Click here for Adobe Acrobat version
Click here for Microsoft Word version

******************************************************** 
                      NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



                                   Before the

                       Federal Communications Commission

                             Washington, D.C. 20554


                                 )                               
                                                                 
                                 )                               
     In the Matter of                File No: EB-10-MA-0170      
                                 )                               
     Mikhail Rhodd                   NAL/Acct. No: 201132600004  
                                 )                               
     Lauderdale Lakes, Florida       FRN: 0020835724             
                                 )                               
                                                                 
                                 )                               


                  NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE

   Adopted: May 4, 2011 Released: May 5, 2011

   By the Resident Agent, Miami Office, South Central Region, Enforcement
   Bureau:

   I. INTRODUCTION

    1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that
       Mikhail Rhodd ("Mr. Rhodd"), apparently willfully and repeatedly
       violated section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
       ("Act"), by operating an unlicensed radio transmitter on the frequency
       89.5 MHz from his residence in Lauderdale Lakes, Florida. We conclude
       that Mr. Rhodd is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of
       ten  thousand dollars ($10,000).

   II. BACKGROUND

    2. On August 31, 2010, and again on October 6, 2010, agents from the
       Enforcement Bureau's Miami Office ("Miami Office"), in response to a
       complaint, used direction-finding techniques to locate the source of
       radio frequency transmissions on the frequency 89.5 MHz to Mr. Rhodd's
       residence in Lauderdale Lakes, Florida. The agents determined that the
       signals exceeded the limits for operation under Part 15 of the
       Commission's rules ("Rules), and therefore required a license. A
       review of Commission records showed no authorization issued to Mr.
       Rhodd for any operation of an FM broadcast station at or near this
       address. While monitoring the station on October 6, 2010, agents from
       the Miami Office heard a voice broadcast on the frequency 89.5 MHz who
       identified the station as "89.5 FM Stuntastic Radio." "Blakk Babi" is
       listed as one of 11 "members" on a website for 89.5 FM Stuntastic
       Radio. Mr. Rhodd identified himself as "Mikhail (Blakk Babi) Rhodd" on
       his personal webpage.

    3. On October 7, 2010, the Broward County Sheriff's Office ("BSO")
       executed a search warrant at the same residence, while Mr. Rhodd was
       present. BSO officers interviewed Mr. Rhodd regarding the unlicensed
       radio station and provided the Miami Office with a report of the
       interview. During the interview, Mr. Rhodd admitted that the residence
       belonged to his mother and that he resided there. He also explained
       that he arranged for the unlicensed radio station to be set up and to
       transmit from his mother's residence. Finally, he admitted that the
       station had been in operation for at least one month, and that he
       operated the station on at least two occasions.

   III. DISCUSSION

    4. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or
       repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions
       of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of
       the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued
       by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture
       penalty. The term "willful" as used in section 503(b) of the Act has
       been interpreted to mean simply that the acts or omissions are
       committed knowingly. The term "repeated" means the commission or
       omission of such act more than once or for more than one day.

    5. Section 301 of the Act states that no person shall use or operate any
       apparatus for the transmission of energy or communications or signals
       by radio within the United States except under and in accordance with
       the Act and with a license granted under the provisions of the Act. On
       August 31 and again on October 6, 2010, Mr. Rhodd operated an
       unlicensed radio station on the frequency 89.5 MHz from his residence
       in Lauderdale Lakes, Florida. A review of the Commission's records
       revealed that Mr. Rhodd did not have a license to operate a radio
       station. Because Mr. Rhodd consciously operated the radio station, we
       find the apparent violation was willful. Because the operation
       occurred on more than one day, we find the apparent violation was
       repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that on August 31
       and on October 6, 2010, Mr. Rhodd apparently willfully and repeatedly
       violated section 301 of the Act by operating radio transmission
       equipment without the required Commission authorization.

    6. Pursuant to the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and section
       1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for operation without an
       instrument of authorization is $10,000. In assessing the monetary
       forfeiture amount, we must also take into account the statutory
       factors set forth in section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, which include
       the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations, and
       with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history
       of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice
       may require. Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, section 1.80 of
       the Rules, and the statutory factors to the instant case, we conclude
       that Mr. Rhodd is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of
       $10,000.

   IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

    7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
       Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.204,
       0.311, 0.314, and 1.80 of the Rules, Mikhail Rhodd is hereby NOTIFIED
       of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of ten
       thousand dollars ($10,000) for violation of section 301 of the Act.

    8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.80 of the Rules,
       within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent
       Liability for Forfeiture, Mikhail Rhodd SHALL PAY the full amount of
       the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking
       reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.

    9. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by credit card, check, or
       similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications
       Commission. The payment must include the Account Number and FRN
       referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to
       Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO
       63197-9000. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank -
       Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St.
       Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number
       021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001. For
       payment by credit card, an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be
       submitted.  When completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account
       number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters
       "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Requests for full
       payment under an installment plan should be sent to:  Chief Financial
       Officer -- Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625,
       Washington, D.C.  20554.   For questions about payment, contact the
       Financial Operations Group Help Desk at 1-877-480-3201 or Email:
       ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov. Also, Mr. Rhodd shall send an email notification
       to  SCR-Response@fcc.gov  on the date said payment is made.

   10. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the
       proposed forfeiture, if any, must include a detailed factual statement
       supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to
       sections 1.80(f)(3) and 1.16 of the Rules. The written statement, if
       any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement
       Bureau, South Central Region, Miami Office, PO Box 520617, Miami, FL
       33152,and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.
       The written statement shall also be emailed to SCR-Response@fcc.gov.

   11. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in
       response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
       (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2)
       financial statements prepared according to generally accepted
       accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and
       objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's
       current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must
       specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the
       financial documentation submitted.

   12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability
       for Forfeiture shall be sent by both Certified Mail, Return Receipt
       Requested, and regular mail, to Mikhail Rhodd at his address of
       record.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

   Steven DeSena

   Resident Agent

   Miami Office

   South Central Region

   Enforcement Bureau

   47 U.S.C. S: 301.

   Part 15 of the Rules sets out the conditions and technical requirements
   under which certain radio transmission devices may be used without a
   license. In relevant part, section 15.239 of the Rules provides that
   non-licensed broadcasting in the 88-108 MHz band is permitted only if the
   field strength of the transmission does not exceed 250 mV/m at three
   meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.239.

   On November 1, 2010, Blakk Babi was listed as a member on the Facebook
   page for 89.5 FM Stuntastic Radio.
   www.facebook.com/pages/895-STUNTASTIC-RADIO/119200181427541. Although
   "member" was not defined, membership appears to involve DJing for the
   station, as three of the members had DeeJay, DJ or Joc in their names.

   On November 2, 2010, Blakk Babi's Official Music Page on Myspace,
   www.myspace.com/12streetsnapmusic, stated that "Mikhail (Blakk Babi) Rhodd
   was born..." The Myspace page also described Mr. Rhodd's rap music career.

   Mr. Rhodd alleged that the station's owners paid his mother a rental fee
   to place the equipment in her residence, but he would not identify the
   owners. Even if his alleged story is correct, we have previously held that
   liability for unlicensed operation may be assigned to any individual
   taking part in the operation of the unlicensed station, regardless of who
   else may be responsible for the operation, because Section 301 of the Act
   provides that "no person shall use or operate" radio transmission
   equipment. 7 U.S.C. S: 301; See Joni K. Craig, Forfeiture Order, 21 FCC
   Rcd 10793 (EB 2006); See also Jean L. Senatus, Forfeiture Order, 20 FCC
   Rcd 14418 (EB 2005).

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b).

   Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1), which applies to
   violations for which forfeitures are assessed under section 503(b) of the
   Act, provides that "[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the
   commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate
   commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate
   any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
   authorized by this Act...." See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting
   Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991), recon. denied, 7
   FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).

   Section 312(f)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(2), which also applies
   to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under section 503(b) of
   the Act, provides that "[t]he term `repeated', when used with reference to
   the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of
   such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous,
   for more than one day."

   47 U.S.C. S: 301.

   The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80
   of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order,
   12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), recon. denied, 15
   FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80.

   47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E).

   47 U.S.C. S:S: 301, 503(b); 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314,
   1.80.

   See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914.

   (...continued from previous page)

                                                              (continued....)

   Federal Communications Commission DA 11 -832

                                       2

   Federal Communications Commission DA 11 -832