COMMISSIONER AJIT PAIRe:
Promoting Technological Solutions to Combat Contraband Wireless Device Use in Correctional
Facilities, GN Docket No. 13-111.
Late last year, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to explore whether we
should take action to ensure that rates for interstate interexchange inmate calling services are just and
reasonable.1 In that item, we noted that allowing prisoners to maintain regular contact with their family
members can help reduce recidivism.2
But while authorized phone calls placed by those who are incarcerated can produce real benefits,
unauthorized phone calls between prisoners and their associates on the outside can be quite dangerous.
Take the case of Patrick Byers. In mid-2007, Byers was being held in a Baltimore detention center
awaiting trial on a murder charge. Unfortunately, like many of the inmates in that facility, Byers had
access to a contraband cell phone. With his trial only 8 days away, Byers used that cell phone to order the
murder of Carl Lackl, whom Byers’ associates then killed on his front lawn.3 Lackl, a 38 year-old father,
was the prosecution’s key witness to the crime—an innocent man who suffered the sad serendipity of
being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Unfortunately, stories like this one are not uncommon,4 so it’s not an exaggeration to say that
preventing prisoners from making unauthorized phone calls can save lives. Today’s item is an important
step towards achieving that goal. I look forward to reviewing the record that will be compiled in response
to our Notice and hope that we will act quickly to crack down on inmates’ use of contraband wireless
1 See Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services, WC Docket No. 12-375, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 27
FCC Rcd 16629 (2012).
2 Id. at 16631–32, 16646, paras. 3–4, 48, & n.155.
3 Tricia Bishop, Murder on Call, Baltimore Sun (Apr. 26, 2009), available at http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2009-
4 See, e.g., Feds: 25 Charged in Scheme to Smuggle Drugs, Cellphones into Baltimore Jail Facility, Washington
Post (Apr. 23, 2013) (“BGF has become the dominant gang at the prison complex, where members used the
contraband cellphones to arrange drug smuggling and sexual encounters as well as to warn of investigations and
order assaults and murders, according to the court documents.”), available at
facility/2013/04/23/ae12dfd4-ac7c-11e2-9493-2ff3bf26c4b4_story.html; Indictment, U.S. v. White et al., at 10 (D.
Md.) (Criminal No. ELH-13-0151, Apr. 1, 2013) (“The availability of contraband cell phones was the crucial device
to link and coordinate all BGF criminal activity inside and outside the prison facilities.”).
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, , or as plain text.