FCC Releases Fourth "Measuring Broadband America" Report
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D. C. 20554
This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action.
See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974).
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:
June 18, 2014 Kim Hart, (202) 418-8191
FCC RELEASES FOURTH “MEASURING BROADBAND AMERICA” REPORT
NATIONWIDE TEST OF FIXED BROADBAND SERVICES REVEALS THAT WHILE MOST
ISPs MEET OR EXCEED SPEEDS THEY ADVERTISE, SOME BROADBAND PROVIDERS
SHOW SIGNIFICANT ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT
Washington, D.C. – The Federal Communications Commission today released the results of its ongoing
nationwide performance study of residential broadband service in its fourth “Measuring Broadband
America” report. The report continues the Commission’s efforts towards bringing greater clarity and
competition to the home broadband services marketplace. This year’s report reveals that most broadband
providers continue to improve service performance by delivering actual speeds that meet or exceed
advertised speeds during the past year, but some providers showed significant room for improvement,
particularly with respect to consistency of speeds.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said, “Consumers deserve to get what they pay for. While it’s encouraging
to see that in the past these reports have encouraged providers to improve their services, I’m concerned
that some providers are failing to deliver consistent speeds to consumers that are commensurate to their
advertised speeds. As a result, I’ve directed FCC staff to write to the underperforming companies to ask
why this happened and what they will do to solve this.”
This year’s report highlights five evolving trends:
1. ISPs continue to deliver the combined upload/download speeds they advertise, but a new metric
this year – consistency of speeds – shows there’s still work to be done: This year’s report shows that
average speeds are close to advertised, but not always available. Cablevision, for example, delivered 100
percent or better of advertised speed to 80 percent of our panelists 80 percent of the time during peak
periods, but about half the ISPs delivered about 90 percent or better of advertised speed, and several ISPs
delivered less than 60 percent or better of advertised speeds 80 percent of the time to 80 percent of the
panelists. This is the first time we have included a metric designed to convey how likely any given
consumer is to experience broadband speeds of a particular level or greater. We expect ISPs to improve
upon consistency over the course of the next year and we will focus on this issue in the future.
2. Download speeds performance varies by service tier, with some ISPs delivering less than 80
percent of advertised speeds: All ISPs except for one (Qwest, which had a 16 percent performance
improvement in download speed) were within 10 percent of last year’s results, i.e. largely unchanged.
Overall trends were encouraging. For download speeds, ten of 14 reporting ISPs showed slightly
improved download performance, four were virtually unchanged and only one ISP (Verizon offering DSL
service) showed results slightly worse than last year. However, Windstream’s 1.5 Mbps speed tier only
delivers 78 percent of advertised speeds, a low among all ISPs at all speed tiers.
3. Fiber and Cable technologies continue to evolve to higher speed offerings, but DSL is beginning
to lag behind: Additionally, while providers using cable and fiber access technologies generally met or
exceeded their advertised tiers, providers using DSL technology generally failed to meet their advertised
speeds. This may indicate differences in the economics of upgrading DSL relative to other technologies,
and investment choices by broadband providers or the price points at which higher speeds are made
available for DSL. For example, DSL can require structural or plant upgrades to achieve higher speeds
while cable or fiber can upgrade with incremental investments in the electronics. We fully expect
providers to make the necessary investments to ensure that the service they deliver is consistent with what
they advertise to consumers.
4. Consumers continue to migrate to higher speed tiers: We continue to see a migration of consumers
from lower speed tiers to higher offerings both by consumers electing to purchase higher speeds and
through upgrades of standard offerings by Internet service providers. A simple average of service tiers
surveyed in 2013 shows an average advertised speed of 21.2 Mbps, representing an increase of
approximately 36 percent from 15.6 Mbps in 2012.
5. Upload speeds vary sharply: Many studies have shown that consumer Internet traffic today is
asymmetric – consumers typically download far more data than they upload. Consistent with that
behavior, most service offerings typically have far higher download than upload rates. With this in mind,
we note that one ISP (Verizon) offers upload rates as high as 35 Mbps and one (Frontier) offers upload
rates of 25 Mbps, more than twice that of the next ISP. Verizon and Frontier use fiber based services and
have offered these high upload speeds during the course of our program. With the exception of these two
service providers, no other provider in the study offers rates that are higher than 10 Mbps.
The study uncovered network congestion at certain interconnection points during the report’s reporting
period. Although that data is not included in the findings of the report, the FCC will make this data fully
available with the report for the public to review and analyze. The FCC is also taking steps to better
understand the issues that presented themselves, including by analyzing network impact on video service
providers such as YouTube, Hulu, and Netflix and others and requesting more information from ISPs and
video providers about peering issues. We are working to develop tools that measure and validate how
these types of congestion issues affect the consumer experience. We expect to have instituted additional
testing methodologies providing more information on network congestion and peering by winter 2014.
About the Measuring Broadband America Report
The FCC released the first Measuring Broadband America Report in August 2011. That report covered
data collected in March 2011 and found that most broadband providers who participated in the study were
providing over 80 percent of advertised speeds during peak usage periods. The FCC’s second report,
released July 2012, included data collected from participating broadband providers in April 2012, and
found that ISPs on average delivered 96 percent of advertised download speed during peak usage period.
The FCC’s third report included results on satellite technology for the first time based on test results from
ViaSat, a major satellite services provider, and showed significant improvements had been made to
satellite broadband technology service quality.
The FCC began measuring broadband performance in response to recommendations in the National
Broadband Plan. Since then, by continuing to shine a spotlight on actual versus advertised speeds, the
FCC is ensuring accountability, increasing transparency and enhancing competition in the marketplace.
The report is part of a comprehensive series of initiatives that draw upon cooperation between the
Commission, industry, and other stakeholders to promote transparency and ensure that consumers get the
information they need to make informed marketplace decisions.
To read the complete 2014 Measuring Broadband America report, visit
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.