Ascent Media Group, Inc.
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554In the Matter of
Universal Service Contribution Methodology
WC Docket No. 06-122
Petition for Reconsideration by Ascent Media
ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION
Adopted: May 3, 2013
Released: May 3, 2013By the Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau:
In this order, we grant a petition filed by Ascent Media Group, Inc. (Ascent Media).1
Ascent Media seeks reconsideration of certain aspects of the Achieve Order, in which the Wireline
Competition Bureau (Bureau) dismissed as moot requests from several petitioners to waive the filing
deadline for revising FCC Forms 499-Q, and denied separate requests to reverse decisions of the
Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) that imposed interest and penalties in connection
with unpaid invoices for universal service fund (USF or Fund) contribution assessments.2 As discussed
below, we grant Ascent Media’s request for waiver of the FCC Form 499-Q filing deadline and direct
USAC to accept Ascent Media’s revised August 2007 FCC Form 499-Q as if timely filed.3
1 Ascent Media Group Petition for Reconsideration, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Jan. 14, 2009) (Ascent Media
Petition). Petitions requesting reconsideration of action taken pursuant to delegated authority may be acted on by
the designated authority. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106. COMPTEL filed comments in support of the petition and Ascent
Media filed reply comments. See COMPTEL’s Comments in Support of the Petitions for Reconsideration of the
Wireline Competition Bureau’s Order Dismissing Requests for Review of USAC Decision, WC Docket No. 06-122
(filed Apr. 20, 2009); Ascent Media Group Reply in Support of Petition for Reconsideration, WC Docket No. 06-
122 (filed May 5, 2009).
2 Ascent Media Petition at 1-2; Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Requests for Waiver of Decisions of
the Universal Service Administrator by Achieve Telecom Network of Massachusetts, LLC et al., WC Docket No. 06-
122, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 17903 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2008) (Achieve Order). In April of each year, contributors
file the FCC Form 499-A to report their actual revenues from the previous year. USAC uses the FCC Form 499-A
data to conduct a true-up process, whereby USAC determines the actual amount owed by each contributor from the
previous year and issues either an invoice for underpayment or a credit for the overpayment. See infra para. 4. In
the Achieve Order, the Bureau dismissed as moot requests for waivers by several petitioners (including Ascent
Media) seeking to revise their FCC Form 499-Q filings after the 45-day revision deadline, because USAC’s annual-
true-up process, based on the petitioners’ FCC Forms 499-A, had already reconciled the contribution obligation for
such petitioners. Achieve Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17905, para. 5.
3 Ascent Media also requested a refund of interest and penalties resulting from its failure to pay its 2007 November
and December invoices. Because we waive the FCC Form 499-Q revision deadline and direct USAC to process the
form as if timely filed, the interest and penalties, if any, associated with these months will be reassessed based on the
Federal Communications Commission
In addressing the instant petition, we reiterate the importance of timely filing accurate
revenue information and paying resulting invoices. We also caution filers that our actions here do not in
any way diminish USAC’s “pay-and-dispute” policy,4 and we do not condone filers engaging in self-help
measures to dispute contribution assessments.
The Act and the Commission’s Rules3.
Section 254(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), directs that
“every telecommunications carrier that provides interstate telecommunications services shall contribute,
on an equitable and nondiscriminatory basis, to the specific, predictable, and sufficient mechanisms
established by the Commission to preserve and advance universal service.”5 Section 254(d) further
provides that “[a]ny other provider of interstate telecommunications may be required to contribute to the
preservation and advancement of universal service if the public interest so requires.”6 To this end, the
Commission has determined that common carriers and private carriage providers that provide interstate
telecommunications to others for a fee generally must contribute to the USF based on their interstate and
international end-user telecommunications revenues.7
In the Universal Service Second Order on Reconsideration, the Commission set forth the
specific methodology for contributors to use in computing their universal service contributions.8 The
Commission also designated USAC as administrator of the Fund, pursuant to which USAC performs
billing and collection functions for the Commission as part of its administration of the USF support
mechanisms.9 Under the Commission’s rules, contributors are required to file FCC Form 499-Q each
quarter, projecting their interstate and international revenues for the upcoming quarter and providing their
4 Pursuant to USAC’s “pay-and-dispute” policy, contributors are required to pay disputed invoices. In addition,
USAC imposes late payment fees on invoices that are not paid in full, and these fees will not be waived unless the
disputed charges are later found to be a result of an error by USAC. See USAC Website, Fund Administration,
Contributors, Bill and Dispute Procedure, at http://www.usac.org/cont/about/billing-disputes.aspx (last visited Apr.
22, 2013). The Commission has sought comment on whether to adopt a rule codifying USAC’s pay-and-dispute
policy or otherwise affirm the policy. Universal Service Contribution Methodology; A National Broadband Plan
For Our Future, WC Docket No. 06-122, GN Docket No. 09-51, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 27 FCC
Rcd 5357, 5482-84, paras. 360-66 (2012) (Contribution Methodology Reform and Modernization Further Notice).
5 47 U.S.C. § 254(d).
7 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 8776,
9183-84, para. 795 (1997) (subsequent history omitted). Although the Commission exercised its permissive
authority to assess private carriage providers, it exempted certain government entities, broadcasters, schools,
libraries, systems integrators, and self-providers from the contribution requirement. 47 C.F.R. § 54.706(d). The
Commission also requires certain other providers of interstate telecommunications to contribute to the Fund. See,
e.g., Universal Service Contribution Methodology et al., CC Docket No. 96-45 et al., Report and Order and Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, 21 FCC Rcd 7518, 7544, para. 52 (2006) (requiring interconnected voice over Internet
protocol (VoIP) providers to contribute to the Fund).
8 See Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Federal-State Joint
Board on Universal Service, CC Docket Nos. 97-21, 96-45, Report and Order and Second Order on
Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 18400 (1997).
9 Id. at 18423–24, para. 42; 47 C.F.R. § 54.702(b).
Federal Communications Commission
DA 13-966interstate and international revenues from the previous quarter.10 USAC computes the entities’ quarterly
universal service contribution obligation based on the projected revenue information reported on the FCC
Form 499-Q, and bills entities each month based on this obligation.11 Contributors have the opportunity
to correct their quarterly filings up to 45 days after the due date of each FCC Form 499-Q filing.12 In
April of each year, contributors file the FCC Form 499-A to report their actual revenues from the previous
year.13 USAC uses the FCC Form 499-A data to conduct a true-up process whereby USAC determines
the actual amount owed by each contributor from the previous year and issues either an invoice for
underpayment or a credit for the overpayment.14
In 2004, the Commission adopted rules implementing the requirements of the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA), which directs government agencies to “try to collect a
claim of the [U.S.] Government for money or property arising out of the activities of, or referred to, the
agency.”15 The Commission’s DCIA rules generally require that entities or individuals doing business
with the Commission pay their debts in a timely manner.16 In 2007, the Commission adopted rules to
strengthen oversight of the USF contributions process and align it with the DCIA.17 First, the
Commission restructured the rate of interest assessed against USF contributions debt that is more than 30
days delinquent, setting the interest rate for delinquent debt at U.S. prime rate plus 3.5 percent.18 The
Commission designed this interest rate to be consistent with commercial practices, and to address
shortcomings under the previous structure.19 Also, consistent with the Commission’s DCIA rules, the
10 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.706(a)-(b), 54.711; see also 2012 FCC Form 499-Q Telecommunications Reporting
Worksheet Instructions at 19.
11 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.709, 54.711(a).
12 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service et al., CC Docket Nos. 96-45 et al., Report and Order and Second
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952, 24972, para. 36 (2002) (2002 Contribution
Methodology Order); 2012 FCC Form 499-Q Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet Instructions at 9.
13 2002 Contribution Methodology Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 24973, para. 37.
14 Id. at 24972, para. 36. USAC will refund or collect from contributors any over-payments or under-payments. If
the combined quarterly projected revenues reported by a contributor are greater than those reported on its annual
FCC Form 499-A, then a refund will be provided to the contributor based on an average of the two lowest
contribution factors for the year. If the combined quarterly revenues reported by a contributor are less than those
reported on its FCC Form 499-A, then USAC will collect the difference from the contributor using an average of the
two highest contribution factors from that year. Id. In adopting the true-up process, the Commission created
incentives for carriers to accurately report their quarterly revenues by instructing USAC to base overpayment
refunds on an average of the lowest two contribution factors for the year, and collect underpayments based on an
average of the two highest contribution factors from that year. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service;
Petition for Reconsideration Filed by AT&T, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order and Order on
Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd 5748, 5752-53, para. 12 (2001).
15 See Amendment of Parts 0 and 1 of the Commission’s Rules, MD Docket No. 02-339, Report and Order, 19 FCC
Rcd 6540 (2004) (2004 DCIA Order); 47 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart O; 31 U.S.C. § 3711(a). Congress enacted the
DCIA to strengthen federal debt collection procedures. Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-
134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1358 (1996).
16 2004 DCIA Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6542, para. 5.
17 Comprehensive Review of the Universal Service Fund Management, Administration, and Oversight, WC Docket
No. 05-195, Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 16372, 16379, paras. 1, 14 (2007) (2007 Comprehensive Review Order).
18 Id. at 16379, para. 14. Prior to the 2007 Comprehensive Review Order, USAC had varied measures to reduce
contributor delinquency and pursue debtors with outstanding contribution obligations. In the 2007 Comprehensive
Review Order, the Commission adopted a single standard to be used in assessing late fees. Id. at 16378, para. 12.
19 Id. at 16376, para. 9.
Federal Communications Commission
DA 13-966Commission established that USF debt that is more than 90 days delinquent will incur an additional
penalty of six percent per year.20 Pursuant to section 54.713 of the Commission’s rules, contributors must
pay the amount billed by the due date provided in invoices to avoid the assessment of interest and
penalties provided under the DCIA requirements.21 If a contributor does not pay a disputed assessment,
USAC cannot waive the interest or penalties unless the disputed charges are later found to be a result of a
USAC error, or USAC is directed to do so by the Commission.22
Petition for Reconsideration6.
Ascent Media reported its total projected company revenue instead of its projected
interstate and international telecommunications revenue on its August 2007 FCC Form 499-Q.23 Ascent
Media states that it did not realize its error until it received its October 2007 invoice, which was the first
invoice based on this FCC Form 499-Q filing.24 The October 2007 invoice, at $717,000, was
approximately ten times the monthly amount Ascent Media would be required to pay had it not over-
reported its revenues.25 In accordance with USAC procedures, this invoice was the first of three identical
invoices for the fourth quarter 2007. Ascent Media states that the total amount invoiced in the fourth
quarter 2007 exceeded its projected gross telecommunications revenues for the quarter.26 Ascent Media
paid the October invoice in full and, on November 14, 2007, prior to receiving its November invoice,
filed an appeal with USAC, requesting that USAC accept its revised FCC Form 499-Q and recalculate its
contribution obligation.27 Ascent Media did not pay the November and December 2007 invoices, and
USAC imposed DCIA interest and penalties as a result. In January 2008, USAC denied Ascent Media’s
appeal, and Ascent Media sought review of that decision by the Commission in February 2008.28
In December 2008, the Bureau dismissed as moot Ascent Media’s request for waiver of the
deadline for revising the FCC Form 499-Q, and denied the company’s request for refund of interest and
penalties assessed for its failure to pay the November and December invoices.29 On January 14, 2009,
Ascent Media filed the instant petition for reconsideration asking the Bureau to reconsider and reverse the
decision dismissing Ascent Media’s request to waive the FCC Form 499-Q revision deadline, and reverse
20 Id. at 16381, para. 17.
21 47 C.F.R. § 54.713(a) (“A contributor that fails to file a Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet and
subsequently is billed by the Administrator shall pay the amount for which it is billed”), (b) (“If a universal service
fund contributor fails to make full payment on or before the date due of the monthly amount established by the
contributor’s applicable Form 499-A or Form 499-Q, or the monthly invoice provided by the Administrator, the
payment is delinquent. All such delinquent amounts shall incur from the date of delinquency, and until all charges
and costs are paid in full, interest . . . as well as administrative charges of collection and/or penalties . . .”).
22 47 C.F.R. § 54.702(c) (prohibiting the Administrator from making policy or interpreting Commission rules);
Contribution Methodology Reform and Modernization Further Notice, 27 FCC Rcd at 5482, para. 362.
23 Letter from Donna Cote, Ascent Media Group, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission, CC Docket No. 06-122, at 2 (dated Feb. 6, 2008) (Ascent Media Request for Review).
24 Ascent Media Petition at 2; see Ascent Media Request for Review at 8.
25 Ascent Media Petition at 2-3.
26 Id. at 2.
27 Id. at 3.
28 Ascent Media Request for Review. Ascent Media requested that the Commission refund interest and penalties
that accrued for the unpaid November and December invoices.
29 Achieve Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17906, para. 8.
Federal Communications Commission
DA 13-966USAC’s imposition of interest and penalties associated with Ascent Media’s failure to pay the November
and December 2007 invoices.30
We find in this limited circumstance that Ascent Media has demonstrated good cause to
waive the filing deadline for the revised August 2007 FCC Form 499-Q.31 We therefore grant the petition
for reconsideration and direct USAC to process the revised form as if timely filed.
The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown.32 A rule may
be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.33 In
addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective
implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.34 In sum, waiver is appropriate if special
circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public
interest than strict adherence to the general rule.35
We conclude that Ascent Media has, to the extent discussed below, met the high burden of
justifying that waiver is warranted here. Ascent Media asserts that it mistakenly reported its total
projected company revenues instead of its end-user interstate and international telecommunications
revenues on the FCC Form 499-Q at issue.36 Because of this error, Ascent Media’s invoices were
approximately 10 times its average monthly invoice.37 Nevertheless, Ascent Media paid its overstated
October 2007 invoice in full and on time.38 Ascent Media’s single payment for October 2007 was
significant and represented more than 75% of the company’s total USF obligation for all of 2007.
Moreover, Ascent Media promptly filed an appeal with USAC on the date the October invoice was due.39
Although the subsequent annual true-up process reconciled the amount paid by Ascent
Media with the amount it should have owed based on Ascent Media’s assessable revenue, the true-up
process did not adjust the interest or penalties associated with the nonpayment of the November and
December 2007 invoices, and these assessments remained on Ascent Media’s account. While we do not
condone Ascent Media’s non-payment of its November and December 2007 invoices, strict enforcement
of the filing deadline and the imposition of the associated interest and penalties in this case would
30 Ascent Media Petition at 13.
31 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Aventure
Communications Technology, LLC, Request for Review of USAC Rejection Letter and Request for Waiver of USAC
45 Day Revision Deadline, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 06-122, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10096, 10097-98,
paras. 4-5 (Aventure Order).
32 47 C.F.R. § 1.3.
33 Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular).
34 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff’d, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972); Northeast
Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166.
35 NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (stating that in addition to the public interest being
well-served, there must also be a sufficiently “unique situation” to grant waiver); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at
36 Ascent Media Request for Review at 2.
37 Ascent Media Petition at 2-3.
38 Id. at 3.
39 See id.
Federal Communications Commission
DA 13-966disproportionately penalize Ascent Media.40 By the time USAC performed the annual true-up for Ascent
Media’s 2007 revenue, the interest and penalties for these two months equaled the approximate amount of
Ascent Media’s adjusted assessment for those months. Further, Ascent Media has revised its internal
policies to ensure a filing error will not occur in the future.41 Given the magnitude of the interest and
penalties, the timely payment of the sizeable October 2007 invoice -- a payment that far exceeded Ascent
Media’s total adjusted contribution obligation for the fourth quarter of that year -- and the prompt filing of
the appeal with USAC, we find that good cause exists to waive the filing deadline for the revised August
2007 FCC Form 499-Q.42 We direct USAC to accept the revised August 2007 FCC Form 499-Q as if
timely filed, and process it accordingly.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-
4, 254, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, 405, and
pursuant to authority granted in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R.
§§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, the petition for reconsideration filed by Ascent Media Group, Inc. is hereby
GRANTED to the extent discussed herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission’s
rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Carol E. Mattey
Wireline Competition Bureau
40 See Aventure Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 10098, para. 6 (inadvertent reporting error of total company revenues rather
than end-user revenues subject to USF contributions caused undue hardship justifying waiver of FCC Form 499-Q
41 Ascent Media Petition at 9.
42 Absent a waiver of the 45-day filing revision window, Ascent Media would be required to pay not only interest
and penalties, but also a true-up differential. Under the true-up process, USAC refunds overpayment to contributors
at the average of the two lowest contribution factors for the year. 2002 Contribution Methodology Order, 17 FCC
Rcd at 24972, para. 36. Ascent Media’s overpayment occurred in the fourth quarter 2007 when the contribution
factor was 11 percent; however, under the true-up process, USAC refunded the amounts owed to Ascent Media
based on the average of the two lowest contribution factors for 2007, or 10.35%. Due to the magnitude of the refund
and the contribution factor differential, the true-up amount refunded to Ascent Media was significantly lower than
what it overpaid. By waiving the 45-day revision window and directing USAC to process the revision as if timely
filed, we avoid the true-up differential based on the two lowest contribution factors. Processing of the Form 499-Q
as timely also avoids application of the DCIA penalties and interest.
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.