Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

NUCOM LMDS Licenses Petition for Reconsideration Order

Download Options

Released: January 16, 2014

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-51

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In re Matter of


Petition for Reconsideration of Placement of
Local Multipoint Distribution Service Licenses
WPOH485, WPOH486, WPOH487, WPOH488,
and WPOH489 into Termination Pending Status


Adopted: January 15, 2014

Released: January 16, 2014
By the Deputy Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:



1. In this Order on Reconsideration, we deny a request filed by NUCOM seeking
reconsideration of our prior action placing NUCOM’s Local Multipoint Distribution Service (“LMDS”)
licenses WPOH485 (Oneonta, NY), WPOH486 (Portsmouth, OH), WPOH487 (New Castle, PA),
WPOH488 (Burlington, IA), and WPOH489 (Waycross, GA) (“Licenses”) into termination pending
status. We also note that the Licenses automatically terminated as of November 1, 2013.



On June 24, 1998, the Licenses were originally issued to NUCOM as a result of Auction
No. 17.1 At the end of the initial ten-year license period, by June 24, 2008, NUCOM was required to
submit an acceptable showing to the Commission demonstrating it was providing “substantial service” in
each licensed area.2 Failure by any licensee to meet the substantial service requirement will result in
forfeiture of the license and the licensee will be ineligible to regain it.3
On October 10, 2007, NUCOM filed applications for extension of time to demonstrate
substantial service for its LMDS licenses.4 On April 11, 2008, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

1 See File No. 0000000022 (granted June 24, 1998); FCC Announces the Conditional Grant of 25 Local Multipoint
Distribution Service Licenses, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17186 (WTB 1998).
2 See 47 C.F.R. § 101.1011(a); see also Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, and 25 of the Commission’s Rules to
Redesignate the 27.5 GHz Frequency Band, to Reallocate the 29.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Band, to Establish Rules
and Policies For Local Multipoint Distribution Service and For Fixed Satellite Services, CC Docket No. 92-297,
Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 12 FCC Rcd 12545,
12658 ¶¶ 261-262 (1997) (“LMDS Second Report and Order”).
3 See 47 C.F.R. § 101.1011(a).
4 File Nos. 0003195288-0003195292 (filed Oct. 10, 2007).

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-51

(“Bureau”) granted the requests for extension of the construction deadlines filed by a large group of
LMDS licensees – including NUCOM – to extend their deadlines to meet the substantial service
requirements to June 1, 2012, resulting in a nearly four-year construction extension for each of these
The Bureau found that these LMDS licensees faced factors beyond their control,
including difficulties in obtaining viable and affordable equipment, that warranted an extension.6 In
making this finding, the Bureau noted that the licensees seeking relief from the construction deadlines
represented a majority of LMDS licensees for whom buildout requirements were approaching, and that
they all faced these same basic obstacles to timely construction.7 Thus, these obstacles were not a product
of an individual licensee’s short-sightedness or its unfortunate business decisions; rather, the difficulties
in procuring the basic equipment necessary for LMDS operations were widespread, stemming from the
state of the market. Based on the record evidence, the Bureau anticipated that various developments in
the market – arising in large part from the rollout of new services that could provide opportunities for
LMDS operations – would help rectify these difficulties. Thus, the Bureau found that NUCOM and
others could potentially use their LMDS licenses to provide wireless backhaul services to licensees in the
700 MHz band, the Advanced Wireless Services-1 (“AWS-1”) band, and other bands suitable for mobile
broadband service, all of which at that time had recently been auctioned, licensed, or put into use.8 The
Bureau anticipated that these bands would develop robustly, along with other mobile and fixed wireless
services, and that resulting opportunities for associated LMDS service (such as wireless backhaul) would
help spur production of equipment designed for LMDS use and thus facilitate timely construction by
NUCOM and the other LMDS licensees, under the extended buildout deadline set by the Bureau.9
On April 2, 2012, NUCOM filed applications pursuant to Section 1.946(e) of the
Commission’s Rules seeking a further extension of time until June 7, 2013, to construct its five LMDS
licenses.10 On May 14, 2012, NUCOM amended the 2012 Extension Applications to provide a copy of an
equipment order.11 On May 23, 2012, NUCOM amended the 2012 Extension Applications to provide
additional legal argument in support of its request for more time.12 On August 7, 2013, NUCOM
amended the 2012 Extension Applications to request an extension until November 1, 2013.13 On August
15, 2013, the Bureau granted the 2012 Extension Applications, as amended, and extended the deadline for
NUCOM to demonstrate substantial service to November 1, 2013.14

5 Applications filed by Licensees in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) Seeking Waivers of Section
101.1011 of the Commission’s Rules and Extensions of Time to Construct and Demonstrate Substantial Service,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5894 (WTB 2008) (LMDS Order).
6 LMDS Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 5905 ¶ 24.
7 Id.
8 Id. at 5905 ¶ 25.
9 Id.
10 See File Nos. 0005145441-0005145445 (filed Apr. 2, 2012) (“2012 Extension Applications”).
11 2012 Extension Applications, NUCOM Equipment Order (filed May 14, 2012).
12 2012 Extension Applications, Supplement and Amendment to Request for Additional Time to Demonstrate
Substantial Service (filed May 23, 2012).
13 2012 Extension Applications, Amendment (filed Aug. 7, 2013).
14 2012 Extension Applications (granted Aug. 15, 2013).

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-51

NUCOM was required to file a notification of completion of construction for each of the
Licenses by November 16, 2013, or fifteen days after the November 1, 2013 deadline.15 If NUCOM had
wanted additional time to demonstrate substantial service, it was required to have filed a Form 601
seeking an extension by November 1, 2013, the construction deadline.16 NUCOM did not make any filing
with respect to the Licenses during this period.
7. When a licensee fails to file a notification that it has completed construction by an applicable
buildout deadline, the license, location, or frequency is placed in “termination pending” status. For a
license, location, or frequency in that status, the Bureau presumes that the licensee did not meet buildout
requirement.17 If the licensee does not file a petition for reconsideration within 30 days after public notice
of the termination pending status demonstrating that it met that buildout requirement, the status of the
license, location, or frequency is changed to “terminated” as of the buildout deadline.18 On December 11,
2013, the Bureau sent NUCOM license auto-termination letters and the Licenses entered termination
pending status.19 Accordingly, on the same day, the Bureau provided public notice of the pending license
On December 26, 2013, NUCOM filed a petition for reconsideration.21 NUCOM reports,
“NUCOM is in the process of completing its construction and coverage requirement and expect[s]
completion before end of 2013.”22



We must deny the Petition because NUCOM has not met the November 1, 2013
substantial service deadline and it has not explained why it failed to either meet the substantial service
deadline or timely request a further extension of the deadline. Once a license enters termination pending
status, a petition shall be granted only if the licensee demonstrates that it met the relevant construction
deadline.23 NUCOM admits that, as of the date it filed the Petition, it had not yet constructed facilities
under the Licenses.24 Furthermore, it has failed to properly request an extension of the substantial service
deadline, and it has not requested a waiver of the substantial service deadline.25 Without an extension or

15 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d).
16 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(e).
17 See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces Deployment Of “Auto-Term,” the Automated Feature in its
Universal Licensing System That Identifies Unconstructed Stations Resulting in Automatic Termination of Licenses,
Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 163 (WTB 2006) (“Auto-Term Public Notice”).
18 Id.
19 Auto-Termination Letters, Ref. Nos. 5704551-5704555 (Dec. 11, 2013).
20 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Market Based Licenses Termination Pending, Report No. 9205, Public
(Dec. 11, 2013) at 1.
21 Petition for Reconsideration (filed Dec. 26, 2013) (“Petition”).
22 Id.
23 See Auto-Term Public Notice.
24 See Petition.
25 Because NUCOM has not properly requested an extension of the substantial service deadline, we need not decide
whether we would have granted a timely request for extension. If a request for extension had been filed, we would
have required an explanation as to why NUCOM was unable to construct when it had placed an equipment order in
May 2012.

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-51

waiver, the Licenses automatically terminated, by operation of Sections 1.946(c) and 1.955(a)(2) of the
Commission’s Rules, on November 1, 2013.26



Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 405, and Section 1.106 of the Commission’s Rules, 47
C.F.R. § 1.106, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by NUCOM on December 26, 2013 IS
11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the
Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303(r), and Section 1.955(a)(2) of the
Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.955(a)(2), that the Universal Licensing System SHALL BE
UPDATED to reflect that NUCOM’s licenses for Stations WPOH485, WPOH486, WPOH487,
WPOH488, and WPOH489 automatically terminated as of November 1, 2013.
This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the
Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331.
John J. Schauble
Deputy Chief, Broadband Division
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

26 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.946(c) (providing that if a licensee in the Wireless Radio Services fails to commence service or
operations by the expiration of its construction period or to meet its coverage or substantial service obligations by
the expiration of its coverage period, its authorization terminates automatically, without specific Commission action,
on the date the construction or coverage period expires) and 1.955(a)(2) (cross-referencing Section 1.946(c) and
reiterating that authorizations in the Wireless Radio Services automatically terminate without specific Commission
action, if the licensee fails to meet applicable construction or coverage requirements).

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.