Creation of a Low Power Radio Service
Washington, D.C. 20554
April 9, 2012
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Auction No. 83 Translator Dismissal PolicyFourth Report and Order
MM Docket No. 99-25
MB Docket No. 07-172
Released: March 19, 2012
This Guide is prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 212 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. It is intended to help
small entities—small businesses, small organizations (non-profits), and small
governmental jurisdictions—comply with the new rules adopted in the above-
referenced FCC rulemaking docket(s). This Guide is not intended to replace the
rules and, therefore, final authority rests solely with the rules. Although we have
attempted to cover all parts of the rules that might be especially important to small
entities, the coverage may not be exhaustive. This Guide may, perhaps, not apply in
a particular situation based upon the circumstances, and the FCC retains the
discretion to adopt approaches on a case-by-case basis that may differ from this
Guide, where appropriate. Any decisions regarding a particular small entity will be
based on the statute and regulations.
In any civil or administrative action against a small entity for a violation of rules,
the content of the Small Entity Compliance Guide may be considered as evidence of
the reasonableness or appropriateness of proposed fines, penalties or damages.
Interested parties are free to file comments regarding this Guide and the
appropriateness of its application to a particular situation; the FCC will consider
whether the recommendations or interpretations in the Guide are appropriate in
that situation. The FCC may decide to revise this Guide without public notice to
reflect changes in the FCC’s approach to implementing a rule, or to clarify or
update the text of the Guide. Direct your comments and recommendations, or calls
for further assistance, to the FCC’s Consumer Center:
TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322)
Objectives of the proceeding
The objective of this proceeding is to resume the processing of approximately 6,500 pending
translator applications from Auction No. 83 in a manner that most faithfully implements Section 5 of the
Local Community Radio Act of 2010 (“LCRA”). Section 5 of the LCRA sets forth criteria that the
Commission must take into account when licensing FM translator, FM booster and LPFM stations.
Specifically, it requires the FCC, when licensing new FM translator stations, FM booster stations, and low-
power FM stations, to ensure that (1) licenses are available to FM translator stations, FM booster stations,
and low-power FM stations; (2) such decisions are made based on the needs of the local community; and (3)
FM translator stations, FM booster stations, and low-power FM stations remain equal in status and secondary
to existing and modified FM stations.
The LCRA necessarily requires the Commission to make choices between licensing new LPFM and
translator stations in some cases, given that the two services compete for the same limited spectrum. The
next LPFM window presents a critical, and indeed possibly a last, opportunity to nurture and promote a
community radio service that can respond to unmet listener needs and underserved communities in many
urban areas. The processing policy adopted in the Fourth Report and Order is designed to facilitate to the
maximum extent possible the grant of the pending translator applications in all markets, while at the same
time ensuring that adequate spectrum remains available for the upcoming LPFM filing window. To
determine LPFM opportunities in major markets, the Media Bureau (“Bureau”) undertook a nationwide
LPFM spectrum availability analysis. The Bureau studied all top 150 radio markets, plus markets with 4 or
more pending translator applications, centering a thirty-minute latitude by thirty-minute longitude grid over
the center-city coordinates of each studied market. Each grid consisted of 961 points – 31 points running
east/west by 31 points running north/south (“31x31 grid”). The Bureau analyzed each of the 100 FM
channels at each grid point to determine whether any channels remained available for future LPFM stations
at that location. Any market in which the number of available LPFM channels was below a specified LPFM
channel floor was defined as being “spectrum-limited”, and any market in which the number of available
LPFM channels met or exceeded the applicable LPFM channel floor was defined as “spectrum available.”
The Fourth Report and Order also modifies the May 1, 2009, date restriction to allow pending FM
translator applications that are granted to be used as cross-service translators, i.e., to rebroadcast the signal of
a local AM station. This change will allow AM stations to serve their local communities better by, for
example, providing pre-sunrise and post-sunset coverage of traffic, weather, news and sports programming,
thereby promoting the Commission’s goals of localism, competition, and diversity in the broadcast media.
Rules That the Commission Amended
The Fourth Report and Order adopts a market-specific, spectrum availability-based
translator application processing policy. Specifically, it sets forth a processing policy in
which the Commission will impose a national application cap of 50 and/or a one application
per applicant per market in the markets identified in Appendix A of the Fourth Report and
Order. It directs the Media Bureau to issue a Public Notice asking applicants affected by
the caps to identify applications for continued processing, consistent with these limits. Upon
completion of this selection/dismissal process, the Bureau will process the remaining
applications in “spectrum available” markets. Applicants that file amendments in these
markets must demonstrate that their amended applications will not preclude any LPFM
channel/point combination identified in the grid studies. Those applications that fail to do so
will be dismissed.
Applicants with proposals remaining in “spectrum limited” markets will also be given one
opportunity to modify their proposals to eliminate all preclusive impacts on certain protected
LPFM channel/point combinations. Applications that conflict with protected channel/point
combinations and that are not amended to eliminate all such conflicts will be dismissed.
The Fourth Report and Order also modifies certain recently adopted FM translator service
rule changes as a result of the enactment of the LCRA. Specifically, it modifies the date
restriction contained in Section 74.1232(d) of the Rules to allow pending FM translator
applications that are granted to be used as cross-service translators.
Impact on Small BusinessThese rule modifications will have no significant adverse impact on small entities. In fact, the
adopted policies offer significant benefits to small entities. Specifically, the market-based processing
approach ensures additional spectrum for LPFM stations in markets in which it is most limited while also
ensuring the immediate licensing of translator stations in communities in which ample spectrum remains for
both services, including many major markets.
Removing the date restriction contained in Section 74.1232(d) of the Rules to allow pending FM
translator applications that are granted to be used as cross-service translators will also benefit small entities
because it will expand opportunities for translator licensees to rebroadcast AM service.
Steps a Small Entity Must Take to Comply with the Translator Dismissal PolicyAuction No. 83 translator applicants must comply with the dismissal procedures in the
Parties with more than 50 pending applications nationally and/or more than one pending
application in the markets identified in Appendix A must identify their pending applications
for which they seek further Commission processing, consistent with the national and market-
Parties with applications in the top 150 spectrum-available markets may file amendments
demonstrating that their applications will not preclude any LPFM channel/point combination
identified in the grid studies. Those applications that fail to do so will be dismissed.
· Parties with applications in the top 150 spectrum-limited markets (within the studied 31x31
grid) must amend their applications to eliminate all preclusive impacts on protected LPFM
channel/point combinations. An applicant in a top 50 spectrum-limited market proposing
facilities outside the studied 31x31 grid also will need to demonstrate either that no LPFM
station could be licensed at the proposed transmitter site or, if an LPFM station could be
licensed at the site, that an additional channel remains available for a future LPFM station at
the same site (“Top 50 Market Preclusion Showing”). Applications that conflict with
protected channel/point combinations or fail to make such a Top 50 Market Preclusion
Showing and that are not amended to come into compliance with these requirements will be
Steps a Small Entity Must Take to Retransmit an AM Station’s Signal on an FM
In order to retransmit an AM station on an FM translator station, a small entity that operates
an AM station must:
Identify an FM translator that meets the eligibility criteria (authorized by a license or
construction permit in effect as of May 1, 2009, or pursuant to an application that was
pending as of May 1, 2009, and with a 60 dBu contour that does not extend beyond the
smaller of (a) the 2 mV/m daytime contour of the AM station, or (b) a 25-mile radius from
the transmitter site). (If an FM translator is authorized to operate locally but its contour
exceeds the permitted area, it may be possible to apply on FCC Form 349 for a minor
modification of the translator’s license to meet the criteria.)
Either enter into a rebroadcast agreement with the licensee of the translator or enter into an
agreement to purchase the translator, subject to FCC approval (on FCC Form 345).
On any form filed with the FCC, identify the AM station as the primary station to be
retransmitted by the translator station. If there is only a retransmission agreement, the
licensee of the translator must notify the FCC by letter of the change in primary station and
certify that it has written consent from the licensee of the AM station for the retransmission
of that station’s signal (47 C.F.R. § 74.1284(b)).
Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements
The Fourth Report and Order requires Auction No. 83 applicants to identify which applications they
wish to preserve to come into compliance with the national and market-based caps. This will enable the
Commission to move quickly through a backlog of applications that have been pending since 2003 and open
a new filing window for the LPFM service.
The Fourth Report and Order and Third Order on Reconsideration; FCC 12-29, adopted and
released March 19, 2012.
· Creation of a Low Power Radio Service, Amendment of Service and Eligibility Rules for FM
Broadcast Translator Stations. 77 Fed. Reg. 21002 (April 9, 2012) (Final rule.)
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.