Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Commissioner Clyburn Remarks, Georgia Green Economy Summit

Download Options

Released: September 28, 2012

Prepared Remarks of FCC Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn

Georgia Green Economy Summit

“Networking the Green Economy”

Atlanta, Georgia

September 27, 2012


Thank you, Mr. Wright, for that generous introduction, and Albert George, it’s great
seeing you again. Today’s agenda firmly addresses two issues that I am very passionate about –
government and private industry efforts that would advance our Nation’s energy efficiency and
independence; and improving opportunities for low income communities.
I’ve been very interested in energy efficiency and independence, at least since 1998,
when I began my term as a member of the South Carolina Public Service Commission. As for
empowering communities, one could say this issue is also in my blood, as both of my parents
were notably involved with the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 60s.
In my capacity as a Public Service Commissioner, and in my current role as a
communications Commissioner at the FCC, I remain concerned about the impact of regulatory
and public interest policies on all communities. By that I mean, policies that impact energy
companies and communications service companies, should also benefit the entities and
communities that may not have the resources to hire powerful lobbyists and advocates who
routinely visit me in Washington, DC.
To be a part of this assembly of distinguished speakers and thought leaders on energy
efficiency who are committed to bring those benefits to all communities, including low income
communities in the United States and in lesser developed countries, is a privilege I was
determined not to miss.
When I first saw that title of the topic Albert asked me to address, “Networking the Green
Economy,” I smiled. That is because Albert is familiar enough with my personal and
professional DNA to know that for me, the term “networking” has two meanings. On the one
hand, there are communications networks, and what the Federal Communications Commission
and relevant federal government agencies are doing to promote the development of these
platforms that would also benefit the Green Economy.
But of course, “networking” also means meeting and collaborating with others, of similar
professional interests, to see how they can help each other. I have seen how both aspects of the
term “networking”, in their best forms, are important to our Nation’s interests in improving
communications services and improving energy efficiency and independence.

Importance of Broadband Networks to the Nation

When I started at the FCC in the summer of 2009, the number one priority for the agency
was complying with a Congressional mandate in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act,
to develop a national plan that would enable all people in our Nation, to have access to broadband
technology. The Recovery Act specifically directed that we consider how broadband could
advance a number of national priorities, and that list of national priorities, rightly included energy
efficiency and independence, education, health care, and employment. Congress gave the FCC a
year to prepare this plan, a rather ambitious mandate for a single federal agency.

But the FCC wasted no time and got to work. The Chairman appointed a task force to
develop the National Broadband Plan and in March 2010, it was released. The over 350 pages
includes hundreds of findings and recommendations, that fortunately for you and for me, I do not
have time to recap. But what I would like to share this morning are a few of the most important
findings and recommendations that relate to promoting a Green Economy.
The Plan found that approximately 18 million Americans live in areas with absolutely no
access to wired or wireless broadband networks. For those Americans who do have access to
broadband in their communities, about 100 million do not subscribe to it at home. To reach the
goal of having everyone in America benefit from wired and wireless broadband networks, the
federal government must be focused on policies that promote both the deployment and adoption
of broadband services.
At the time of the Plan’s release, the Commission unanimously embraced six core
principles that should guide our efforts as we work to implement the policy recommendations in
the Plan. What I am most proud of, is that at the very top of the priority list was ensuring that all
communities benefitted from this Plan. The number one principle was, and I quote: “[e]very
American should have a meaningful opportunity to benefit from the broadband communications
era—regardless of geography, race, economic status, disability, residence on tribal land, or degree
of digital literacy.”
We have been hard at work implementing the specific recommendations since its
publication, but among the most difficult tasks put forth involved changing the Commission’s
policy approaches to the federal universal service fund and to wireless spectrum allocation and
management. In October 2011, the FCC took a significant step in reforming the high-cost portion
of USF and the intercarrier compensation regime. Together, this effort involved an almost $9
billion a year regime that has supported the delivery of telephone service in rural areas for over
15 years. The comprehensive reform is designed to increase accountability and efficiency,
encourage targeted investment in broadband infrastructure, and emphasize the importance of
broadband to the future of these programs. Implementation of the reforms is ongoing, and today,
the FCC is scheduled to hold our first-ever reverse auction, for one-time funding to extend
wireless broadband to areas that currently have no access.
There are other agency efforts related to our broadband goals, and tomorrow, the FCC
will vote on a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, that proposes rules for the first ever voluntary
incentive auction held in the world. This auction will enable the Commission to reallocate a
substantial amount of spectrum for commercial mobile broadband services from area broadcasters
so that wireless companies can keep with the demand of Americans for more mobile broadband
In the past, the FCC’s efforts to find more spectrum for mobile wireless services
consisted of working with NTIA, an agency that manages spectrum allocation for federal
agencies, to repurpose this spectrum for commercial purposes. But, this is a multi-year process.
The voluntary incentive auctions will give broadcast licensees a chance to relinquish their
spectrum in return for compensation, if they so choose. If we design the incentive auction
correctly, we will strengthen both our mobile wireless and broadcast television industries, and
augment the efforts being addressed today.

The National Broadband Plan’s Recommendations for the Green Economy

In the area of energy policy, the National Broadband Plan devoted much attention to the
way that broadband infrastructure can aid the deployment of smart grid technologies. The Plan
makes a number of recommendations for all relevant private and public stakeholders that fall into
two broad categories. The first includes recommendations that provide flexibility to utility
companies to find the right communications network to deploy Smart Grid technologies best
suited for their needs. Currently, electric utilities tend to develop private proprietary narrowband
networks in order to provide and maintain a reliable two way network. The Plan recognizes that
commercial wireless networks are being used for many Smart Grid applications, particularly
metering and routine sensing systems.
However, current regulation may create economic disincentives for utility companies to
choose to implement commercial networks. For instance, since utility companies are traditionally
rate-of-return regulated utilities, they typically earn guaranteed profits on the assets they
deploy—including private communications networks—but only receive cost recovery if they use
commercial networks. This current state of regulation creates disincentives for utility companies
to use commercial communications networks.
Therefore, the Plan recommends that public utility commissions evaluate a utility’s
network requirements and commercial network alternatives, before authorizing a rate-of-return on
private networks. It further encourages PUCs to let recurring network operating costs qualify for
a rate of return similar to capitalized utility-built networks.
The second category of the Plan’s recommendations that I think is important includes
those that seek to empower consumers by giving them access to real time information about their
energy use. Traditionally, consumers have been passive recipients of energy. They typically
only interact with their energy providers to pay a monthly bill based on fixed rates. As a result of
this limited involvement, consumers have little insight into how their day-to-day activities impact
their energy bills.
If we want the Smart Grid to promote energy efficiency as much as possible, then we
need our consumers to participate much more in energy management and conservation. The
National Broadband Plan estimates, that “simply providing consumers better information about
their energy use will “reduce total consumption by 5–15%, equating to savings of $60–180 per
year for the average American household.” Therefore, we should create incentives for consumers
to participate willingly, in the solutions for energy management. Consumers have varying
objectives, competencies and preferences, therefore simple, easy-to-use products and services
will give them greater choice and control.
The deployment and adoption of smart grid technologies could have a profound
beneficial impact on the Nation’s economy. Smart grid technology and implementation, will
require the manufacturing and installation of meters, relays, switching gear, and other hardware
products. Creating and installing this technology, will require a multi-disciplined, labor-intensive
effort that will not only create jobs in the near term, but a sustainable job market for years to
The U.S. Department of Commerce estimates that the smart grid could help reduce power
demand by 20 percent, will lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, and will give us the
opportunity to develop a highly innovative sector of the economy, creating new and high-skilled
jobs. The Recovery Act smart grid investments alone are projected to directly create 43,000 jobs

and support another 61,000 in the private sector. It is for these reasons that President Obama has
directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, or OSTP in the White House, to promote
the deployment of the smart grid.

The Importance of Collaboration and Networking to the Green Economy

I have long held the view, that in order to successfully meet the most difficult of policy
challenges, regulators need to cast as wide a net as possible, and seek input and collaboration
from all relevant stakeholders. There are several benefits to this approach.
I have found that when it comes to developing regulatory policy, one size does not fit all.
The best way to ensure that regulatory policies do not have unintended negative consequences on
consumers and other stakeholders, is to get their input early and often. Also, comprehensive
reform is, in the long run, usually more cost effective than piecemeal reform. Proper
comprehensive reform usually precludes the need to retrofit policies to accommodate parties, who
should not have been excluded from the process in the first place.
Engaging all relevant stakeholders was critical to the success of the National Broadband
Plan. To ensure that the plan would help as many interested parties as possible, the Commission
staff held 36 public workshops, nine field hearings, and released 31 public notices, that produced
more than 75,000 pages of public comments.
Broad collaboration was also key to the Commission’s reform of its Universal Service
Fund policies. Such reform had been attempted by the FCC several times in the last ten years, but
these new reforms were possible this time, in part, due to the significant collaborative efforts
between the public and private sector. Industry was able to come together and agree on major
points of the reform, which assisted our efforts to move forward with an overall reform Order.
Such collaboration was possible this time because the markets had shifted—providers were
beginning to see their revenues decline for certain services, and demand for broadband
technologies and services had increased. While not perfect, we will continue to make
adjustments as needed. But we wouldn’t be where we are today—without the continued dialogue
and collaboration between all interested parties.
Although as a federal agency, most of our efforts are focused on what policies to adopt,
the Commission has recognized that, if we think outside of the box, regulation is not the only way
to achieve the goals of the National Broadband Plan. The staff has been trying to promote public-
private partnerships as another way to achieve these goals. One example is Connect to Compete,
an initiative launched by the Federal Communications Commission, with the specific goal of
getting more U.S. families to adopt broadband at home. Thanks to Connect to Compete, many
cable companies offer Internet service for $9.95 per month, to homes with children that are
eligible for free school lunches.
The initiative also includes Microsoft Corp., which pledges to sell PCs with its Office
software suite for $250 to low-income families. Redemtech is offering to sell refurbished
computers for $150, including shipping. For those who cannot afford those prices, Morgan
Stanley is pledging to develop a microfinance lending program for community-based financial
institutions. To help address the lack of interest and computer skills, Best Buy Co., Microsoft and
nonprofits such as America's Promise Alliance and United Way are promising to support the
initiative with training.


It is only by working collaboratively to implement recommendations that are designed to
promote greater deployment and adoption of broadband services, that we’ll be best able to
promote key national priorities like energy efficiency and independence. As the relevant
stakeholders work towards a Green Economy Strategy for Georgia, the FCC can serve as a
resource for possible ways to design a strategy that can leverage our work and that of the federal
government in these related areas. So if and when my Office can ever serve as a resource to you,
I hope you will not hesitate to call, write, tweet or email. Thank you very much.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.