Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Reserved Allotment Group 47

Download Options

Released: January 7, 2014
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

January 7, 2014

DA 14-13

In Reply Refer To:
Released: January 7, 2014
Jeffrey D. Southmayd, Esq.
Southmayd & Miller
4 Ocean Ridge Blvd. South
Palm Coast, FL 32137
Michael Couzens, Esq.
6536 Telegraph Avenue
Suite B201
Oakland, CA 95609
In Re:

Reserved Allotment Group 47

New NCE (FM), Wynnewood, Oklahoma
Wynnewood Community Radio Association
Facility ID No. 184597
File No. BNPED-20100225ADV
New NCE(FM), Wynnewood, Oklahoma
Norman Unitarian Universalist Fellowship
Facility ID No. 185094
File No. BNPED-20100226AJA

Petition for Reconsideration

Dear Counsel:
The sole issue in this case is whether we correctly determined that Wynnewood Community
Radio Association (“WCRA”), an unincorporated applicant comprised of a single person, is ineligible to
construct a new noncommercial educational (“NCE”) FM station at Wynnewood, Oklahoma.1 For the
reasons discussed below, we uphold our dismissal of WCRA’s application. We also grant a construction

1 The Commission directed the Media Bureau (“Bureau”) to review WCRA’s qualifications after tentatively
selecting WCRA for grant in a point system analysis of six mutually exclusive applications. See Comparative
Consideration of 33 Groups of Mutually Exclusive Applications for Permits to Construct New or Modified
Noncommercial Educational FM Stations
, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 26 FCC Rcd 9058, 9074, 9099 (2011)
(“Comparative Order”). Subsequent to the Comparative Order, a second tentative selectee that had been tied with
WCRA withdrew and a non-selected applicant, Norman Unitarian Universalist Fellowship (“NUUF”), challenged
WCRA’s eligibility in a July 21, 2011 petition to deny. On September 21, 2012, the Bureau issued a Letter of
Inquiry requiring WCRA to provide additional information about its NCE eligibility. Jeffrey D. Southmayd, Esq.,
Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-ATS (Sept. 21, 2012). WCRA responded on October 18, 2012. By letter of January 14,
2013, we dismissed WCRA’s application. Jeffrey D. Southmayd, Esq., et. al, Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-ATS (Jan.
14, 2013) (“Dismissal Letter”). WCRA filed a Petition for Reconsideration (“Petition”) on February 15, 2013. Also
before us are NUUF’s Opposition of February 28, 2013, and WCRA’s Reply of March 14, 2013.

permit to the group’s sole remaining applicant, NUUF, which was tentatively selected for grant in the
same document that dismissed WCRA’s application.2


Section 73.503(a) of the Commission’s rules (the “Rules”) provides that “a
noncommercial educational FM broadcast station will be licensed only to a nonprofit educational
organization and upon showing that the station will be used for the advancement of an educational
program.”3 Individuals and sole proprietors are ineligible in the NCE service.4 In evaluating the bona
of an NCE applicant whose legal qualifications have been challenged, the Commission generally
defers to the requirements of the state where the applicant was formed.5 NUUF has argued that WCRA is
not a legal entity recognized in the State of Oklahoma, but rather the alter ego of one individual, Tony
Malaska (“Malaska”). WCRA, however, has maintained that it is an unincorporated association and that
the Commission has licensed such entities previously. WCRA submitted a statement by Malaska that
such forms of business are permitted under Oklahoma law but we did not credit Malaska’s opinion in the
Dismissal Letter because he had not established any qualifications on such matters.6 Moreover, we
observed that unincorporated associations generally consist of two or more people, whereas Malaska is
the sole officer and director of WCRA.7 We recognized that we have on occasion granted permits to
unincorporated NCE applicants but stated that those applicants, unlike WCRA, had demonstrated state
recognition of their organizational status either by registering with a Secretary of State’s office or by
submitting an opinion from a qualified attorney that the applicant is an unincorporated association under
state law.8


Reconsideration is appropriate if a petitioner demonstrates a material error or
omission in the underlying order or raises additional facts not known or not existing until after the
petitioner's last opportunity to present such matters. Reconsideration is not granted to debate matters
already decided.9 WCRA seeks reconsideration based on arguments that our decision was unsupported by
the record and misinterpreted Oklahoma law. In particular, WCRA contends that we erred by (1)
examining WCRA’s eligibility under Section 73.503(a) of the Rules instead of Section 397(6)(A) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), which explicitly mentions associations; (2)
breaking with general Commission policy of leaving interpretation of state law to the states; (3)
improperly faulting WCRA for not formally filing or registering with the State of Oklahoma when the

2 See Dismissal Letter at 5. We received no petition to deny the NUUF application.
3 47 C.F.R. § 73.503(a). An entity applying for a permit to construct a new NCE FM station must certify to its
eligibility as part of its application. See FCC Form 340, Section II, Question 2, and corresponding instructions.
4 47 C.F.R. § 73.503(a). In contrast, the Rules that apply to commercial broadcast service contain no such
requirement. The exclusion of individuals and sole proprietorships from NCE broadcasting, but not from
commercial broadcasting, is directly tied to major differences between these two services and the need for an
organizational structure that will support that distinction.
5 E.g., 47 C.F.R. § 73.503(a)(1) and (2) (eligibility determinations shall consider any accreditation by State
departments of education and regional accrediting authorities).
6 Dismissal Letter at 4.
7 Id. at 4, nn. 27 and 29. WCRA’s governing documents further specify that WCRA shall have no members. See
Articles of Association and Bylaws of WCRA, Article IV, Section 4.01.
8 Dismissal Letter at 4, citing Hammock Environmental and Educational Community Service, Letter, 25 FCC Rcd
12804, 12807 (MB 2010) (“Hammock Letter”) and M&M Community Development, Inc., Letter, 21 FCC Rcd 7983,
7984 (MB 2006) (“M&M Letter”).
9 See WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub. nom Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir.

State has no such process or requirement; and (4) disregarding Malaska’s statement that unincorporated
associations are legitimate in Oklahoma. WCRA also submits new evidence, an opinion letter from an
Oklahoma law firm, which concludes that Oklahoma law permits unincorporated associations and has no
requirement that they register with the State.10 In opposition, NUUF argues that neither the new evidence
nor any Oklahoma case cited therein addresses the question of whether an entity like WCRA, comprised
of one individual, can be recognized as an unincorporated association in Oklahoma.
As an initial matter, we confirm that the appropriate standard for considering eligibility for
licensure as an NCE FM station is Section 73.503(a) of the Rules. That provision, entitled “Licensing
requirements and service,” is contained within the rule part governing NCE FM broadcast stations. The
Commission has used that rule to determine NCE FM eligibility for almost 50 years. The alternative
advanced by WCRA, Section 397(6)(A) of the Act is also a longstanding provision, albeit newer than
Section 73.503(a). This provision is found within a portion of the Act named “Assistance for
Telecommunications Facilities; Telecommunications Demonstrations; Corporation for Public
Broadcasting,” which primarily governs non-Commission entities that provide financial grants to NCE
broadcasters.11 Section 397(6)(A) defines the term “noncommercial educational broadcast station” as one
which “under the rules and regulations of the Commission . . . is eligible to be licensed by the
Commission as a noncommercial educational radio or television station and which is owned by a public
agency or nonprofit private foundation, corporation, or association.” 12 In other words, an association can
potentially own an NCE station but only if it first meets Commission licensing requirements such as those
in Section 73.503(a). The Dismissal Letter correctly framed the issue here as whether WCRA adequately
supported its claim under Section 73.503(a) of the Rules that, as of the application filing date, it was an
organization eligible to hold an NCE license.
WCRA’s claim that we erred as to its ineligibility is based largely upon a new legal opinion,
which allegedly confirms and bolsters information that we previously rejected from WCRA’s principal
about Oklahoma law. This new evidence is inadmissible under the Rules and thus forms no basis for
reconsideration.13 Specifically, WCRA does not show that it could not have submitted the legal opinion

10 See Letter from Kent P. Sullivan, Esq., Leach and Sullivan to WCRA (Feb. 14, 2013) (submitted as Petition, Exh.
C). The letter provides citations to statutes and cases for the principles that unincorporated associations in
Oklahoma have the capacity to sue and be sued, receive service of process, and hold title to real property. E.g., OK
ST T. 12 §§ 182, 2017 B, and 2023.2; Oliver v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies, 941 P.2d 985 (1997);
Mozingo v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass’n, 575 P.2d 1379 (1978).
11 Because the Commission does not administer any grant programs and not all NCE broadcasters qualify for grants
administered by others, Section 397(6)(A) has historically been of limited relevance to the Commission. Mainly,
our reference to that provision began after Congress, in the late1990s, amended the Act to exempt applicants from
spectrum auctions when applying for stations that meet the Section 397(6)(A) definition. See Pub. L. No. 105-33,
Title III, 111 Stat. 251 (1997); See also 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(2)(C). While we have since, on occasion, cited Section
397(6)(A) in non-auction comparative cases, the outcome of such cases has been identical to the instant proceeding
concerning ineligibility of unincorporated applicants that did not exist in a form recognized under state law when the
application was filed. See, e.g., Six Applications for New Low Power FM Stations, Memorandum Opinion and
Order, 28 FCC Rcd 13390, 13393-94 (2013) (“Six Applications”).
12 47 U.S.C. § 396(6)(A) (emphasis added).
13 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(c).

previously.14 Nor does WCRA show that consideration of the legal opinion at the present time is required
in the public interest.15 Accordingly, we shall dismiss the Petition as procedurally defective.
Moreover, even had the new evidence been properly before us, we would have found no error in
our determination that WCRA is ineligible to hold an NCE license. When, as here, an NCE applicant’s
organizational status has been challenged before the Commission, and the applicant is not accredited by a
state department of education or recognized by another accrediting authority, the entity’s legal status
under state law is germane.16 The Commission has previously resolved some challenges in the favor of
unincorporated associations, but only if the applicant demonstrated that it took steps to obtain state
recognition17 or furnished the opinion of a qualified attorney that laws of the relevant state already
recognize the applicant’s status as an unincorporated association.18 Although this type of inquiry does
not take place in the context of commercial broadcast applications, the Dismissal Letter correctly applied
our Rules and precedent in the context of an NCE application.19
The legal opinion’s general conclusion that Oklahoma recognizes unincorporated associations is
silent on a specific issue central to this case -- whether Oklahoma recognizes entities like WCRA,
comprised of a single person, as associations. Black’s Law Dictionary defines “association” as “a
gathering of people for a common purpose; an unincorporated organization that is not a legal entity
separate from the persons who compose it.”20 Thus, the general legal understanding of an association is
an entity comprised of more than one person.21 WCRA has not shown that Oklahoma law accords a

14 WCRA merely claims that our Letter of Inquiry did not ask specifically for a lawyer’s statement but rather for “a
declaration by a person qualified to render an opinion on Oklahoma corporate law” and Malaska viewed himself as
so qualified. Petition at 3, 7. Malaska continues to claim that he is “fully qualified to give an opinion on Oklahoma
law” but again provides no information to support his bare assertion. Id. at 4.
15 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(c)(2).
16 See Hammock Letter, 25 FCC Rcd at 12807 (Commission inquiry about NCE applicant’s existence under state
law) citing Cosmopolitan Enterprises, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 47 FCC 2d 325, 326 (1974).
17 Hammock Letter, 25 FCC Rcd at 12807 (NCE applicant showed steps taken to be recognized by Florida Secretary
of State, including a stamped copy of its articles of incorporation and bylaws).
18 See M&M Letter, 21 FCC Rcd at 7984 (Applicant for a Low Power FM station in Ohio demonstrated that it was a
legally recognized unincorporated nonprofit association at the time of application by submitting a letter from an
attorney licensed in Ohio stating that Ohio law authorizes unincorporated associations and that the applicant met the
State’s definition).
19 See supra at n.4; see also Six Applications, 28 FCC Rcd at 13394 (non-compliance with state corporation law is
generally not a basis for denial of a commercial broadcast application if the matter has not been contested in state
court and the determination is more appropriately a matter for state resolution, but NCE applicants must demonstrate
their legal existence as an organization under pertinent state law at the time their applications are filed). In the NCE
context, operation of an unincorporated entity within an organizational format that is state-recognized provides a
system of accountability outside of the Commission for meeting shared not-for-profit goals, generally expressed in
publicly available documents or in association meetings, thereby preventing unilateral action for pecuniary gain.
20 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009) (emphasis added).
21 The Dismissal Letter correctly rejected WCRA’s reliance on the Revised Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit
Association Act (“RUUNAA”), a provision not adopted in Oklahoma, and showed that RUUNAA undercuts, rather
than supports, WCRA’s position because it specifies that an “unincorporated nonprofit association” consists of two
or more members. See Dismissal Letter at 4, n.27, citing RUUNAA Section 2(8), available at RUUNAA explains that while there
are other business models that can be formed by a single individual, at least two persons are required for an
association because that is the minimum necessary to have an agreement under general legal principles. RUUNAA
Section 2(8).

different meaning to this term and none of the Oklahoma cases that WCRA cites concerning associations
involved a single person.22 Since Malaska would not be eligible in the NCE service as an individual,
sole proprietorship, or similar form of business, it follows that Malaska, the individual, doing business as
WCRA is also not eligible. An individual doing business under an assumed name cannot side-step
Commission NCE eligibility requirements simply by choosing a name that contains the word
“association” or “organization.” Such a name choice supplies none of the safeguards, checks, and
balances provided by organizational structure and state law toward ensuring that non-profit entities adhere
to the noncommercial educational principles essential for NCE broadcasting.
WCRA’s citation to a case in which we licensed an unincorporated nonprofit organization in
Marlow, Oklahoma is misguided.23 That applicant, unlike WCRA, was not comprised of a single person.
Moreover, that organization’s eligibility to hold an NCE license had been resolved in another
Commission proceeding, where the organization demonstrated steps it had taken to register with the State
of Florida. As we observed in the Dismissal Letter, WCRA has not shown that it is recognized by any




. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by
Wynnewood Community Radio Association on February 15, 2013, IS DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the application filed by Norman Unitarian Universalist
Fellowship (File No. BNPED- 20100226AJA) is ACCEPTED FOR FILING for permit to construct a new
NCE FM station at Wynnewood, Oklahoma IS GRANTED CONDITIONED UPON its compliance with
Section 73.7002(c) of the Rules.25
Peter H. Doyle
Chief, Audio Division
Media Bureau

22 WCRA argues that although the relevant Oklahoma statute refers to “when two or more persons associate
themselves” for business purposes as an unincorporated association, that law does not require associations to have at
least two principals nor indicate that an unincorporated non-profit association cannot exist with a single principal.
Reply at 3 citing 12 O.S. § 182. The legal opinion of WCRA’s Oklahoma attorney is silent on this matter.
23 See Hammock Letter, 25 FCC Rcd at 12807.
24 Dismissal Letter at 5.
25 47 C.F.R. § 73.7002(c).

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.