Washington, D.C. 20554
May 14, 2014
Released: May 14, 2014
100 E. Speer Boulevard
Denver, Colorado 80203
KWGN-TV, Denver, CO
Facility ID No. 35883
This letter refers to your license renewal application for KWGN-TV (the “Station”)1 and hereby
admonishes the Station for its failure to comply with the limits on commercial matter in children’s
In the Children's Television Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-437, 104 Stat. 996-1000, codified at 47
U.S.C. Sections 303a, 303b and 394, Congress directed the Commission to adopt rules, inter alia, limiting
the number of minutes of commercial matter that television stations may air during children's
programming, and to consider in its review of television license renewals the extent to which the licensee
has complied with such commercial limits. Pursuant to this statutory mandate, the Commission adopted
Section 73.670 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.670, which limits the amount of commercial matter which
may be aired during children's programming to 10.5 minutes per hour on weekends and 12 minutes per
hour on weekdays. The Commission also reaffirmed and clarified its long-standing policy against
“program-length commercials.” The Commission defined a “program-length commercial” as “a program
associated with a product, in which commercials for that product are aired,” and stated that the entire
duration of any program-length commercial would be counted as commercial matter for the purpose of
the children's television commercial limits.2 The commercial limitations became effective on January 1,
On November 27, 2013, you filed the above-referenced license renewal application for the
Station. In response to Section IV, Question 5 of that application, you attached an exhibit which admitted
to potential violations of our children’s commercial time limits.4 The exhibit first reported that, on
December 23, 2006, the Station aired a commercial (for Post Cereal’s Cocoa Pebbles) during the “Xiaolin
Showdown” program that contained glimpses of characters from the program on the screen. The exhibit
notes that the images appeared twice, each for two seconds in duration, and the display was no more than
a tenth of the overall screen display.
1 File No. BRCDT-20131202ATF.
2 Children’s Television Programming, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 2111, 2218, recon. granted in part, 6 FCC Rcd
5093, 5098 (1991).
3 Children’s Television Programming, 6 FCC Rcd 5529, 5530 (1991).
4 File No. BRCDT-20131202ATF, Exhibit 22.
Based on the information provided describing the commercial, it appears that this incident is an
example of “host-selling.” Host-selling involves program-related characters promoting any product
during the program in question and is a practice that the Commission has denounced because it takes
unfair advantage of the trust that children place in such characters.5 In this regard, the Commission has
stated that “host-selling encompasses any character endorsement - not just direct vocal appeals - that has
the effect of confusing a child viewer from distinguishing between program and non-program material.”6
For example, the Commission has determined that “advertisements featuring the same type of animation
that is regularly featured in the accompanying program constitutes host-selling.”7
Based on the
information before us, we believe the commercial broadcast on December 23, 2006, violated the
Commission's host-selling policy.
Your exhibit also reported that, on October 28, 2006, the Station aired the children’s program
“Scooby-Doo” and a failure of the video playback system resulted in a segment being skipped and a
commercial break inadvertently airing twice, resulting in a commercial overage of one minute. In
Children's Television Programming, the Commission specifically recognized that licensees may
experience occasional emergency scheduling changes” which would be taken into consideration in
determining whether “extenuating circumstances” mitigated any resulting children's television violations.8
The technical failure here constitutes an extenuating circumstance that means this overage shall be
considered de minimis.9
Although we consider any violation of our rules limiting the amount of commercial matter in
children’s programming to be significant, the violations described in your renewal application appear to
have been isolated occurrences. Although we do not rule out more severe sanctions for violations of this
nature in the future, we have determined that an admonition is appropriate at this time. Therefore, based
upon the facts and circumstances before us, we
ADMONISHyou for these violations of the children’s
television commercial limits rule and policies described in the Station’s renewal application. We remind
you that the Commission expects all commercial television licensees to comply with the limits on
commercial matter in children’s programming.
5 WVTV Licensee, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 25 FCC Rcd 3741, 3743 (Vid. Div. 2010).
6 WHYY, Inc., Admonishment Letter, 7 FCC Rcd 7123 (MMB 1992).
8 WTOC License Subsidiary, LLC, Letter Decision, 28 FCC Rcd 7231, 7232 (Vid. Div. 2013) (citing Children’s
Television Programming, Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 2111, 2126 n.123, recon. granted in part, 6 FCC Rcd 5093,
9 Id. (citing WFTV, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 6140, 6142 n.8 (2010).
IT IS ORDEREDthat, a copy of this Letter shall be sent by First Class and
Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to the licensee at the address listed above.
Barbara A. Kreisman
Chief, Video Division
435 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.