Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Commissioner Pai Statement on Broadband's Impact in South Dakota

Download Options

Released: May 29, 2014


Federal Communications Commission

News Media Information: (202) 418-0500

445 12th Street, SW

Internet: h


Washington, DC 20554

TTY: (888) 835-5322

This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action.

See MCI v. FCC, 515 F.2d 385 (D.C. Cir. 1974).



May 29, 2014

Matthew Berry, (202) 418-2005




America needs to fully enter the digital age—and that starts with our nation’s schools and

libraries. I saw that for myself yesterday in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

During my visit to Sioux Falls New Technology High School, I learned through meetings

with the principal and other school officials how the school integrates a one-to-one program—

that is, one device for each student—into the learning process. At the main branch of the

Siouxland Libraries, I got to see how Internet access empowers library patrons to apply for a job,

take a class, or do their homework.

Sioux Falls is no anomaly. It’s amazing what schools and libraries across South Dakota

have done with so little. Even though promoting broadband across 77,123 square miles is the

definition of a high-cost endeavor, South Dakota schools have received about 30% less per

student than New Jersey schools. And while the Siouxland Libraries stretch their resources so

thinly that some rural libraries only operate three hours a day, library officials told me that

they’ve given up applying for E-Rate funding because the process is so burdensome and the

rewards for rural libraries so few.

In sum, the E-Rate program just isn’t meeting the needs of rural America. E-Rate’s

funding formula favors larger, urban school districts that can afford to hire consultants to

navigate the administrative process and draw every dollar E-Rate makes available to them. In

contrast, E-Rate offers smaller, rural schools and libraries less funding, even when broadband

costs more for them and they don’t have the resources to hire outside help. A sad refrain I’ve

heard over and over is that applying for E-Rate funding just isn’t worth the effort. That’s a

digital divide we shouldn’t tolerate.

The FCC needs to reform E-Rate to make it more user-friendly and target the needs of

students and library patrons. We cannot expect those who teach our children and serve our

communities to master arcane rules that few lawyers or accountants can understand. They

deserve better.


And we can do better. A student-centered E-Rate program1 would cut the red tape. It

would end funding inequities and focus E-Rate on connecting citizens young and old to digital

opportunities. And it would bring more transparency to a process that is hopelessly opaque to

people in the Best Little City in America and beyond.

It’s time for real reform.

1 Remarks of Commissioner Ajit Pai, “Connecting the American Classroom: A Student-Centered E-Rate Program,”

American Enterprise Institute (July 16, 2013), available at

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.