Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

FCC Denies Application for Review by Bill R. Wright

Download Options

Released: April 3, 2013

Federal Communications Commission

FCC 13-42

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of


Bill R. Wright d/b/a


KEGG Communications and


KXVI Communications

Facility ID No. 93413
Former Licensee of Deleted FM Translator )
File No. BLFT-20041122AHW
Station DK213EB, Greenville, Texas )
File No. BRFT-20050926AAE

Adopted: April 3, 2013

Released: April 3, 2013

By the Commission:
The Commission has under consideration an Application for Review filed on March 16,
2006, by Bill R. Wright, d/b/a KEGG Communications and KXVI Communications (“KEGG”), licensee
of deleted FM Translator station DK213EB, Greenville, Texas. KEGG seeks review of the February 28,
2006, action by the Media Bureau (the “Bureau”) dismissing as untimely its petition for reconsideration1
of the cancellation of DK213EB’s license and the dismissal of its license renewal application as moot.
Upon review of the Application for Review and the entire record, we conclude that
KEGG has failed to demonstrate that the Bureau erred. The Staff Decision properly decided the matters
raised and we uphold its decision for the reasons stated therein. KEGG argues for the first time on review
that: (1) the medical condition of its consulting engineer (who apparently was responsible for filing its
documents with the Commission) “may have been” the cause of its untimely reconsideration petition; (2)
the cancellation of the Station’s license would be a disadvantage to the community it served; and (3) the
Commission should reinstate the license to provide KEGG an opportunity to consider donating or selling
it to another nonprofit entity. Because the staff was not afforded an opportunity to pass on those
arguments, we need not consider them.2
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 5(c)(5) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended,3 and Section 1.115(g) of the Commission’s rules,4 the
Application for Review IS DENIED. 5
Marlene H. Dortch

1 Letter to KEGG Communications, Ref. 1800B3 (MB Feb. 28, 2006) (“Staff Decision”).
2 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.115(c).
3 47 U.S.C. § 155(c)(5).
4 47 C.F.R. § 1.115(g).
5 We note that, on March 17, 2006, KEGG filed an additional application for renewal of license for DK213EB. See
File No. BRFT-20060317AFQ. In light of our action herein, we direct the Bureau to dismiss that application.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.