Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Jeannine M. Mason

Download Options

Released: August 22, 2014

Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-1214

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of



Jeannine M. Mason


File No.: EB-FIELDWR-12-00004903


NAL/Acct. No.: 201332800007

Licensee of Station KTZZ(FM)


FRN: 0022857825

Conrad, Montana


Facility ID No.: 81886


Adopted: August 21, 2014

Released: August 22, 2014

By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau:



We find that Jeannine M. Mason operated a studio-transmitter link (STL) station without

a FCC license. In light of Ms. Mason’s documented inability to pay and history of compliance, however,

we do not impose a forfeiture. Nevertheless, we admonish Ms. Mason for her violations and warn her that

future violations may result in substantial forfeitures, regardless of her financial situation.


Specifically, we find that Ms. Mason, licensee of Station KTZZ(FM), in Conrad,

Montana, willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended

(Act),1 by operating a STL station without a FCC authorization.




On July 24, 2013, the Enforcement Bureau’s Denver Office (Denver Office) issued a

Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL) proposing a $10,000 forfeiture against Ms. Mason for

operating a STL station associated with Station KTZZ(FM) without a FCC authorization.2 In her NAL

Response, Ms. Mason does not deny the violations, but states that she is unable to pay the proposed

forfeiture and provides financial documentation to support her claim.3




The proposed forfeiture amount in this case was assessed in accordance with Section

503(b) of the Act,4 Section 1.80 of the Commission’s rules,5 and the Forfeiture Policy Statement.6 In

1 47 U.S.C. § 301.

2 Jeannine M. Mason, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 28 FCC Rcd 10748 (Enf. Bur. 2013) (NAL). A

comprehensive recitation of the facts and history of this case can be found in the NAL and is incorporated herein by


3 See Response from Jeannine M. Mason to Denver Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau (Sep. 13, 2013)

(on file in EB-FIELDWR-12-00004903) (NAL Response). As stated in the NAL, an agent from the Denver Office

performed a follow-up inspection and confirmed that the operation of the STL station had ceased. NAL, 28 FCC

Rcd at 10748, para. 3.

4 47 U.S.C. § 503(b).

5 47 C.F.R. § 1.80.

6 The Commission’s Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the

Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recons. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999)

(Forfeiture Policy Statement).


Federal Communications Commission

DA 14-1214

examining Ms. Mason’s NAL Response, Section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act requires that the Commission take

into account the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation and, with respect to the violator,

the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may



As Ms. Mason does not deny any of the facts stated in the NAL, we affirm the NAL’s

findings and conclude that Ms. Mason willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by

operating an STL station without an FCC authorization.8


Although Ms. Mason does not deny the violations, she requests cancellation of the $10,000

proposed forfeiture, asserting that she is unable to pay the penalty.9 She supports her inability to pay

argument with financial documentation, including three years of tax returns.10

With regard to an individual

or entity’s inability to pay claim, the Commission has determined that, in general, gross income or revenues

are the best indicator of an ability to pay a forfeiture.11 We have reviewed the documents provide by Ms.

Mason, and we find sufficient basis to downwardly adjust the proposed forfeiture to impose no penalty

due to her demonstrated inability to pay. We also have reviewed our records and determined that Ms.

Mason has a history of compliance with the Commission’s rules.


Nevertheless, we find that it is appropriate to admonish Ms. Mason for willful and repeated

violation of Section 301 of the Act. We also warn Ms. Mason that any future violations of the

Commission’s rules may result in substantial monetary penalties, regardless of her financial condition.




Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act and Sections

0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Rules, the proposed forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand

dollars ($10,000) issued to Jeannine M. Mason WILL NOT BE IMPOSED, and the finding of willful and

repeated violations of Section 301 of the Act against Jeannine M. Mason IS AFFIRMED.12


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jeannine M. Mason IS ADMONISHED for willful

and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Act.13

10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by both First Class

and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Jeannine M. Mason at her address of record, and to her

counsel, Steven T. Potts, PLLC, 625 Central Avenue West, Suite 200, Great Falls, MT 59404-2874.


Rebecca L. Dorch

Regional Director, Western Region

Enforcement Bureau

7 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E).

8 See NAL, supra note 2.

9 See NAL Response at 1–2.

10 See id. at 1–2, Attachments 1–3.

11 See, e.g., Local Long Distance, Inc., Order of Forfeiture, 15 FCC Rcd 24385 (2000) (forfeiture not deemed

excessive where it represented approximately 7.9 percent of the violator’s gross revenues).

12 47 U.S.C. §§ 301, 503(b); 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.204, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80(f)(4).

13 47 U.S.C. § 301.


Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.