Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Complaint of Costa De Oro Television, Inc. against United CableTelevision of East San Fernando Valley, Inc. Request for Signal Carriage

Download Options

Released: January 19, 1996



Washington, DC 20554

DA 95-2468

In re:



Complaint of Costa De Oro Television, Inc.
) CSR-4604-M
against United Cable Television of East San Fernando
Valley, Inc.





Adopted: December 12, 1995 Released: January 19, 1996

By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau:


1. Costa De Or Television, Inc., permittee of Station KSTV (Channel 57), Ventura,
California, has filed a "Complaint," along with a later supplement and a motion for leave to file
it, pursuant to §614(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and §§76.7 and 76.61
of the Commission's Rules, requesting carriage of its signal by United Cable Television of East
San Fernando Valley Ltd. ("United"), operator of cable television systems located in the San
Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles, California. United has filed an opposition to this
"Complaint," after which KSTV filed a reply to it along with a second supplement and a motion
for leave to file it.1



2. According to KSTV, because its community of license, Ventura, California, is in the

1 Recognizing that Commission rules do not contemplate the filing of supplements, KSTV asks
the Commission to accept them, because they will afford a more complete record upon which to
base a decision, and because they address issues which the station could not have done previously.


Los Angeles, California "area of dominant influence" (or "ADI"), it is entitled to mandatory
carriage on United's system, pursuant to §76.56(b) of the Commission's Rules. In support of this
claim, KSTV submits letters from Arbitron which it says confirm its belief that it was included in
the Los Angeles ADI, when the 1991-1992 Television ADI Market Guide was published,
although the letters also mention that KSTV chose to be included in the Santa Barbara-Santa
Maria-San Luis Obispo ADI for "reporting purposes." KSTV denies that it ever made such a
choice and states that United has 77 activated channels, and that the system is required to devote
up to one-third of them to the transmission of commercial local broadcast stations, pursuant to
§76.56(b)(2), which it has not yet done. KSTV adds that it is a Spanish language station, and
that it advised United that it planned to seek mandatory carriage by letter dated December 6,
1994. Thereafter, United's General Manager, Kurt Taylor, informed the station that it likely
would commence carriage of the station on Channel 23 about November 1, 1995. However, by
letter dated September 22, 1995, KSTV was informed that United would not carry it, so the
station filed this complaint within sixty days, pursuant to §76.7(c)(4)(iii) of the Commission's
Rules. According to Mr. Walter F. Ulloa, President of Costa De Or Television, Inc., the station
has already spent $2,950.00 for a high quality receive antenna to improve its signal, and lack of
carriage by United would have "disastrous consequences" to KSTV. In its supplement, KSTV
states that economic circumstances forced it to switch from an independent Spanish language
format to an independent English language format as of November 1, 1995, but that if it is
granted mandatory carriage on cable systems in the Los Angeles area, it should be able to reach
enough homes to enable it to revert to Spanish programming.2

3. United also notes that KSTV no longer has a Spanish language format and contends
that there is no inconsistency between the station's physical location in Ventura
County, which is in the Los Angeles, California ADI, and its assignment for other purposes to
the Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-San Luis Obispo, California ADI. Citing the Commission's prior
decision concerning this very issue in Complaints of Costa De Or Television, Inc.,3 United adds
that this "Complaint " merely constitutes an abuse of Commission processes.

4. KSTV argues in reply that it did not abuse Commission processes because it had to
file this complaint to preserve its carriage rights in the event that it eventually prevails on an
earlier case that is presently on review with the Commission.4 KSTV adds that it ". . . has never
chosen to serve the Santa Barbara ADI/DMA. It has always chosen to serve the Los Angeles
ADI/DMA and its large Spanish speaking market." According to KSTV, Arbitron can find no

2 With its supplement, KSTV also submitted eight letters deploring the format change, including
several from local educators, such as the Instructional Dean of Ventura College, Dr. Jaime Casillas.
3 10 FCC Rcd 9468, 9472 (1995).
4 Ibid.


records in its files that KSTV ever requested being treated as a station in the Santa Barbara ADI,5
and therefore any assignment to that ADI by Arbitron was erroneous and cannot justify any
Commission action on that basis.


5. Initially, we note that we will accept KSTV's supplements for the reasons given by the
station. However, §76.55(e) of the Commission's Rules clearly specifies that the market of a
commercial television broadcast station, such as KSTV, is the ADI assigned by Arbitron's 1991-
1992 Television ADI Market Guide, whether or not this is the same market that the station itself
would choose if asked, and a commercial station is entitled to request mandatory carriage on any
cable system operating either in its assigned ADI or in its home county, pursuant to §§76.56(b)
and 76.55(e)(3) of the Commission's Rules. As the Commission explained when it adopted these
rules: ". . . ADI designations will be set for a three-year period designed to coincide with the
three-year election time frame for the must-carry/retransmission consent election. We believe
that this procedure will allow us to take into account changing markets while at the same time
providing stability for the affected parties."6 We have also indicated before that: ". . . parties are
entitled to rely on the 1991-1992 Television ADI Market Guide for determining a station's
television market for signal carriage purposes."7 KSTV is located for must-carry purposes in the
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-San Luis Obispo, California ADI, and it has carriage rights in that
ADI, as well as in its home county, Ventura, California.8 Accordingly, KSTV is not entitled to
mandatory carriage on United's system serving the East San Fernando Valley in the Los Angeles,
California ADI, pursuant either to §76.55(a)(3) or to §76.56(b) of the Rules.9



5 In support of this assertion, KSTV submits a "Declaration" signed by Arbitron's Manager of
Radio Database Quality, James Alvey, that the company has not retained any of the files requested
by KSTV ". . . due to the fact that Arbitron shut down its television service as of October of 1993 . . .
6 See, Report and Order in MM Dockets No. 92-259, 90-4, and 92-295, 8 FCC Rcd 2965, 2975
7 We note that Arbitron assigned KSTV to the same ADI in its 1992-1993 Television ADI Market
as it did in its 1991-1992 Guide.
8 In situations such as this where a station's home county is located outside its assigned ADI, the
Commission has specifically recognized the station's carriage rights in both places. Report and
8 FCC Rcd at 2975.
9 See, Complaints of Costa De Or Television, supra, recon. pending.


6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, That the "Complaint" (CSR-4604-M) filed October
16, 1995, by Costa De Oro Television, Inc., licensee of Station KSTV (Channel 57), Ventura,
California, IS DISMISSED in accordance with §614(d)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended (47 U. S. C. §534) and 47 CFR §76.61(b) (2).

7. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by §0.321 of the Commission's




Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.