Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Spectrum Task Force Requests Information On Frequency Bands Identified By NTIA As Potential Broadband Spectrum

Download Options

Released: March 8, 2011


Federal Communications Commission
445 12th St., S.W.

News Media Information 202 / 418-0500


Washington, D.C. 20554

TTY: 1-888-835-5322

DA 11-444

Released: March 8, 2011




ET Docket No. 10-123

Comment Date: April 22, 2011

By the Chiefs, Office of Engineering and Technology and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

By this Public Notice, we seek comment on the steps the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
can take to best promote wireless broadband deployment in the 1695-1710 MHz and 3550-3650 MHz
bands recently identified by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
for accommodating wireless broadband. We also seek input to inform ongoing assessment of several
additional bands NTIA has identified for potential deployment of wireless broadband. These bands
include the 1755-1850 MHz, 4200-4220 MHz and 4380-4400 MHz bands, and others identified by NTIA
as candidates for commercial use.
As background, the National Broadband Plan recommended that the FCC make 500 megahertz of
spectrum available for broadband use within the next 10 years, including 300 megahertz between
225 MHz and 3.7 GHz for mobile use in the next 5 years.1 In June 2010, President Obama issued a
memorandum that, inter alia, instructed the Secretary of Commerce, working through NTIA, to
collaborate with the FCC to make available over the next 10 years a total of 500 megahertz of Federal and
non-Federal spectrum, suitable for both mobile and fixed wireless broadband use.2
In October 2010, NTIA identified the 1695-1710 MHz and 1755-1780 MHz, 3550-3650 MHz, 4200-4220
MHz and 4380-4400 MHz bands in its "fast track" review for their suitability for commercial use, and in
addition identified approximately 2,000 megahertz of Federal and shared spectrum for further study.3

1 Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan, Recommendation 5.8, p.84 (FCC, 2010). The National
Broadband Plan is available at
2 Presidential Memorandum: Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution, dated June 28, 2010, which is
available at
revolution. See also Plan and Timetable to Make Available 500 Megahertz of Spectrum for Wireless Broadband,
U.S. Department of Commerce, Oct. 2010, (available at ("Ten-Year Plan").
3 An Assessment of the Near-Term Viability of Accommodating Wireless Broadband Systems in the 1675-1710
MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, 3500-3650 MHz, and 4200-4220 MHz, 4380-4400 MHz Bands, U.S. Department of

One month later, the Commerce Department, through NTIA, recommended the reallocation of the 1695-
1710 MHz and 3550-3650 MHz bands within the next 5 years,4 and in a January 2011 letter, NTIA asked
the FCC to "take the necessary regulatory actions to make available for wireless broadband 15 megahertz
at 1695-1710 MHz, and 100 megahertz at 3550-3650 MHz to be shared with currently allocated
services."5 On January 31, 2011, NTIA announced that it was conducting a detailed evaluation of the
1755-1850 MHz band to determine whether it can be repurposed for commercial broadband use.6
We seek specific comment on whether and to what extent these bands could be made available for
broadband deployment. We are particularly interested in comments on the following issues:
o How do the technical assumptions upon which NTIA based its analyses affect how broadband
services could be deployed in each band?
o How do the conditions placed on the bands (e.g., exclusion zones) affect their usefulness for
broadband deployment?
o What types of broadband technologies could be deployed in these bands and is equipment readily
available? Does this equipment meet the technical assumptions in NTIA's analyses? If not, how
would the use of different technologies affect the availability of each band for broadband use?
o Will future broadband services require paired spectrum bands and, if so, what are the most
suitable band pairings for the spectrum identified by NTIA? If the spectrum identified by NTIA
is not paired, what broadband technologies might be deployed?
o Could broadband services share use of each band with Federal users and what techniques would
be most effective for sharing (e.g., coordination in time, geography, or policy, and / or the use of
cognitive technologies)? If sharing would not be feasible, what process should be used to
relocate or phase out incumbent users (both Federal and non-Federal) and what are candidate
relocation frequency bands?
We discuss each frequency band in greater detail below.
1695-1710 MHz. The 1695-1710 MHz band is used for downlinks from certain weather satellites that are
administered by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for weather
forecasting, storm tracking, and hazard warnings.7 NTIA recommends that the FCC allocate the band to
the non-Federal mobile service and that we establish 72 to 121 km-radii exclusion zones to protect 18
Federal earth stations from harmful interference that may be caused by the new mobile service

Commerce, Oct. 2010, (available at
("Fast Track Report"). Also, the Ten-Year Plan lists of other Federal and shared bands identified for further study.
We note that the Ten-Year Plan also lists non-Federal bands identified by the FCC in the National Broadband Plan.
In general, opportunity for public input on these non-Federal bands exists in other ongoing proceedings, and
comments in this Public Notice on such bands are not solicited.
4 "U.S. Department of Commerce takes Major Step towards Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution," rel.
Nov. 15, 2010 (available at
5 Letter from Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, NTIA, to Chief, Office of Engineering and
Technology, FCC, dated Jan. 19, 2011, available at
6 "NTIA Takes Next Step in 500 MHz Wireless Broadband Initiative, NTIA," rel. Jan. 31, 2011 (available at The 1755-1780 MHz portion of this band
was previously identified in the Fast Track Report.
7 See Fast Track Report at pages 3-1 thru 3-25 and App. A ("Technical Characteristics for Federal Systems
Operating in the 1695-1710 MHz Band").
8 Id. at page 1-6, table 4-68, and App. H. The exclusion zones encompass areas in which approximately 12.65
percent of the U.S. population resides (based on 2000 U.S. Census data).

In June 2010, we sought comment on the potential for use of the larger 1675-1710 MHz band as part of
this docket. Accordingly, and based on the existing record we have developed, we ask commenters to
specifically address future broadband operations in the 1695-1710 MHz portion of the band that was
identified in NTIA's January 2011 letter.
3550-3650 MHz. This 100 megahertz spectrum block is part of the larger 3500-3650 MHz band, which is
allocated to the radiolocation and aeronautical radionavigation (ground-based) services on a primary basis
for Federal use and to the radiolocation service on a secondary basis for non-Federal use. The
3600-3650 MHz band is also allocated to the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) on a primary basis
for non-Federal use, limited to international inter-continental systems.
Under the NTIA proposal, non-Federal users would be prohibited from operating up to as much as 570
km from the U.S. coastline, and additional exclusion zones would be established for ten locations.9 NTIA
also recommends that the FCC require the use of radio frequency front-end filters with between 30 and 40
decibels of attenuation at 3500 MHz in order to protect the new mobile and base station receivers from
high power radar interference.10
The exclusion zones along the coasts were established due to potential interference from federal
ship-borne radars to commercial mobile systems and are based on known protection levels of the
broadband system receivers. We seek comment on whether the receiver protection levels used in the
analyses are appropriate for next generation broadband systems and whether potential commercial users
would be able to take steps to operate with smaller exclusion zones. Would commercial users be willing
to accept the increased interference risk that comes with smaller or no exclusion zones? How could this
increased interference risk be addressed in our rules? We seek specific comment on whether the error
detection and correction techniques employed in modern digital receivers can reduce the effects of pulsed
interference from radar signals. Would commercial users be willing to accept receiver standards to allow
better sharing with high powered adjacent band Federal systems? Additionally there will be periods when
the radars are not operating. We invite comment as to whether there are techniques that can be developed
to enable co-existence with the ship-borne radars, such as dynamic spectrum access to avoid use of this
spectrum when interference is present and instead move communications traffic to other spectrum.
We note that NTIA selected the 3550-3650 MHz band because Worldwide Interoperability for
Microwave Access (WiMAX) equipment has been developed for the band.11 We seek information on the
extent to which the technical considerations that apply to the adjacent 3650-3700 MHz band are
applicable here. For example, should primary fixed-satellite service use of the 3600-3650 MHz band be
restricted to currently licensed earth stations, and should such stations be protected on the same basis as
the "grandfathered" primary stations in the 3650-3700 MHz band?
1755-1850 MHz. This band is allocated to the fixed, mobile, and space operation (Earth-to-space)
services on a primary basis for Federal use, and is used by the Department of Defense (DOD), Federal
law enforcement agencies, and other agencies for a variety of satellite, surveillance, aeronautical
operations, fixed microwave and other operations. For example, some of the 20 channels that are used to
control Federal satellite systems are within the 1755-1780 MHz band segment.

9 See id. at pages 1-6 and 4-84, Table 4-66, Figures 5-2 and 5-3, and App. B. In developing the coastal exclusion
zone distance NTIA assumed that the shipborne radar was operating 10 km from the coast line. We note that this
differs from the 81 km distance specified for the adjacent 3650-3700 MHz band (see US349 (stating the distance in
nautical miles)).
10 Id. at page 4-78.
11 Id. at page 2-5.

In the Fast Track Report, NTIA stated that it selected the 1755-1780 MHz segment for its potential to be
paired with the 2155-2180 MHz band.12 However, given the number of Federal users in the band, the
diversity of Federal uses, and the need to find replacement spectrum for operations that would have to be
relocated from the band if it were to be made available for wireless broadband, a rigorous review of the
1755-1780 MHz band has not yet been completed. We note, however, that both NTIA and individual
Federal agencies have previously released reports, in 2000 and 2001, that address use of the 1755-1850
MHz band.13 These reports indicate that the satellite uplink operations could be in the band for
approximately another twenty years.14 They also indicate that co-channel sharing was not feasible due to
interference from the satellite Earth station uplink transmissions to mobile system receivers. We seek
comment on whether establishing exclusion zones around the satellite Earth stations to protect wireless
broadband receivers would result in the most efficient use of this spectrum recognizing that the receiver
protection levels for the commercial systems in the earlier reports, and the resulting exclusion zones may
no longer be applicable. Alternatively, we seek comment on whether broadband systems could operate
more efficiently on a co-channel, co-coverage basis with the Earth stations using time sharing techniques.
Commenters are strongly encouraged to provide supporting technical information for any geographic and
time sharing techniques that are, or soon-to-be commercially available that could be applied in this
spectrum to make it available for mobile broadband use.
4200-4220 and 4380-4400 MHz. These band segments are part of the 4200-4400 MHz band that is used
worldwide for radio altimeters on aircraft. In the Fast Track Report, NTIA decided to further review this
40 megahertz of spectrum to explore to what extent radio altimeters operate in these particular band
segments. We specifically invite comment on the extent to which radio altimeters are deployed and used
in commercial and private aircraft. What sources of information are available on the technical operating
characteristics of the radio altimeter transmitters and receivers (e.g., center frequency, bandwidth,
modulation)? Because the need for international regulatory action by the International
Telecommunication Union and the International Civil Aviation Organization means that this spectrum
cannot be made available for broadband use in the United States before 2016, NTIA also plans to work to
obtain international approval for reallocating this spectrum by that date.15
Additional Frequency Bands. We also seek comment on the Federal and shared-use bands identified as
part of NTIA's Ten-Year Plan. Which of these bands appear to be most viable candidates for commercial
broadband use and why? Is any of this spectrum well suited for the relocation of incumbent services in
order to open broadband opportunities in other bands? Are there bands or specific frequencies that would
be beneficial from an international harmonization perspective? What technical criteria should be used to
characterize the systems that might be deployed in these bands for purposes of analyses?

12 Id. at pages 2-3 to 2-5 and 3-25 to 3-29.
13 See, e.g., The Potential for Accommodating Third Generation Mobile Systems in the 1710-1850 MHz Band:
Federal Operations, Relocation Costs, and Operational Impacts, Final Report, March 2001, NTIA Special
Publication 01-46 (available at at page 3-12; Federal
Operations in the 1755-1850 MHz Band: The Potential for Accommodating Third Generation Mobile Systems,
Interim Report, dated November 15, 2000, NTIA Special Publication 01-41 (available at; and Department of Defense IMT-2000 Technical
Working Group's Investigation of the Technical Feasibility of Accommodating the International Mobile
Telecommunications (IMT) 2000 Within the 1755-1850 MHz Band, Interim Report, dated October 27, 2000
(available at
14 See, e.g., The Potential for Accommodating Third Generation Mobile Systems in the 1710-1850 MHz Band:
Federal Operations, Relocation Costs, and Operational Impacts, Final Report, March 2001, NTIA Special
Publication 01-46 at page xvi.
15 See Fast Track Report at pages 2-6 to 2-7.

Filing information. Comments are due by April 22, 2011. Interested parties may file comments
addressing these questions on or before this date. See 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 C.F.R. 0.241. All
comment filings should reference the subject public notice and

ET Docket No. 10-123

. Comments may
be filed by using (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal
Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).

Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the
ECFS: or the Federal eRulemaking Portal:

Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each
filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-
class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.

All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary
must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW, Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries
must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of
before entering the building.

Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority
Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.

U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to
445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities
(braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties
must also serve one copy with the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI),
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 488-5300, or via e-mail
Documents in the above docket will be available for public inspection and copying during
business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257,
Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from BCPI at (202) 488-5300 (voice),
(202) 488-5563 (facsimile), (202) 488-5562 (TTY), e-mail
For further information, contact Tom Mooring (202-418-2450; or Ronald Repasi
(202) 418-2470; (OET) and Peter Daronco (202-418-7235; or John Leibovitz (202-418-0690; (WTB).

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.