rel. Mar. 3, 1998).  xxApplications 851852 and 851853 were filed on March 24, 1998, and application 851855 was filed on March 27,  x=1998, and listed on Public Notice, April 7, 1998. Public Notice, Report No. 1983 (rel. Apr. 7, 1998). Each  xwapplication seeks authorization to use AMTS Group B frequencies. In addition, applications for Group A frequencies were filed on November 19, 1996 and January 17, 1997, but withdrawn on November 26, 1997.  By letter dated January 9, 1998, the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch of the"l, * *,,"  xPublic Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau requested  S- xksupplemental information from the applicants, * yO5-  \ԍxLetter from Michael J. Regiec, Acting Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and  xPrivate Wireless Division, to Orion, Ref. No. PS&PWDLTAB666 (Jan. 9, 1998); Letter from Michael J. Regiec,  xActing Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, to PSI, Ref. No. PS&PWDLTAB666 (Jan. 9, 1998). which Orion provided on February 6, 1998,* yO-  ԍxLetter from Dennis C. Brown, counsel for Orion, to Michael J. Regiec, Acting Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division (Feb. 5, 1998) (Orion Supplement). and PSI  S- x-provided on March 6, 1998.* yOB -  kԍxLetter from Audrey P. Rasmussen, counsel for PSI, to Kim Kleppinger, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division (Mar. 5, 1998) (PSI Supplement). For the reasons set forth below, the abovecaptioned applications are granted to the extent stated herein and are otherwise denied.  S- II. BACKGROUND ă  S- ` qx2.` ` An AMTS is a specialized system of public coast stations providing integrated,  xinterconnected marine voice and data communications, somewhat like a cellular phone system, for tugs,  S5- x.barges, and other commercial vessels as they move along a waterway.\5` * yO5-  ԍx47 C.F.R.  80.5, 80.385(a)(1); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime  {O- xCommunications, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, PR Docket No.  {O-92257, 12 FCC Rcd 16949, 17004 (1997) (Maritime Second Report and Order). AMTS offers improved services  xover those available from individual public coast stations, by relieving vessel operators from having to  xchange frequencies and contact new coast stations (which may have different call setup and billing  S - xprocedures) during their travel along waterways. * yO-  #ԍxAmendment of Parts 2 and 80 of the Commission's Rules Applicable to Automated Maritime  {O- xTelecommunications Systems (AMTS), First Report and Order, RM5712, 6 FCC Rcd 437, 437 (1991) (AMTS  {OR- xNationwide Order); Amendment of Parts 2, 81 and 83 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum for an  xAutomated Inland Waterways Communications System (IWCS) along the Mississippi River and Connecting  {O- xWaterways, Report and Order, GEN Docket No. 801, 84 FCC 2d 875, 876, on reconsideration, Memorandum  {O- xOpinion and Order, GEN Docket No. 801, 88 FCC 2d 678 (1981), aff'd sub nom. WJG Tel. Co. v. FCC, 675 F.2d  {Ox-386 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (IWCS Report and Order). The Commission allocated spectrum for AMTS use on  Si - xjthe Mississippi River system in 1981,_i * {O-ԍxIWCS Report and Order, 84 FCC 2d at 900._ and expanded the authorized service area to the Gulf Intracoastal  S6 -Waterway in 1982,R Z6 `* yO6!-  MԍxAmendment of Parts 2, 81 and 83 of the Rules to Add the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the Authorized  {O!- xService Area of Inland Waterways Communications Systems, Report and Order, GEN Docket No. 81822, 51 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 440, 443 (1982).R the Gulf of Mexico in 1984,X Z6 * yOX$-  ԍxAmendment of Parts 2, 81 and 83 of the Rules to Add the Gulf of Mexico to the Authorized Service Areas  {O %- xof Maritime Mobile Systems Operating in the 216220 MHz Band, Report and Order, GEN Docket No. 8418, 56 Rad. Reg. 2d (P&F) 1613, 1616 (1984).X and nationwide in 1991.j 6 * {Oz'-ԍxAMTS Nationwide Order, 6 FCC Rcd at 437, 440.j"6 6 ,l(l(,, "Ԍ S- ` ԙx3.` ` On September 26, 1996, Orion, which currently provides AMTS service along the Atlantic,  xPacific, and Hawaiian coasts, filed license applications for AMTS stations at Rochester and Buffalo, NY;  xkErie, PA; Cleveland and Toledo, OH; Detroit, Rogers City, Charlevoix, Muskegon, and Calumet, MI; Michigan City, IN; Kenosha and Milwaukee, WI; and Duluth, MN.  S- ` x4.` ` On November 19, 1996, PSI, which currently provides AMTS service along the Atlantic,  xPacific, Hawaiian, and Puerto Rican coasts, filed license applications for AMTS stations at Cape Vincent,  xOswego, Rochester, Lewiston, and Buffalo, NY; Pleasant Hill, PA; Lakewood, OH; Port Huron,  xQuanicassie, Oscoda, Goetzville, Stutsmanville, Marquette, and Houghton, MI; Chicago, IL; Sturgeon Bay,  xGreen Bay, and Washburn, WI; and Duluth, MN. On January 17, 1997, PSI filed an application for an  xjAMTS station at Toledo, OH. On February 12, 1998, it filed license applications for AMTS stations at  xWhitehall, MI, and Port Washington, WI. On March 24, 1998, it filed license applications for AMTS  xstations at Alpena and Cooks, MI. On March 27, 1998, it filed an application for an AMTS station at Traverse City, MI.  S - III. DISCUSSION ă  S - ` x5.` ` A proposed AMTS must serve a minimum service area. Section 80.475(a) of the Commission's Rules provides,  `XxAMTS applicants proposing to serve inland waterways must show how the proposed  $system will provide continuity of service along more than 60% of each of one or more  navigable inland waterways. Inland waterways less than 240 kilometers (150 miles) long  Qmust be served in their entirety. AMTS applicants proposing to serve portions of the  `Atlantic, Pacific or Gulf of Mexico coastline must define a substantial navigational area  S-and show how the proposed system will provide continuity of service for it.J * yOm-ԍx47 C.F.R.  80.475(a).J   x-Thus, applicants must propose to provide continuity of service to either sixty percent of a navigable inland  xwaterway or a substantial navigational area of a coastline. While the Commission's rules do not expressly  xydefine "substantial navigational area," we believe that the service area of a single station cannot constitute  S- x=a substantial navigational area.B X* {O-  ԍxSee AMTS Nationwide Order, 6 FCC Rcd at 439440 ("The purpose of these requirements is to provide for  xintegrated systems that offer coverage over marine shipping routes and to exclude from the AMTS band individual  xiVHF coast stations. . . . Local coverage is available through conventional VHF public coast stations. Complaints  xyabout the inconvenience of dealing with a series of individual coast stations, in fact, let to the creation of the AMTS.").B In this connection, we note that the underlying rationale for the AMTS  S- xrules is to authorize systems covering marine routes, rather than individual stations.n * {O}!-  ԍxSee Applications for Authority to Construct and Operate an Automated Maritime Telecommunications  {OG"- xSystem, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 4690, 4690 (1988) ("The scope of the service rule, Section  x80.475, illustrates the system concept in the AMTS. An applicant cannot get a license on AMTS frequencies for  xLjust one station."); Amendment of Parts 2, 81 and 83 of the Commission's rules to Allocate Spectrum for an  xAutomated Inland Waterways Communications System (IWCS) along the Mississippi River and Connecting  {Oi%- xWaterways, Memorandum Opinion and Order, GEN Docket No. 801, 88 FCC 2d 678, 69596 (1981) (IWCS  {O3&-Memorandum Opinion and Order).n Additionally, the  x[delineation of a substantial navigational area should be based on "demographic and other considerations,""R ,l(l(,,M"  S-particularly "coverage over marine shipping routes."Y* {Oh-  ԍxAMTS Nationwide Order, 6 FCC Rcd at 439440; see also Add the Gulf of Mexico to the Authorized  xService Areas of Maritime Mobile Systems Operating in the 216220 MHz Band, 49 Fed. Reg. 4013, 4015 (1984)  x(stating that the particular service requirement for the Gulf of Mexico was defined to "include the major area of  x;activity along the Continental shelf[, which was] the area expected to generate the greatest interest and demand for maritime communications services").Y  S- ` $x6.` ` In their applications, Orion and PSI both contend that they satisfy the AMTS service  xyrequirement because each proposes a system that would provide continuity of service to more than sixty  xpercent of the Great Lakes (as a whole), reflecting their conclusion that the Great Lakes constitute a single  xinland waterway. As an initial matter, we disagree with the applicants' implicit conclusion that the Great  xLLakes collectively constitute a navigable inland waterway within the meaning of Section 80.475(a) of the  xRules. When the Commission changed the rules to permit AMTS nationwide, we believe it was intended  xthat the Great Lakes would be treated as a coastline area, rather than as one or more inland waterways.  x<The Commission stated that the substantial navigational area requirement applies to "AMTS systems along  S- xcoasts, lakes, and bays"; in fact, the reference to lakes pertains to the Great Lakes.ez* {O-ԍxAMTS Nationwide Order, 6 FCC Rcd at 440.e Moreover, this  xinterpretation of Section 80.475(a) of the Commission's Rules is consistent with the exclusion of the Great  S - xLakes from the definition of "inland waters" set forth in the Commission's rules. * {OH-  ԍxSee 47 C.F.R.  80.5 (FCC definition of "inland waters" incorporates Coast Guard definition, which excludes  {O-the Great Lakes, see 33 C.F.R.  2.0520(c), Part 80). Therefore, we have  xconcluded that the Great Lakes are subject to the "substantial navigational area" requirement.  xConsequently, the supplemental information we requested from Orion and PSI was for purposes of  S -determining the substantial navigational area(s) to be served by the proposed system(s) of each applicant.  h * yO -  \ԍxLetter from Michael J. Regiec, Acting Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and  x-Private Wireless Division, to Orion, Ref. No. PS&PWDLTAB666 at 1 (Jan. 9, 1998); Letter from Michael J.  xYRegiec, Acting Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, to PSI, Ref. No. PS&PWDLTAB666 (Jan. 9, 1998).  S - ` x7.` ` Orion applications. Orion contends that the proposed Rochester, Buffalo, Erie, Cleveland,  xToledo, and Detroit stations "will provide continuity of service along the United States coastline from  x approximately 20 miles from the juncture of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River to beyond the  S- xsouthern entrance to Lake Huron," and, according to Orion's engineering data,Xh P * yO-  \ԍxOrion used the standards for computing VHF (156162 MHz) public coast station coverage to predict the  {O- xservice contours of its proposed stations. See 47 C.F.R.  80.75180.773. PSI used the standards for computing  {O - xcochannel interference protection for stations in the 220 MHz band. See 47 C.F.R.  90.723(i), 90.763(b)(1)(i).  x<Neither applicant provided any information regarding whether these standards are applicable to AMTS, whether  xJAMTS receivers are comparable to VHF public coast or 220 MHz receivers, or what the appropriate ratio of desired  yO"- xto undesired signal strength should be for AMTS. We note that Orion predicts continuity of service between stations  xwas far as 90 miles apart, and PSI predicts continuity of service between stations as far as 70 miles apart, while AMTS  {Oq$- x;stations typically are spaced only 30 to 50 miles apart. Maritime Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 17010.  {O;%- xYThe Commission has requested comment on the proper criteria for determining an AMTS station's service area. Id.  xJat 17008. We accept the applicants' use of these criteria to predict the service contours of the proposed stations at  xissue herein, but, pending the outcome of our ongoing proceeding, we reserve discretion to use other criteria in the future.X the predicted service",l(l(,,"  S- xcontours for the proposed stations overlap.J* yOh-ԍxOrion Supplement at 1, 3.J We agree that this expanse, encompassing most of Lake  xOntario, all of Lake Erie, and part of Lake Huron, encompasses significant shipping routes and is a substantial navigational area. These applications therefore will be granted.  S4- ` x8.` ` Orion also states that the proposed Rogers City and Charlevoix stations will provide  xcontinuity of service "around the northern part of Michigan, including service to the critical narrows on  xboth sides of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan," and the proposed stations' predicted service contours  S- xoverlap.BX* {O -ԍxId. at 13.B We conclude that this area, which includes the passage between Lakes Huron and Michigan,  xis of sufficient maritime importance to be considered a substantial navigational area; thus, these applications will also be granted.  S- ` x9.` ` In addition, Orion states that the proposed Muskegon, Michigan City, Kenosha, and  xMilwaukee stations will "provide a continuity of service along the coast of six counties of western  xMichigan, the entire coastal area of Indiana, and then north along the entire coast of Illinois and five  S6 - xcoastal counties of Wisconsin," and the predicted service contours overlap.B6 * {O-ԍxId. at 23.B This system will provide  xcoverage to the shipping routes to and from Chicago, Milwaukee, Gary, IN, and Muskegon, MI, among  xother places. We conclude that the lower half of Lake Michigan constitutes a substantial navigational area. As a result, we will also grant these applications.  S7- ` x 10.` ` Finally, Orion states that the proposed Calumet and Duluth stations will provide service  S- x0"along the busy iron ore shipping coast of Lake Superior."@|* {O -ԍxId. at 2.@ However, even according to Orion's  xengineering data, a vessel making the approximately 170mile passage between Calumet and Duluth would  S- x[be out of range for almost 26 miles, or approximately 15%, of the route.J* {OL-ԍxSee id. at 3.J While the Commission's rules  xLdo not expressly define "continuity of service," we believe that the underlying intent of the AMTS rules  xis to facilitate provision of service to a vessel moving along a waterway. Thus, we believe that continuity  xof service means service that keeps the vessel traveling along that waterway or substantial navigational  S- xarea constantly or almost constantly in range of an AMTS station.EZ* {O-   ԍxSee, e.g., AMTS Nationwide Order, 6 FCC Rcd at 437, 440; IWCS Memorandum Opinion and Order, 84  xFCC 2d at 876, 877, 890 (suggesting that continuity of service for rivers in the Mississippi River system means "riverwide").E As a result, we conclude that this  x15% gap in coverage is too substantial for us to find that these two stations will provide continuity of  xyservice to this substantial navigational area. We nonetheless note Orion's representation that it is seeking  S9- xa suitable location for a third station to close the gap.:9 * {O$-ԍxId.: Rather than grant these applications subject to  xthe condition that an application for the third station is filed and ultimately granted within the construction  xperiod for the Calumet and Duluth stations, we will deny the applications without prejudice to refiling  xthem as part of a proposed system that does provide continuity of service to that substantial navigational"T ,l(l(,," area.  S- ` x 11.` ` PSI applications. We will grant PSI's applications for Cape Vincent, Oswego, Rochester,  xkLewiston, and Buffalo, NY; Pleasant Hill, PA; and Lakewood and Toledo, OH, for the reasons stated  xjabove regarding Orion's Rochester, Buffalo, Erie, Cleveland, Toledo, and Detroit applications, as the two proposed systems will cover roughly the same area.  S- ` x 12.` ` PSI contends that the proposed stations at Quanicassie, Oscoda, Alpena, Goetzville,  xStutsmanville, Traverse City, Chicago, Port Washington, Sturgeon Bay, Green Bay, and Cooks will  xLprovide continuous coverage to the west coast of Lake Huron above Saginaw Bay, the passages between  xLake Huron and Lakes Michigan and Superior, upper Lake Michigan, and the west coast of lower Lake  S- x[Michigan.* {O8 -  MԍxSee PSI Supplement at Ex. 1. Continuity of service to the west coast of Lake Michigan is interrupted by two insignificant gaps (less than four miles each). In addition, the Whitehall station, on the east coast of lower Lake Michigan, will enable this  x.system to provide continuous coverage to vessels on the routes discussed above regarding Orion's lower  xLake Michigan system. We conclude that this system will serve a substantial navigational area; thus, these  x[applications will be granted. According to PSI's engineering data, however, the predicted service contour  xof the proposed Port Huron station overlaps with predicted contour of the proposed Quanicassie station  S - xonly over land.: "* {O-ԍxId.: A maritime vessel traveling between Port Huron and Oscoda (the nearest station by  xkwater) would be out of AMTS range for most of the passage: approximately 52 of 93 miles, or 56%.  xGiven that this gap in coverage is significantly greater than that identified with respect to Orion's proposed  xzCalumet and Duluth stations, we conclude that the Port Huron station does not present continuity of service. As a result, that application will be denied.  S- ` ox 13.` ` Finally, PSI argues that the Marquette, Houghton, Washburn, and Duluth stations, like  xOrion's proposed Calumet and Duluth stations, would provide service to the iron ore shipping coast of  S9- xLake Superior.:9* {O-ԍxId.: Also like the proposed Orion stations, PSI's engineering data reveals that a vessel  xtraveling between Marquette and Duluth would be out of AMTS range for approximately 26 of 300 miles,  x=or 9%; and a vessel traveling between Washburn and Houghton would be out of range for approximately  x15 miles, or 15% of the 100mile route. As we concluded regarding Orion's applications, this gap is too  xLsubstantial for us to find that the proposed stations will provide continuity of service to this substantial  x=navigational area. We nonetheless conclude that the area to which the Marquette and Houghton stations  xkwill provide continuity of service is a substantial navigational area, because the stations will serve the  x0routes past the Keweenaw Peninsula, around which most Lake Superior vessel traffic must pass.  xjTherefore, we will grant the Marquette and Houghton applications. We conclude, however, that the area  xLserved by the Washburn and Duluth stations is not a substantial navigational area because the water area  S;- xcould be covered by one centrallylocated station. As we discussed supra, grant of these applications  S - x=would be inconsistent with our AMTS licensing principles.g F* {O#-ԍxSee AMTS Nationwide Order, 6 FCC Rcd at 439440.g We therefore will deny the Washburn and  xDuluth applications without prejudice. PSI could elect to refile them as part of a proposed system rather than the functional substitute for an individual station. "=,l(l(,,""  S- IV. CONCLUSION ă  S- ` x 14.` ` For the reasons discussed herein, we conclude that the majority of the subject AMTS  xapplications submitted by Orion and PSI are consistent with the Commission's rules, and, thus, will be  xgranted. We further conclude that the remainder of the applications are inconsistent with the Commission's rules; therefore, such applications will be denied.  S- V. ORDERING CLAUSES ă  S5- ` x15.` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority of Section 4(i) and 303(r)  x\of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 1.971,  x80.215, and 80.475 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.971, 80.215, 80.475, the applications of  xNFred Daniel d/b/a Orion Telecom for authorization to construct and operate Automated Maritime  xTelecommunications System stations at Rochester (File No. 879086) and Buffalo (File No. 879087), NY;  xErie, PA (File No. 879091); Cleveland (File No. 879092) and Toledo (File No. 879093), OH; Detroit (File  xMNo. 879094), Rogers City (File No. 879098), Charlevoix (File No. 879097), and Muskegon (File No.  S - x879095), MI; Michigan City, IN (File No. 879090); and Kenosha (File No. 879088) and Milwaukee (File No. 879096), WI ARE GRANTED.  S7- ` &x16.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the applications of Paging Systems, Inc. for  xauthorization to construct and operate Automated Maritime Telecommunications System stations at Cape  xLVincent (File No. 850012), Oswego (File No. 850014), Rochester (File No. 850015), Lewiston (File No.  x850013), and Buffalo (File No. 850011), NY; Pleasant Hill, PA (File No. 850017); Lakewood (File No.  x850016) and Toledo (File No. 850438), OH; Quanicassie (File No. 850007), Oscoda (File No. 850005),  xjAlpena (File No. 851852), Goetzville (File No. 850002), Stutsmanville (File No. 850008), Traverse City  xj(File No. 851855), Whitehall (File No. 851652), Cooks (File No. 851853), Marquette (File No. 850004),  x>and Houghton (File No. 850003), MI; Chicago, IL (File No. 850001); and Port Washington (File No. 851651), Sturgeon Bay (File No. 850019), and Green Bay (File No. 850018), WI ARE GRANTED.  S9- ` Ax17.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the applications of Orion Telecom for authorization to  xconstruct and operate Automated Maritime Telecommunications System stations at Calumet, MI (File No. 879085) and Duluth, MN (File No. 879089) ARE DENIED.  Sm- ` &x18.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the applications of Paging Systems, Inc. for  xauthorization to construct and operate Automated Maritime Telecommunications System stations at Port  xHuron, MI (File No. 850006); Washburn, WI (File No. 850009); and Duluth, MN (File No. 850010) ARE DENIED.  Sn- ` Px19.` ` This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.131, 0.331.  S - " ,l(l(,, $"  S- ` x20.` ` For further information contact Scot Stone, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, at (202) 4180680. x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION  S-x` `  hh   S-x` `  hhD'wana R. Terry x` `  hhChief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division  Si -x` `  hhWireless Telecommunications Bureau