Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Bruno Goodworth Network, Inc.

Download Options

Released: July 18, 2013

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-1585

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of:

Facility ID No. 68407
Bruno Goodworth Network, Inc.
NAL/Acct. No. 201341420014
Licensee of Station WJPW-CD
FRN: 0003783552
Weirton, West Virginia


Adopted: July 17, 2013

Released: July 18, 2013

By the Deputy Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau:


In this Forfeiture Order, issued pursuant to Sections 0.61(f)(1) and 1.80(a)(1) and (2)
of the Commission's rules,1 we find that Bruno Goodworth Network, Inc., licensee of Station
WJPW-CD, Weirton, West Virginia, repeatedly violated Section 73.3526(e)(11)(iii) of the
Commission's Rules by failing to make the required electronic filings of the Station's Children's
Television Programming Reports (FCC Form 398) with the Commission in a timely manner.
Based on our review of the facts and circumstances, we conclude the Licensee is liable for a
forfeiture of Nine Thousand Dollars ($9,000.00).


The Video Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability ("NAL") for Forfeiture in
the amount of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000) on May 21, 2013.2 The NAL notified the
Licensee that the failure to file the reports electronically constituted an apparent willful or repeated
violation of Section 73.3526(e)(11)(iii) of the Commission's rules.3
The Video Division received the Licensee's response on June 20, 2013. In that
response, the Licensee admits the violations identified in the NAL but nonetheless seeks a
reduction or cancellation of the forfeiture based on the circumstances surrounding the late filings
and the financial burden of the forfeiture on the Licensee.4


As we set forth in greater detail below, we conclude that the Licensee is liable for a
forfeiture for repeated violations of Section 73.3526(e)(11)(iii) of the Commission's rules. We
ultimately conclude, however, that the forfeiture amount should be reduced to $9,000.00.
The Commission is authorized to license radio and television broadcast stations and

1 47 C.F.R. 0.61(f)(1), 1.80(a)(1) & (2).
2 Bruno Goodworth Network, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, DA 13-1164 (May 21, 2013).
3 47 C.F.R. 73.3526(e)(11)(iii).
4 Licensee Response to Notice of Apparent Liability ("Licensee Response") at 1-2.

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-1585__

is responsible for enforcing the Commission's rules and applicable statutory provisions
concerning the operation of those stations. Under section 503(b)(1) of the Act, any person who is
determined by the Commission to have willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with any
provision of the Act or any rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission shall be liable to
the United States for a forfeiture penalty.5
In order to impose a forfeiture penalty, the
Commission must issue a notice of apparent liability, the notice must be received, and the person
against whom the notice has been issued must have an opportunity to show, in writing, why no
such penalty should be imposed.6 The Commission will then issue a forfeiture order if it finds by
a preponderance of the evidence that the person has violated the Act or a Commission rule.7
The Community Broadcasters Protection Act requires that Class A television stations
comply with all rules applicable to full-power television stations except for those rules that could
not apply for technical or other reasons.8 The Commission rules establish that Class A licensees
must (i) offer informational and educational children's programming; (ii) prepare and place in a
public inspection file quarterly Children's Television Programming Reports; and (iii) electronically
file those reports with the Commission.9
Commission policy establishes a base forfeiture amount of $3,000 for failure to file a
required form.10 In determining the appropriate forfeiture amount, the Commission may adjust the
base amount upward or downward by considering the factors in Section 503(b)(2)(E), which
include "the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation and, with respect to the
violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other
matters as justice may require."
The Licensee admits it failed to file electronically its Children's Television
Programming Reports with the Commission in a timely manner for 21 quarters during the license
period. These deficiencies, regardless of the cause, constitute repeated violations of the relevant
Commission rules. Nonetheless, the Licensee argues the forfeiture amount should be reduced or
The Licensee first argues that the forfeiture amount should be reduced or cancelled
because its failure to file the required reports in a timely manner was based on funding and staff
limitations.11 The Commission has long held that inadvertence or human error is not a mitigating

5 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(1) (A) & (B); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(a)(1) & (2). The Commission may assess a forfeiture
order for violations that are merely repeated, and not willful. See, e.g., Callais Cablevision, Inc., Grand Isle,
, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 1359, 1362 (2001) (issuing a Notice of
Apparent Liability for a cable television operator's repeated violations of the Commission's signal leakage
rules). "Repeated" means that the act was committed or omitted more than once. Southern California
Broadcasting Co.,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 (1991).
6 47 U.S.C. 503(b); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(f).
7 See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7591, 4 (2002).
8 Community Broadcasters Protection Act of 1999, Pub. L. No. 106-113, 113 Stat. Appendix I at pp. 1501A-
594-1501A-598(1999), codified at 47 U.S.C. 336(f).
9 Establishment of a Class A Television Service, MM Docket No. 00-10, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 6355,
6366 (2000); 47 C.F.R. 73.3526 (a)(2) & (e)(11)(iii).
10 See Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80(b) of the Rules to Incorporate the
Forfeiture Guidelines,
Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17113-15 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd
303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(4).
11 Licensee Response at 1-3.

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-1585__

circumstance that would make the Licensee less culpable and therefore subject to a lesser
forfeiture amount.12
We have considered the Licensee's arguments and conclude that no
reduction in the forfeiture amount is appropriate on this basis.
Licensee next argues that it does not have sufficient funds to pay the forfeiture
without cuts in operations.13 The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture
in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the respondent submits: (1) federal tax returns for
the most recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally
accepted accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation
that accurately reflects the respondent's current financial status.14
In general, a licensee's gross revenues are the best indicator of its ability to pay a
forfeiture.15 The Commission has found that the staff's use of gross revenues is a reasonable and
useful yardstick to analyze a company's financial condition for forfeiture purposes.16 Licensee
submitted tax returns for the years 2010 and 2011 and a profit-loss statement for 2012 because its
tax return for the year has not yet been submitted.
In the NAL, the Video Division proposed a forfeiture amount of $12,000. The
Commission exercises its discretion here to reduce the proposed forfeiture amount from $12,000.00
to $9,000. We reduce the forfeiture because the Licensee has demonstrated through the submission
of financial documentation that the proposed forfeiture amount would cause financial hardship to
the station.17 The tax documentation submitted by Licensee, as required under our Rules when
seeking a reduction, shows that the Station has averaged approximately $130,000 in gross revenue
for the three most recent years preceding the issuance of the NAL. We therefore conclude that a
small reduction in the forfeiture amount is appropriate.18


ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to section 503(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61(f)(1) and 1.80(a)(1)&(2) of the
Commission's rules,19 Bruno Goodworth Network, Inc. SHALL FORFEIT to the United States
the sum of Nine Thousand Dollars ($9,000) for repeatedly violating Section 47 U.S.C.
336(f)(2)(A)(ii) and 47 C.F.R. 73.3526(e)(11)(iii).

12 See Sage Broadcasting Corp., Letter Decision, 25 FCC Rcd 4556, 4558 (Vid. Div. 2010); Standard
Communications Corp.
, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1 FCC Rcd 358 (1986) (stating that "employee
acts or omissions, such as clerical errors in failing to file required forms, do not excuse violations"); Five Star
Parking d/b/a Five Star Taxi Dispatch
, Forfeiture Order, 23 FCC Rcd 2649 (EB 2008) (declining to reduce or
cancel forfeiture for late-filed renewal based on licensee's administrative error).
13 Licensee Response at 3.
14 Discussion Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd. 7433, 7411 (2004).
15 Agape Church, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 25 FCC Rcd 3732, 3734 (Vid. Div. 2010); PJB Communications of
Virginia, Inc.
, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 2088, 2089 (1992).
16 Id.
17 Licensee Response at 2-3.
18 Hoosier Broadcasting Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 8640, 8641 (EB 2002)
(forfeiture not deemed excessive where it represented approximately 7.6 percent of violator's gross revenues).
19 47 U.S.C. 503(b); 47 C.F.R. 0.61(f)(1) & 1.80(a)(1)&(2).

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-1585__

In the event that the Licensee wishes to revert WJPW-CD to low power television
status, the Licensee need only notify us of this election and request a change in status for the
station.20 Should the Licensee elect to revert the station to low power status, the Licensee would
no longer be liable for the forfeiture amount described herein.
Payment of the forfeiture shall be made in the manner provided for in Section 1.80
(h) of the Commission's rules within fifteen (15) calendar days after the release date of this
Forfeiture Order. If the forfeiture is not paid within the period specified, the case may be referred
to the U.S. Department of Justice for enforcement of the forfeiture pursuant to Section 504(a) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The Licensee shall send electronic notification of
the payment to Peter Saharko at on the date payment is made.
The payment must be made by check or similar instrument, wire transfer, or credit
card, and must include the NAL/Account number and FRN referenced above. Regardless of the
form of payment, a completed FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted. When
completing FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID)
and enter the "FORF" in block number 24A (payment type code). Payment by check or money
order must be made payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. Such
payments (along with the completed Form 159) must be mailed to Federal Communications
Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, or sent via overnight mail to U.S.
Bank Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO
be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Bruno Goodworth Network, Inc., 975
Greentree Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15220.
Hossein Hashemzadeh
Deputy Chief, Video Division
Media Bureau

20 See 47 C.F.R. 73.6001(d).

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.