Commission Denies Tolling For KRZB(FM), Archer City, TX
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Texas Grace Communications
File No. BRH-19960201MB
as modified by BMPH-19990217IB
Request to Toll the Period to Construct Unbuilt
Facility ID No. 79024
Station KRZB(FM), Archer City, TX
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Adopted: July 31, 2014
Released: July 31, 2014
By the Commission:
The Commission has before it an Application for Review filed on January 21, 2009, by
Texas Grace Communications (“Texas Grace”), permittee of unbuilt station KRZB(FM), Archer City,
We affirm herein two December 19, 2008 Media Bureau (“Bureau”) Staff Decisions1 which
denied Texas Grace’s two separate requests for more construction time, and deny review.
The KRZB(FM) construction permit (“Permit”) was granted in 1996 as a “singleton,”
with a then-standard 18 month construction deadline of April 7, 1998. Much of its considerable history is
set forth in the Staff Decisions and in two Commission decisions, Texas Grace I and II. Texas Grace I
provided three additional construction years by waiver of the Commission rule relating to broadcast
construction periods, Section 73.3598(a).2
We have reviewed the record, conclude that the Bureau properly decided the matters
raised below, and uphold the Staff Decisions for the reasons stated therein. We specifically note that there
is no basis for Texas Grace’s contention that it has not received adequate time to complete station
construction. Indeed, according to our calculations the permittee has received more time than the
additional 36-month period granted in Texas Grace I.3
1 See Letter from Peter Doyle, Chief, Audio Division to Dave Garey, Ref. 1800B3-MJW (MB Dec. 19, 2008) (“Staff
Decision I”); Letter from Peter Doyle, Chief, Audio Division to Dave Garey, Ref. 1800B3-IB (MB Dec. 19, 2008)
(“Staff Decision II”) (collectively, the “Staff Decisions”).
2 See Texas Grace Communications, 16 FCC Rcd 19167, (2001) (“Texas Grace I”) (adding three years by waiver of
the rule to period of more than three years received between 1996 and 2001); Texas Grace Communications, 20
FCC Rcd 4820 (2005) (“Texas Grace II”) (dismissing, as untimely, Texas Grace’s Application for Review and
Petition for Reconsideration, and declining to provide it more time due to other events). The Commission granted
Texas Grace additional time by waiving 47 C.F.R. § 73.3598(a), rather than, as Texas Grace had requested, by
tolling the construction period pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 73.3598(b), because Texas Grace’s circumstances did not
meet those specified in that rule section and also because permittees that had already received at least three
unencumbered years from original grant no longer qualified for tolling. See Texas Grace I, 16 FCC Rcd at 19174,
n.13 (noting that Texas Grace had already received over four years to construct); 1998 Biennial Review,
Streamlining of Mass Media Applications, Rules, and Processes, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 23056, 23090-93
(1998), modified in part, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 17525, 17538-40 (1999) (“Streamlining”).
3 Texas Grace I at 19174. We calculate that Texas Grace received approximately 44 unencumbered months since
Texas Grace I, albeit in three segments of 19 months, 5 1/2 months, and 19 1/2 months each. Specifically, the three-
year period began on October 26, 2001, and ran unencumbered until an error by the Federal Aviation Administration
(“FAA”) on June 5, 2003 (a period of approximately 19 months). The FAA error was resolved three years later on
June 5, 2006. When the Commission reinstated the KRZB license for these FAA matters it provided 25 months to
Federal Communications Commission
Texas Grace’s argument is premised on its apparent belief that when, in 2001, the
Commission extended its Permit by three years, it entitled Texas Grace to a “clean, unencumbered,
protected-rights construction permit for a seamless full term 3-year period of time.”4 The Commission
expressed no intent whatsoever that the KRZB(FM) construction period, if interrupted by events
subsequent to that ruling, should result in the award of a new three-year construction period without
regard to unencumbered time already elapsed.5 The permittee’s expansive reading of Texas Grace I is
entirely inconsistent with the goal of the Commission’s strict broadcast station construction policy – to
provide a sense of urgency for prompt initiation and completion of construction by eliminating practices
that could be used to “tie up” spectrum indefinitely.6 The starts and stops of the construction period
clock, which Texas Grace considers “encumbrance[s] of the worst magnitude,”7 are not encumbrances at
all, but rather the result of the routine application of the Streamlining licensing policy which requires
diligent construction efforts when a permit is unencumbered but which holds a permittee harmless for
those periods when the permit is encumbered by the events specified in Section 73.3598(b) or by events
of a similar magnitude found to warrant a waiver of Section 73.3598(a) . Despite having repeatedly
petitioned for and benefited from such tolling, Texas Grace has failed to timely construct its station.
Under these circumstances, nearly 18 years after the initial grant of the Permit to Texas Grace, we agree
with the Bureau that it was not entitled to additional time to do so.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 5(c)(5) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended,8 and Section 1.115(g) of the Commission’s Rules,9 the
Application for Review filed by Texas Grace Communications IS DENIED.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Marlene H. Dortch
(Continued from previous page)
complete construction – well more than the balance which remained on the three-year Texas Grace I period. That
25-month period then ran unencumbered from resolution of the FAA matter on June 5, 2006 through November 16,
2006 (approximately 5 ½ months) when it became encumbered again by a petition by LKCM Radio Group, LP.
Following dismissal of that petition on August 22, 2008, the Permit ran unencumbered through the Permit’s revised
expiration date of April 9, 2010, a period of 19 months and 18 days.
4 Application for Review at 2-3.
5 Indeed, the Commission believed at that time that, having already received over four years to construct the station,
plus the additional three that the Commission granted it, Texas Grace would not receive any additional time beyond
the extended deadline of October 26, 2004 regardless of any circumstances that might arise. See Texas Grace I, 16
FCC Rcd at 19174 n.13. See also Texas Grace II, 20 FCC Rcd at 4824.
6 See Streamlining, 14 FCC Rcd at 17539.
7 Application for Review at 3.
8 47 U.S.C. § 155(c)(5).
9 47 C.F.R. § 1.115(g).
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.