Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document


Download Options

Released: December 31, 1969
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

DA 09-761

April 02, 2009
Mr. Donald M. Jansky
Jansky-Barmat Telecommunications, Inc.
1120 19th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036-3614
Re: HISPAMAR SATLITES, S.A., Petition for Declaratory Ruling to add the
AMAZONAS-2 Satellite at 61 W.L. to the Commission's Permitted Space
Station List, IBFS File No. SAT-PPL-20081203-00219 (Call Sign: S2779)
Dear Mr. Jansky:
On December 3, 2008, HISPAMAR SATLITES, S.A. (HISPAMAR) filed the above-captioned
Petition for Declaratory Ruling to add the AMAZONAS-2 satellite, licensed by Brazil, to the Commission's
Permitted Space Station List.1 For reasons discussed below, we dismiss the petition as defective, without
prejudice to refiling.
Section 25.112 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25.112, requires the Commission to return, as
unacceptable for filing, any space station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal
inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission's rules. Section 25.137(b) of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25.137(b), requires entities filing a Petition for Declaratory Ruling to serve
the United States from a non-U.S. licensed space station to provide technical information for the space
station in accordance with Part 25. HISPAMAR's petition does not provide certain information required by
Section 25.114(d) of the Commission's rules, which renders the petition unacceptable for filing and subject
to dismissal. The deficiencies are as follows:
HISPAMAR's petition does not provide link budgets for the AMAZONAS-2 satellite, as required by
Sections 25.114(d)(4) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25.114(d)(4). This information is required to
assess the effects of each contributing noise and interference source.
In addition, HISPAMAR's petition is missing technical information concerning the orbital debris
mitigation plans for the AMAZONAS-2 satellite, which is required by Section 25.114(d)(14) of the
Commission's rules. 2 Specifically, HISPAMAR's petition is missing the following information regarding
orbital debris mitigation:

The statement required by Section 25.114(d)(14)(i) that the operator has assessed and limited the
amount of debris released in a planned manner during normal operations, and that it has assessed

1 The Commission's Permitted Space Station List comprises all satellites with which United States earth stations, with
"routinely" authorized technical parameters and operating in the conventional C- or Ku-bands, are permitted to
communicate, without additional Commission action.
2 See 47 C.F.R. 25.114(d)(14). The Commission requires entities that request a ruling for access to a non-U.S.-
licensed space station to serve the U.S. market to submit the same information concerning the orbital debris mitigation
plans of the non-U.S.-licensed space station as that submitted by U.S.-licensed space stations. See Mitigation of Orbital
Debris, Second Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 11567 (para. 92) (2004).

Federal Communications Commission DA 09-761

and limited the probability of the space station becoming debris by collisions with small debris
or meteoroids that could cause loss of control and prevent post-mission disposal.

The assessment required by Section 25.114(d)(14)(ii) that the space station operator has assessed
and limited the probability of accidental explosions during and after the completion of mission
operations, including a demonstration that addresses whether stored energy will be removed at
the spacecraft's end of life, by depleting residual fuel and leaving all fuel valves open, venting
any pressurized system, leaving all batteries in a permanent discharge state, and removing any
remaining source stored energy, or through other equivalent procedures specifically disclosed in
the application.

The assessment required by Section 25.114(d)(14)(iii) whether there are any known satellites
located at, or reasonably expected to be located at, the requested geostationary orbital location,
or assigned in the vicinity of that location, such that the station keeping volumes of the
respective satellites might overlap. If so, the statement must include the identities of those
parties and the measures that will be taken to prevent collisions.

The statement required by Section 25.114(d)(14)(iv) detailing the post-mission plans for the
space station at end of life, including the quantity of fuel if any- that will be reserved for post-
mission disposal maneuvers. The statement must disclose the altitude selected for a post-mission
disposal orbit and the calculations that are used in deriving the disposal orbit.
When re-filing, HISPAMAR may wish to consult the Public Notice released by the International
Bureau regarding information that is to be supplied in connection with the Commission's orbital debris
mitigation rules. See Public Notice, Disclosure of Orbital Debris Mitigation Plans, Including Amendment of
Pending Applications, 20 FCC Rcd 16278, DA 05-2698 (Int'l Bur. Sat. Div. rel. Oct. 13, 2005).
Although not a ground for dismissal, we also request HISPAMAR to clarify, in any re-filing, the
status of AMAZONAS-1. AMAZONAS-1 is a Ku-band satellite that is currently located at the 61 W.L.
orbital location. This is the same location at which HISPAMAR intends to operate AMAZONAS-2.3 In
particular, we request HISPAMAR to clarify any plans to de-orbit AMAZONAS-1 or to co-locate it with
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25.112(a)(1),
and Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. 0.261, we dismiss the
petition of HISPAMAR SATLITES, S.A. without prejudice to refiling.
Robert G. Nelson
Chief, Satellite Division
International Bureau

3 See Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Add the AMAZONAS-2 Satellite at 1.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.