Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Pending Appellate Cases

Download Options

Released: August 12, 2014
image01-00.jpg792x612

Updated: August 5, 2014

LIST OF PENDING APPELLATE CASES

Name:

Ion Media Chicago License, Inc. v. FCC

Case No:

01-1457

Court:

District of Columbia Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In re: Paxson Chicago License, Inc. v. 21st Century TV Cable, Inc., et al., DA 01-149, 16 FCC Rcd 2185

and Paxson Chicago License, Inc. v. 21st Century TV Cable, Inc., et al., 16 FCC Rcd 15571 (2001). Not

docketed. FCC Order No. 01-226

Case Description:

Paxson challenges the FCC’s denial of its “must carry” complaints against thirteen Chicago cable operators

on the basis of a finding that no current FCC rules require mandatory carriage of both a broadcaster’s

digital and analog signal among other things.

Status:

Held in abeyance.

Name:

James A. Kay, Jr., et al. v. FCC

Case No:

06-1076

Court:

District of Columbia Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In re: improving public safety communications in the 800 MHz band, 22 FCC Rcd 10467 (2007) and

previous underlying orders, FCC Docket No. WT 02-55, et al. FCC Order No. 05-174, et al.

Case Description:

Petitioners challenge the FCC’s decisions restructuring the 800 MHz band to reduce radiofrequency

interference to public safety systems. Among other things, they claim that the decisions unfairly

discriminate between similarly situated parties.

Status:

Held in abeyance. Sprint motion to dismiss (Nos. 06-1076 & 06-1082) filed July 14, 2014. FCC motion to

dismiss (Nos. 06-1076, 07-1332 & 07-1367) filed July 14, 2014. Petitioner’s opposition filed July 24,

2014. Sprint Reply filed August 4, 2014. FCC Reply filed August 4, 2014.

image02-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Sprint Nextel Corporation v. FCC

Case No:

06-1278

Court:

District of Columbia Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In re: review of the spectrum sharing plan among non-geostationary satellite orbit mobile satellite service

systems in the 1.6/2.4 GHz bands, 19 FCC Rcd 13356 (2004), et al., FCC Docket No. WT 03-66, et al.

FCC Order No. 04-134 and 06-46.

Case Description:

Petitioner seeks review of the FCC’s orders in which the FCC adopted a plan for spectrum sharing among

operators in the 2495-2690 MHz bands.

Status:

Held in abeyance.

Name:

Tribune Company v. FCC

Case No:

07-1488

Court:

District of Columbia Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In re: shareholders of Tribune Co., and Sam Zell, et al. for consent to the transfer of control of the Tribune

Co. and applications for the renewal of license of KTLA(TV), Los Angeles, 22 FCC Rcd 21266 (2007).

FCC 07-211; MB Docket No. 07-119.

Case Description:

Appellants challenge the FCC’s denial of their request for a waiver in selected markets of the FCC’s

“newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule,” which prohibits common ownership of a daily newspaper and

a broadcast station in the same market.

Status:

Held in abeyance. Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Appellants Samuel Zell, et al. (No. 07-1489)

granted by court order April 30, 2014.

2

image03-00.jpg792x612

Name:

National Association of Broadcasters v. FCC & USA

Case No:

12-1225

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest

Obligations; Extension of the Filing Requirement for Children’s Television Programming Report (FCC

Form 398), FCC 12-44; MM Docket Nos. 00-44 and 00-168.

Case Description:

Petitioner challenges a Commission report and order that adopted FCC rules requiring that television

stations post public files on FCC hosted website.

Status:

Held in abeyance.

Name:

Blanca Telephone Company, et al. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

12-1365

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In The Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission’s Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible

Telephones - - Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission’s Rules, FCC 08-07 and 12-89;

WT Docket No. 01-309.

Case Description:

Petitioners seek review of the FCC’s denial of their requests for waiver of the September 18, 2006 deadline

to provide handsets that meet the FCC’s hearing aid compatibility standard for inductive coupling.

Status:

Petition for Review filed August 23, 2012. Initial brief filed March 1, 2013. Final brief filed April 5,

2013. Oral argument held September 20, 2013. Petition for Review denied by Opinion February 28, 2014.

Petition for Rehearing denied April 18, 2014. Mandate issued April 29, 2014. Petition for Cert. filed July

21, 2014. Government response due August 20, 2014.

3

image04-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

12-1482

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of Universal Service Contribution Methodology

Case Description:

Global Crossing challenges Universal Service Contribution Methodology, FCC 12-134, WC Docket No.

06-122 (rel. Nov. 5, 2012). In that Order, the FCC affirmed certain aspects of its universal service

contribution methodology – specifically, the contribution obligations of a wholesale carrier. The FCC also

provided guidance on the type and quality of evidence that the Universal Service Administrative Company

(“USAC”) should use in evaluating a wholesale carrier’s claim that it should not be held responsible for

making universal service contributions based on revenues from providing service to reseller customers.

Status:

Court order March 7, 2014 continued to hold case in abeyance and ordered parties to file motions to govern

further proceedings by September 2, 2014.

Name:

Illinois Public Telecommunications Association, et al. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

13-1059

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In re: Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the

Telecommunications Act of 1996, FCC 13-24, CC Docket No. 96-128 (rel: Feb. 27, 2013)

Case Description:

This case challenges the Commission’s decision not to preempt the decisions of several state regulatory

agencies that declined to order refunds of charges collected by LECs from payphone service providers.

Status:

Petition for Review filed March 8, 2013. Initial brief filed November 5, 2013. Final brief filed January 28,

2014. Oral argument held April 4, 2014. Petitions for Review denied in part and remainder of the

petitions were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction by Opinion June 13, 2014. Petition for Rehearing filed

July 28, 2014

4

image05-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Sorenson Communications Inc., et al. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

13-1122

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP) Captioned Telephone Service; Telecommunications Relay Services and

Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, FCC 13-13, GC Docket

Nos. 13-24 and 03-123 (rel. January 25, 2013)

Case Description:

Petitioners challenge a Commission report and order that adopted interim rules governing IP CTS (Internet

Protocol Captioned Telephone Service)

Status:

Petition for Review filed April 8, 2013. Initial brief filed February 5, 2014. Final brief filed March 13,

2014. Oral argument held May 13, 2014. Opinion of June 20, 2014 granted petitions for review; vacated

the entire Interim Order; vacated the $75 Rule and Default-Off Rule; and remanded for further

proceedings.

Name:

Sorenson Communications, Inc. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

13-1215

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program - - Telecommunications

Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, FCC

13-82; CG Docket Nos. 03-123 and 10-51.

Case Description:

Petitioner challenges a Commission report and order that adopted rules to reform VRS (Video Relay

Service).

Status:

Petition for Review filed July 11, 2013. Initial brief filed December 20, 2013. Final brief filed January 28,

2014. Oral argument held March 17, 2014.

5

image06-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Verizon and AT&T, Inc. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

13-1220

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Petition of USTelecom for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. 160(c) from Enforcement of

Certain Legacy Telecommunications Regulation, FCC 13-69; WC Docket No. 12-61.

Case Description:

Verizon and AT&T seek review of the FCC’s order denying in part a petition filed by US Telecomm

asking for forbearance from a number of rules, including the Part 32 Uniform System of Accounts for price

cap carriers.

Status:

Petition for Review filed July 15, 2013. Record filed August 30, 2013. Initial brief filed February 19,

2014. Final brief filed April 2, 2014. Oral argument scheduled for September 5, 2014.

Name:

Spectrum Five LLC, et al. v. FCC

Case No:

13-1231

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: EchoStar Satellite Operating Company – Application for Special Temporary Authority

Related to Moving the EchoStar 6 Satellite from the 77º W.L. Orbital Location to the 96.2º W.L. Orbital

Location, and to Operate at the 96.2º W.L. Orbital Location, FCC 13-93 (released July 9, 2013) and DA

13-593 (released April 1, 2013)

Case Description:

Spectrum Five challenges the FCC’s decision to grant EchoStar’s request for Special Temporary Authority

to relocate one of EchoStar’s satellites to another orbital location.

Status:

Notice of Appeal filed August 2, 2013. Order dated October 2, 2013 denied Appellant’s Motion for

Summary Reversal. FCC Final brief filed December 23, 2013. Oral argument held March 11, 2014.

Opinion July 11, 2014 dismissed both petition for review and notice of appeal for lack of standing.

6

image07-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Sky Television, LLC. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

13-1270

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2013; Procedures for

Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees; and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for

Fiscal Year 2008, FCC 13-110; MD Docket Nos. 08-65, 12-201 and 13-140.

Case Description:

Sky Television challenges the Commission’s decision to postpone, until fiscal year 2014, the effective date

of its combination of regulatory fees for same-market VHF and UHF digital television stations into a single

category, as set forth in Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2013, Procedures

for Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees, Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for

Fiscal Year 2008, 28 FCC Rcd 12351 (2013).

Status:

Petition for Review filed October 22, 2013. Record filed December 9, 2013. Initial brief filed March 31,

2014. Final brief filed May 5, 2014. Oral argument scheduled for October 16, 2014.

Name:

Securus Technologies, Inc., et al. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

13-1280

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services, FCC 13-113 (rel: September 26, 2013), WC

Docket No. 12-375

Case Description:

In the order on review, the Commission required that end user rates for payphone calls placed from

incarceration facilities, known as Inmate Calling Services, be based on the costs of providing service. As

an interim measure to bring rates closer to costs pending receipt of additional information on which to base

a permanent regime, the agency established a two-tiered rate cap pricing system that includes a “safe

harbor” rate and a higher hard cap that no carrier may exceed without a waiver.

Status:

Petition for Review filed November 14, 2013. Record filed December 30, 2013. Court order January 13,

2014 granted in part & denied in part petitioners’ motions for judicial stay. Initial brief filed July 21, 2014.

Final brief due October 6, 2014. Court order July 31, 2014 suspended briefing until further notice.

7

image08-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Mary V. Harris Foundation v. FCC

Case No:

13-1304

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Holy Family Communications, Inc. – For a New Noncommercial FM Station at

Lancaster, New York, FCC 13-41 (rel: April 2, 2013)

Case Description:

An appeal involving the grant of a construction permit for a new noncommercial educational FM broadcast

station in western NY. Appellant primarily argues that the Media Bureau was unreasonable in not granting

the Foundation a dispositive “fair distribution preference” where the station would be close to, but under,

the threshold set out in the rules for that preference.

Status:

Appeal filed December 13, 2013. Record filed January 30, 2014. Initial brief filed April 30, 2014. Final

brief filed June 19, 2014. Oral argument scheduled for October 27, 2014.

Name:

Alpine PCS, Inc. v. FCC

Case No:

13-5205

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

No FCC Order

Case Description:

Appeal from a June 3, 2013 district court order in which the court dismissed Alpine’s claims.

Status:

Appeal filed July 10, 2013. Government’s brief filed November 25, 2013. Court order April 1, 2014

ordered that the court will dispose of the appeal without oral argument. Unpublished Judgment April 25,

2014 affirmed district court’s order entered on June 3, 2013. Mandate issued June 19, 2014. Petition for

Cert. filed July 24, 2014. Government’s response due August 27, 2014.

8

image09-00.jpg792x612

Name:

David Alan Schum, et al. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

14-1026

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In re Applications of DFW Radio License, LLC and Bernard Dallas, LLC and Principle Broadcasting

Network Dallas, LLC for Assignment of the Authorizations of Stations KFCD(AM), Farmersville, Texas

and KHSE(AM), Wylie, Texas, FCC 14-3 (rel: January 22, 2014)

Case Description:

Schum contends that the Commission acted unlawfully in dismissing and otherwise denying his

applications for review of the Media Bureau’s consent to the assignment of two radio station licenses from

DFW Radio to Bernard Dallas, and then from Bernard Dallas to Principle Broadcasting. Schum asks the

Court to vacate or reverse the Commission’s Order and to return the licenses to DFW Radio, or

alternatively, require the FCC to investigate and conduct a hearing on the assignees’ qualifications to be a

Commission licensee.

Status:

Petition for Review filed February 21, 2014. Case No. 14-1027 consolidated with this case. Record filed

July 21, 2014.

Name:

FiberTower Spectrum Holdings, LLC v. FCC

Case No:

14-1039

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of FiberTower Spectrum Holdings LLC – Requests for Waiver, Extension of Time, or in the

alternative, Limited Waiver of Substantial Service Requirements, etc., FCC 14-18 (rel: February 27, 2014)

Case Description:

FiberTower, which holds several wireless licenses, challenges a Commission order affirming a Wireless

Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) decision holding that FiberTower failed to demonstrate compliance

with the “substantial service requirements” in the Commission’s rules, as well as WTB’s denial of an

extension of time to demonstrate substantial service.

Status:

Notice of Appeal filed March 28, 2014. Record filed May 19, 2014. Initial brief due October 14, 2014.

Final brief due November 18, 2014.

9

image10-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Signal Above, L.L.C. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

14-1069

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission’s Rules to Establish Rules for Digital

Low Power Television, Television Translator, and Television Booster Stations and to Amend Rules for

Digital Class A Television Stations, FCC 13-126, MM Dkt. No. 03-185 (rel: Sept. 27, 2013)

Case Description:

Signal Above seeks review of the FCC’s denial of its petition requesting reconsideration of the agency’s

earlier decision not to extend the Sept. 1, 2015 digital transition deadline for low power television stations.

Status:

Petition for Review filed May 5, 2014. Joint Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance granted by court order

June 10, 2014. FCC is directed to file status reports at 90-day intervals beginning September 8, 2014.

Name:

National Association of Broadcasters v. FCC & USA

Case No:

14-1072

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

Public Notice, DA 14-330 - - Processing Of Broadcast Television Applications Proposing Sharing

Arrangements And Contingent Interests (rel: March 12, 2014)

Case Description:

The National Association of Broadcasters seeks review of a Public Notice issued by the Media Bureau that

sets forth guidelines for the processing of applications for FCC approval of broadcast television

transactions involving sharing arrangements and contingent interests.

Status:

Petition for Review filed May 12, 2014. FCC’s Motion to Dismiss filed May 30, 2014. Petitioner’s

opposition to FCC’s Motion to Dismiss filed June 12, 2014. FCC’s Reply filed June 23, 2014.

10

image11-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Percy Squire v. FCC

Case No:

14-1077

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of Bernard Ohio (Assignor); Educational Media Foundation (Assignee) – Application for

Assignment of License for: WYLR(FM), Hubbard, Ohio; Applications for Renewal of Licenses for:

WVKO(AM), Columbus, Ohio; WVKO(FM), Johnstown, Ohio; WASN(AM), Youngstown, Ohio;

WYLR(FM), Hubbard, Ohio; and WGFT(AM), Campbell, Ohio, FCC 14-44 (rel: April 17, 2014)

Case Description:

Appeal of a Commission decision approving the assignment of four Ohio radio licenses by an entity

alleged to have violated 47 U.S.C. 310 by using foreign capital to finance its acquisition of the licenses.

Status:

Notice of Appeal filed May 14, 2014. Record filed July 7, 2014.

Name:

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

14-1088

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Related to Retransmission Consent, FCC 14-29

(rel: Mar. 31, 2014)

Case Description:

Petition for review of FCC order revising its rules to prohibit, as a violation of the statutory duty to

negotiate in good faith, joint retransmission consent negotiations with multi-channel video programming

distributors by television stations that are ranked among the top four stations by audience ratings in a

geographic market and are not commonly owned.

Status:

Petition for Review filed May 29, 2014. Record filed July 17, 2014.

11

image12-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Howard Stirk Holdings, LLC, et al. v. FCC & USA

Case No:

14-1090

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: 2010 and 2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of the Commission’s Broadcast

Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of

1996; Promoting Diversification of Ownership in the Broadcast Services; and Rules and Policies

Concerning Attribution of Joint Sales Agreements in Local Television Markets, FCC 14-28 (rel: April 15,

2104)

Case Description:

Petitioners challenge the FCC’s new rule under which certain joint sales agreements between TV stations

in the same market create an attributable interest for purposes of assessing compliance with the

Commission’s media ownership limits. Petitioners also challenge the agency’s decision to defer resolution

of certain issues concerning its media ownership rules until it updates the record in the Quadrennial

Review proceeding.

Status:

Petition for Review filed May 30, 2014. Case Nos. 14-1091, 14-1092 and 14-1113 consolidated with this

case. Motion to Transfer (to 3

rd

Cir.), pending. Stipulation Regarding the Record filed July 14, 2014.

Name:

Bob Law, et al. v. FCC

Case No:

14-1130

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of Urban Radio I, LLC, Debtor-in-Possession and YMF Media, New York Licensee LLC for

Consent to Assign Licenses (WBLS(FM) & WLIB(AM), New York, NY, FCC 14-83 (rel: June 10, 2014)

Case Description:

Appeal from FCC order that dismissed in part and denied in part an application for review of the grant of

assignments of licenses of radio stations WBLS(FM) and WLIB(AM) in New York, NY from Urban

Radio, I, LLC (Debtor in Possession) to YMF Media.

Status:

Notice of Appeal filed July 7, 2014. Procedural motions due August 8, 2014. Record/Dispositive motions

due August 25, 2014.

12

image13-00.jpg792x612

Name:

ADX Communications of Pensacola, et al. v. FCC

Case No:

14-1131

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of 6 Johnson Road Licenses, Assignor and Cumulus Licensing LLC, Assignee – Applications

for Assignment of Stations WMEZ(FM), Pensacola, Florida and WXBM(FM), Milton, Florida, etc., FCC

14-82 (rel: June 10, 2014)

Case Description:

ADX Communications appeals the Commission’s grant of applications for the assignment of several radio

licenses in the Mobile Alabama and Pensacola Florida Arbitron Metro areas to Cumulus Licensing LLC.

Status:

Notice of Appeal filed July 9, 2014. Procedural motions due August 11, 2014. Record/Dispositive

motions due August 25, 2014.

Name:

Warren C. Havens v. FCC

Case No:

14-1132

Court:

D.C. Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of Warren C. Havens – Applications to Provide Automated Maritime Telecommunications

System Stations at Various Locations in Texas, and Chaffee, Aspen, Colorado Springs, Copper Mountain,

and Leadville, Colorado, FCC 14-75 (rel: June 9, 2014)

Case Description:

Appeal from a Commission decision upholding a sanction imposed against Warren Havens for filing

frivolous and repetitive pleadings in a license application proceeding.

Status:

Notice of Appeal filed July 9, 2014. Procedural motions due August 13, 2014. Record/Dispositive

motions due August 28, 2014.

13

image14-00.jpg792x612

Name:

Albert A. Nigro v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC

Case No:

13-1362

Court:

Second Circuit

FCC Order Description:

None

Case Description:

Nigro sued a debt collector under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for making autodialed calls to

his cellular telephone without his consent. The Second Circuit asked the FCC for its views as to whether

Nigro, by providing his cellular telephone number to the electric power company in arranging for the

termination of service to the residence of his deceased mother-in-law, had consented to receive autodialed

calls seeking the collection of his deceased mother-in-law’s electric bill.

Status:

FCC as Amicus Party. FCC Letter Brief filed June 30, 2014. Mercantile response filed July 18, 2014.

Nigro reply filed July 21, 2014.

Name:

Dayton Access Television, Inc. v. FCC

Case No:

07-4467

Court:

Sixth Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In re: implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended

by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, 22 FCC Rcd 19633 (2007).

FCC Docket No. MB 05-311. FCC Order No. 07-190.

Case Description:

Petitioners challenge the FCC’s decision to extend a number of the rules adopted in the first Section 621

Order to applications for franchise renewals by incumbent cable operators.

Status:

Held in abeyance.

14

image15-00.jpg792x612

Name:

National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. FCC

Case No:

08-3369

Court:

Sixth Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Leased Commercial Access, R&O and Further NPR, 23 FCC Rcd 2909 (2008). FCC

Docket No. MB 07-42. FCC Order No. 07-208.

Case Description:

Petitioners challenge the FCC’s modification of its leased access rules, which require cable operators to

provide channel capacity for commercial use by unaffiliated programmers pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 532.

Status:

Held in abeyance.

Name:

Toshiaki Saito v. FCC & USA

Case No:

14-71611

Court:

Ninth Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of Pendleton C. Waugh, Charles M. Austin and Jay R. Bishop; Preferred Communication

Systems, Inc.; and Preferred Acquisitions, Inc., DA 14-492 (rel: April 11, 2014)

Case Description:

Toshiaki Saito seeks judicial review of an Order, issued on delegated authority by the FCC’s General

Counsel, which denied his petition to intervene in a license revocation proceeding involving Preferred

Communications, Inc. Mr. Saito, a creditor of one of Preferred’s former principals, would like the

Commission to revoke Preferred’s licenses, auction those licenses, and use a portion of the proceeds to

reimburse Mr. Saito.

Status:

Petition for Review filed June 10, 2014. FCC Motion to Dismiss filed July 3, 2014. Petitioner opposition

filed July 28, 2014. FCC reply due August 14, 2014.

15

image16-00.jpg792x612

Name:

In re: FCC 11-161

Case No:

11-9900

Court:

Tenth Circuit

FCC Order Description:

In the Matter of: Connect America Fund. WC 10-90, 07-135, 05-337 and 03-109; GN 09-51; CC 01-92

and 96-45; WT 10-208. FCC 11-161

Case Description:

Petitioners challenge various aspects of an order in which the FCC comprehensively reformed its universal

service and intercarrier compensation systems.

Status:

Petition for Review filed December 2, 2011. Thirty-One (31) additional petitions for review have been

consolidated with this lead case. FCC filed thirteen (13) responsive briefs in February - March 2013. FCC

Final briefs filed July 24 and July 29, 2013. Oral argument held November 19, 2013. All petitions for

review denied by Opinion May 23, 2013. Petitions for Rehearing filed July 7, 2014. FCC responses due

August 7, 2014.

16

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.