Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Florida Intercategory Waiver

Download Options

Released: June 20, 2014

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-850

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of Application of



State of Florida


File No. 0005902069


Request for Waiver of Intercategory Sharing


Freeze in the 800 MHz Frequency Band



Adopted: June 20, 2014

Released: June 20, 2014

By the Deputy Chief, Policy and Licensing Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau:


On August 20, 2013, as part of a larger application, the State of Florida (Florida) sought a

waiver of the freeze on intercategory sharing1 to license two Business/Industrial/Land Transportation

(B/ILT) channel frequencies in the Eustis, Florida area.2

In its waiver request Florida states that a waiver

is warranted because there are no available public safety channels available for licensing at its Eustis site.

For the reasons stated below, we deny the waiver request.


In support of its waiver request Florida states that it incorporated the requested B/ILT

frequencies into its statewide channel plan in February 2013.3

It asserts that, due to the complexity of its

system, it could not accommodate subsequent changes to its channel plan without significantly affecting

its 800 MHz rebanding schedule.4

However, subsequent to Florida “freezing” its channel plan but prior

to it filing its application and waiver request specifying the B/ILT frequencies, a frequency search

revealed that public safety channels were available for use at the Eustis site.5

Moreover, in February

2014, another frequency search revealed that multiple Vacated Spectrum channels were available at the


Florida, however, maintains that these public safety frequencies are unsuitable because, to use

them, Florida would have to spend 1-2 years reprograming

20,000 subscriber units.7


Recently the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau held that it would not grant

requests for waiver of the intercategory sharing rule if, at the time the Bureau reaches the request, the

premise of the waiver request – that no suitable channels in the petitioner’s service are available – is no

1 See Inter-Category Sharing of Private Mobile Radio Frequencies in the 806-821/851-866 MHz Bands, Order, 10

FCC Rcd 7350 (WTB 1995).

2 See FCC File No. 0005902069. The state sought a total of 15 frequencies. See also State of Florida Waiver

Request, dated July 26, 2013, attached to FCC File No. 0005902069 (Waiver Request).

3 Waiver Request at 2.

4 Id.

5 Id. See also Letter dated August 12, 2013 from Carol DiCaro, AFC Processor APCO International, Inc. to Federal

Communications Commission, attached to FCC File No. 0005902069 (2013 Frequency Search Letter).


Letter dated February 10, 2014 from Carol DiCaro, AFC Processor APCO International, Inc. to Federal

Communications Commission, attached to FCC File No. 0005902069 (2014 Frequency Search Letter)

7 Letter dated February 5, 2014 from Leon Simmonds, SLERS Frequency Manager, Florida Department of

Management Services, Division of Telecommunications to Federal Communications Commission, attached to FCC

File No. 0005902069.


Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-850

longer factually correct.8

Furthermore, Commission precedent holds that an applicant seeking a waiver

faces a high hurdle and must plead with particularity the facts and circumstances that warrant a waiver.9


It is clear that at the time Florida filed its waiver request and application it knew the premise

that no public safety channels were available was no longer correct. Indeed, Florida has even failed to

demonstrate that no public safety channels were available when it “froze” its frequency plan in February

2013. Thus, when Florida created a frequency plan that required a waiver of the Commission’s rules, it

assumed the risk that the waiver would be denied for failure to meet the Commission’s waiver criteria.

That has come to pass. Merely detailing for us the magnitude of the risk Florida decided to undertake is

insufficient to warrant grant of the waiver.


Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934,

as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Section 1.925 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.925, that the

waiver request filed by the State of Florida in connection with application FCC File No. 0005902069 IS




consistent with this Order and the Commission’s rules.


This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191(a) and 0.392 of the

Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.191(a), 0.392.


Michael J. Wilhelm

Deputy Chief, Policy and Licensing Division

Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau

8 See Weld, County of, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, DA 14-718, rel. May 27, 2014.

9 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff’d, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied,

409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968));

Birach Broadcasting Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 1414, 1415 ¶ 6 (2003).


Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.