Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Domestic 214 Grant for Transfer of dPi Teleconnect to Amvensys

Download Options

Released: February 7, 2013

Federal Communications Commission

News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
445 12th Street, S.W.
Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830

Washington, D.C. 20554

TTY 202 / 418-2555

DA 13-133

Released: February 7, 2013


Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of dPi Teleconnect, LLC to

Amvensys Capital Group, LLC

WC Docket No. 12-32

Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214,
and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Federal Communication Commission’s (Commission) rules, 47
C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application to
transfer control of dPi Teleconnect, LLC (now Unity Telecom, LLC) (Unity)1 to Amvensys Capital
Group, LLC, f/k/a Amvensys Telecom Holdings, LLC (Amvensys, together with Unity, the
Applicants).2 The Bureau has determined that grant of this Application serves the public interest,3 and
accordingly, the Application is granted pursuant to the Commission’s procedures for domestic section
214 transfer of control applications.4
On February 21, 2012, Lawrence Green filed comments opposing the transaction proposed in the

1 dPi Teleconnect, LLC changed its name to Unity Telecom, LLC on May 18, 2012.
2 Domestic 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of dPi Teleconnect, LLC to Amvensys Capital
Group, LLC, f/k/a Amvensys Telecom Holdings, LLC
, WC Docket No. 12-32 (filed Feb. 3, 2012) (Application);
Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of dPi Teleconnect, LLC to Amvensys Capital Group, LLC, f/k/a
Amvensys Telecom Holdings, LLC
, WC Docket No. 12-32, Public Notice, 27 FCC Rcd 1443 (WCB 2012); Notice
of Removal of Domestic Section 214 Application From Streamlined Treatment
, WC Docket No. 12-32, Public
Notice, 27 FCC Rcd 2305 (WCB 2012). On November 17, 2009, without prior approval from the Commission,
Amvensys acquired all of the membership interests in dPi Teleconnect from dPi Teleconnect's then-current owner,
Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (RentA-Center). Applicants state that they have taken steps to correct any compliance
deficiencies. They are currently operating under Special Temporary Authority that the Bureau granted on February
9, 2012, and renewed on April 9, June 7, July 31, August 20, October 15, and December 14, 2012. Domestic 214
Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of dPi Teleconnect, LLC to Amvensys Capital Group, LLC, f/k/a
Amvensys Telecom Holdings, LLC
, WC Docket No. 12-32, Request for Special Temporary Authority at 2-3 (filed
Feb. 8, 2012). Action on this domestic 214 application is without prejudice to Commission action on other
proceedings or related applications and does not preclude or prejudice any enforcement action related to the
unauthorized transfer of control.
3 Implementation of Further Streamlining Measures for Domestic Section 214 Authorizations, CC Docket No. 01-
150, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 5517, 5540, para. 45 (2002).
4 47 C.F.R. § 63.03.

Application.5 Mr. Green contends that Amvensys’s controlling interest holder and Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Zayed Lateef, is not qualified to control Unity because he is a convicted felon; he lied about
his conviction to state regulators; and he uses questionable means to finance his companies and business
practices.6 Applicants respond that the allegations raised by Mr. Green are mitigated because the
underlying circumstances occurred long ago,7 the alleged misconduct was unadjudicated at the state
commission, and the claims are further mitigated by internal restructuring and other compliance
improvements by Amvensys.8
The concerns raised by Mr. Green do not persuade us to deny the transaction or to impose
conditions on the terms of the transfer. As the Commission held in its 1990 Character Qualifications
, we will take into account how recently the misconduct occurred and efforts made to remedy the
wrong when evaluating whether an applicant has the requisite qualifications to hold an authorization or
license.9 In the case of Mr. Lateef’s felony conviction, Applicants submitted a sworn affidavit stating
that the circumstances arose in 1989 from a check Mr. Lateef wrote on an account with insufficient funds
and that he paid full restitution at the time.10 Based on the amount of time that has lapsed since the
felony, and its surrounding circumstances, we find that concerns arising from the conviction are
mitigated as contemplated in the 1990 Character Qualifications Order.
The Commission previously found that one of the primary purposes of its character policy is to
ensure that licensees will be truthful in their dealings with the Commission; misrepresentation and lack
of candor raise serious concerns as to the likelihood of such truthfulness.11 Applicants deny that Mr.

5 Comments of Lawrence Green, WC Docket No. 12-32 (filed Feb. 21, 2012) (Green Comments). Mr. Green also
filed letters on March 7 and July 18, 2012 opposing grant of the transaction. Letter from Lawrence Green to FCC,
WC Docket No. 12-32 (filed on March 7, 2012) (Green March 7 Ex Parte Letter); Letter from Lawrence Green to
FCC, WC Docket No. 12-32 (filed on July 18, 2012) (claiming that Mr. Lateef failed to properly file income
taxes). There is no evidence in the record supporting Mr. Green’s claim.
6 Green Comments at 1; Green March 7 Ex Parte Letter at 2.
7 Reply Comments of dPi Teleconnect, WC Docket No. 12-32 at 3-4 (filed Mar. 1, 2012) (Applicant Reply).
8 Letter from John J. Heitmann and Joan M. Griffin to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 12-32
(filed May 18, 2012) (May 18 Ex Parte Letter). See Applicant Reply at 3-4 (citing WorldCom, Inc. and its
Subsidiaries (debtors-in-possession), Transferor, and MCl, Inc., Transferee, Applications for Consent to Transfer
and/or Assign Section 214 Authorizations, Section 310 Licenses, and Submarine Cable Landing Licenses,
Docket No. 02-215, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 26484, 26494 n.57 (2003) (WorldCom-MCI
; Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast Licensing, Policy Statement and Order, 5 FCC
Rcd 3252, 3252, para. 5 (1990) (1990 Character Qualifications Order)).
9 1990 Character Qualifications Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 3252, para. 5.
10 Applicant Reply at 2-4 and Attach. 1.
11 Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC, EB Docket No. 11-71, Order to Show Cause, Hearing Designation
Order, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 26 FCC Rcd 6520, 6530. para. 28 (2011) (citing Character Policy
, 102 FCC 2d 1179 (1986) and stating that the fundamental importance of truthfulness and candor on the
part of applicants and licensees in their dealings with the Commission is well established. See FCC v. WOKO, Inc.,
329 U.S. 223 (1946); Lebanon Valley Radio, Inc., Decision, 35 FCC 2d 243 (Rev. Bd. 1972); Nick J. Chaconas,
Decision, 28 FCC 2d 231 (Rev. Bd. 1971)).

Lateef intentionally provided false or misleading information to the state commissions.12 Although we
take allegations of nondisclosure seriously, a thorough review of the record provides no definitive
evidence that the nondisclosure was intentional. We are persuaded that, on a going forward basis,
Amvensys has a plan in place to ensure accurate, timely, and compliant dealings with the Commission.
Specifically, Amvensys states that it has taken the following steps over the last three years: Amvensys
replaced the Unity management team to ensure adherence to regulatory requirements, including section
214 obligations; the Amvensys Legal & Regulatory Department replaced outside counsel and now
coordinates with management on a weekly basis to ensure regulatory compliance and accuracy; and
Amvensys hired a general counsel and is interviewing candidates for a Compliance Director position.13
Further, the Enforcement Bureau and Amvensys entered into a Consent Decree terminating the
Enforecement Bureau’s investigation into the unauthorized transfer of control of Unity and adopting a
Compliance Plan.14 We find that these steps provide sufficient assurance that Amvensys and its affiliates
will comply with their statutory and regulatory requirements. Accordingly, we find that there is a lack of
record evidence to support a determination that Mr. Lateef is unqualified to hold a section 214 license or
authorization from the Commission. Mr. Green’s other claims that Mr. Lateef will mismanage Unity or
fund it from questionable sources are speculative.15 We find that the transaction is likely to result in
public interest benefits, including uninterrupted provision of the prepaid telecommunications services
that Unity provides to its customers.16 The Bureau concludes, upon consideration of the record, that
grant of the application will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity.
Pursuant to section 1.103 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103, the consent granted
herein is effective upon the release of this Public Notice. Petitions for reconsideration under section
1.106 or applications for review under section 1.115 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.106,
1.115, may be filed within 30 days of the date of this Public Notice.
For further information, please contact Dennis Johnson, (202) 418-0809, Competition Policy
Division, Wireline Competition Bureau.

12 Applicant Reply at 4-5 and Attach. 1.
13 May 18 Ex Parte Letter at 2-3. Letter from John Heitmann and Joan M. Griffin, Counsel to Applicants, to
Marlene Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 12-32 (filed Sept. 24, 2012).
14 Amvensys Capital Group, LLC, Order and Consent Decree, DA 13-85 (rel. Feb. 7, 2013).
15 WorldCom-MCI Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 26494 n.57. For example, Mr. Green alleges that Mr. Lateef
mismanaged a reseller of electric utility service in Texas that eventually went out of business. Green Comments at
1-2; Green March 7 Ex Parte Letter at 1-2. Applicants state that the electric utility’s discontinuance of service was
unrelated to Mr. Lateef’s 15 percent ownership interest in the entity. Letter from John Heitmann and Joan M.
Griffin, Counsel to Applicants, to Marlene Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 12-32 at 2-4 (filed Mar. 30,
16 Application at 7-8.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.