Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Michael H. Glass, WMER(AM), Meridian, MS

Attachments & Related Documents

Download Options

Released: February 6, 2014

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-151

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of

NAL/Account No: MB-201441410009
Michael H. Glass
FRN: 0003779345
Licensee of Station WMER(AM)
Facility I.D. No. 48542
Meridian, Mississippi
File No.: BR-20120208ADO


Adopted: February 6, 2014

Released: February 6, 2014
By the Chief, Media Bureau:
1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Media Bureau
(“Bureau”) of the Federal Communications Commission ( “Commission”) and Michael H. Glass
(“Licensee”), licensee of WMER(AM), Meridian, Mississippi ( “Station”). The Consent Decree resolves
issues arising from the Bureau’s review of the captioned license renewal application for the Station
2. In the Application, Licensee disclosed the existence of a Notice of Apparent Liability for
Forfeiture (“NAL”) and a Forfeiture Order issued by the Enforcement Bureau on March 6, 2008, and
June 2, 2008, respectively.1 In the NAL, the Enforcement Bureau found Licensee apparently liable for a
forfeiture of $16,000 for failing to have an operational Emergency Alert System as required by Section
11.35 of the Commission’s rules (“Rules”),2 failing to operate within authorized power limitations in
violation of Section 73.1745(a) of the Rules,3 and failing to have a license for the Station’s Studio to
Transmitter link in violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.4 After
Licensee demonstrated that the proposed forfeiture would pose a financial hardship, the Enforcement
Bureau reduced the forfeiture amount to $1,500.
3. During our review of the Application, we determined that Licensee had not remitted
payment of the monetary forfeiture as directed by the Forfeiture Order and that, after the Office of the
United States Attorneys declined to institute collection procedures based on the amount involved, the
Commission had cancelled the unpaid forfeiture. The Bureau and the Licensee have negotiated a
Consent Decree that provides that Licensee will institute and maintain, for three years, a Compliance
Plan for the Station and make a $1,500 voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury. A copy of
the Consent Decree is attached and incorporated by reference.

1 Michael H. Glass, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (EB Mar. 6, 2008); Michael H. Glass, Forfeiture
Order, 23 FCC Rcd 8495 (EB 2008)
2 47 C.F.R. § 11.35.
3 47 C.F.R. § 73.1745(a).
4 47 U.S.C. § 301.

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-151

4. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
that the public interest would be served by its approval and by terminating the Bureau’s investigation of
the Licensee’s violations of the Rules in connection with the Application. In addition, based on the
record before us, we conclude that there are no substantial or material questions of fact as to whether the
Licensee possesses the basic qualifications to hold a Commission license.5
5. Accordingly,


that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended,6 and Sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission’s Rules,7
the Consent Decree attached to this Order




that a copy of this Order and Consent Decree shall be sent
by both First Class mail and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Licensee, Michael H. Glass,
315 A Street, Meridian, Mississippi 39301, and Licensee’s counsel, John S. Neely, Esq., Miller and
Neely, P.C., 6900 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 704, Bethesda, MD 20815.
William T. Lake
Chief, Media Bureau

5 Section 309(k)(1) of the Act states that the Commission shall grant a license renewal application “if it finds, with
respect to that station, during the preceding term of its license—(a) the station has served the public interest,
convenience, and necessity; (b) there have been no serious violations by the licensee of the Act or Commission rules
and regulations; and (c) there have been no other violations by the licensee of the Act or Commission rules or
regulations which, taken together, would constitute a pattern of abuse.” 47 U.S.C. §309(k)(1). Section 309(k) of the
Act states, however, that if the licensee fails to meet this three part standard, the Commission may deny the
application—after notice and comment, and opportunity for hearing under Section 309(e) of the Act—“or grant the
application on terms and conditions as are appropriate….” 47 U.S.C. §§ 309(k)(2) and 309(k)(3).
6 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 503(b).
7 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.