Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Remarks of Commissioner Rosenworcel, APCO International Conference

Download Options

Released: August 6, 2014






AUGUST 6, 2014

Good afternoon. Thank you for that kind introduction. Thank you also to the Association

of Public Safety Communications Officers for the gracious reception I’ve received from

everyone here in New Orleans. You certainly take southern hospitality seriously.

I want to start today by acknowledging that we are celebrating the birthday of two 80

year-olds. This is APCO’s 80th annual conference. It’s an important milestone. And back in

Washington we are celebrating another 80th birthday—at the Federal Communications


The similarities, however, do not end there. Just look at the documents that got both of

us started.

In 1934 APCO published a memorandum. In it, you determined that police radio had

been adopted by most cities in the United States. So you decided that it was time to call the first

yearly conference for public safety officials. Eighty years later that still seems like a good idea.

But in 1934 APCO was not the only prominent organization thinking about the

importance of public safety communications. Congress was thinking about it, too. Because in

1934 Congress passed the Communications Act—the law that created the FCC. The very first

sentence of that law directs the agency to promote “safety of life and property through the use of

wire and radio communication.”

So from the beginning, APCO and the FCC were made for each other. Both are built on

the principle that public safety comes first. No wonder then that one of the speakers at the very

first APCO conference 80 years ago was Chairman of the FCC.

So by being here today, I am continuing a proud tradition. But I also am celebrating a

personal milestone. As some of you may remember, my very first speech after being sworn into

office was at the APCO Annual Conference two years ago in Minneapolis.

During that first speech I committed to spend my first year in office visiting 911 call

centers once a month. So I feel privileged to say I have been able to hear from so many of you

personally. Each visit is a new experience. But no matter the location, some things are constant.

Emergency operators always amaze. Because when crises mount, they answer calls with steely

calm and help ensure that help is on the way.

So rather than ending my visits after year one, I have continued them. That means I have

seen public safety officials at work from Alaska to Arkansas, California to Colorado, Vermont to

Virginia—and a whole lot of places in between.


These visits have taught me that in Washington, what is trite is true—leaving town is a

good thing! Sitting down with public safety officials in urban areas, rural areas, and everything

in between reminds me that our policies have real impact on real lives.

You also have shown me that our present policies have gaps—gaps that deserve our

attention. Places where technology is moving on and public safety communications also need to

advance. By working together I know we can address these places and close these gaps. And if

we do—I believe we can make every community in this country safer.

So today I want to update you on our efforts in Washington. I want to focus on three

things—efforts to deploy texting-to-911; efforts to improve location accuracy for wireless 911

calls; and efforts to develop a nationwide, interoperable wireless broadband network for first


First up is texting.

The challenge to the continued success of 911 has always been the increasing complexity

of our communications systems. Every new way of reaching out creates new possibilities—but

also new difficulties. Still, over time we have made steady progress bringing new technology

into the 911 framework. We expanded 911 service to mobile phones. We made 911 an essential

feature of interconnected VoIP service. We are now poised to make the same kind of progress

with texting.

Texting has become second nature to millions of Americans. Many of us use our phones

for more texting than speaking. We use texting to reach out to friends and family, to confirm

plans, to vote in contests online and on the air, and to donate to charities and campaigns.

Later this week, the FCC is set to codify policies that make sure that providers of text

messages have systems capable of supporting text-to-911 service.

This means that texting

services that have become so essential for so many of us can be there for everyone when

reaching out in crisis.

I know how critical these services can be because I know texting-to-911 can save lives.

It already has in Vermont—where I had the privilege of seeing the service in action in

Burlington. I also know that texting-to-911 can be a game changer for those who are deaf or

have speech difficulties. In fact, I had the privilege of seeing this up close in Frederick,

Maryland, where the service is available and the Maryland School for the Deaf is located.

So I know first-hand the benefits of having texting-to-911 in place. But I also know it

brings new difficulties. From my visits around the country I can tell you that educating the

public matters. Because voice calling still offers a speed and response that is superior to texting.

It offers the ability for conversation that a drop down menu of responses to an emergency text

does not. My visits around the country also make me mindful that you have work to do and

funds to secure to make texting viable. So as we work to ensure that carriers provide text-to-911

capabilities, know that you are in control. This will be deployed only when you are ready.



Getting this capability in public safety answering points across the country will take some

time, but it’s worth the effort. So I encourage you to take a look at the decision we will vote on

later this week, give us your feedback, and then help us get this service in place—everywhere.

Second, I want to update you on wireless 911 location accuracy.

Let me start by noting that last August, I also headed south. Not all the way to New

Orleans, but just north of here in Arkansas. In Arkansas, I spent my time in and around Little

Rock. I talked to rural broadband providers, I saw new education technology in action at a local

school, I got time to tour the 1990’s at the Clinton Presidential Library. I also had my first taste

of fried pickles—which are better than you might think.

While in Little Rock I visited a 911 call center with staff from Senator Mark Pryor’s

Office. The visit was memorable. The center was small but active. The desks were humming as

calls came in. The pride the public safety officials had for their work was palatable.

But the one thing that was most memorable? I learned that in the city of Little Rock if

you call 911 using your wireless phone in the corner of the 911 call center your call will not get

routed to Little Rock. Instead, it will be answered by a 911 call center in North Little Rock all

the way on the other side of the Arkansas River.

That’s unnerving. Because when you make a 911 call location accuracy matters. That

kind of imprecision from calling 911 with a wireless phone should make all of us concerned.

Because when emergency strikes and you call 911 from any phone—including a wireless

phone—you want first responders to find you.

This matters—a lot. Today, more than 70 percent of 911 calls are from wireless phones.

That is more than 400,000 calls across the country every day. And this number is only going to

get bigger. Because for roughly 2 in 5 households right now, their wireless phone is their only

phone. Here in Louisiana it is a little more than 1 in 3. In Arkansas, where I was last year, one

half of all adults and 60 percent of all children now live in a home without a landline phone. So

wireless calling to 911 is here to stay—and poised to grow.

But our rules that provide first responders with information about where we are when we

call 911 are stranded in calling practices of the last century.

So today, under the FCC’s rules, if you call 911 from a wired phone, first responders

know where you are and where to send help.

If you call 911 from a wireless phone outdoors, the FCC has standards that help ensure

first responders can locate you and send assistance.

But if you call 911 from a wireless phone indoors, you should cross your fingers and

hope and pray, because no location accuracy standards apply.



This is an unacceptable gap in our policies. It does not reflect the way we depend on

wireless service today.

Fortunately, this issue has caught the attention of some powerful people. People like

Senator Pryor, who has become a champion on this issue. He has called for efforts to improve

location accuracy for 911 calls made from wireless phones—not just in Little Rock, but across

the country. In fact, he held a hearing earlier this year in the Senate to explore the challenges of

location accuracy. You might remember, because one of your own—APCO President Gigi

Smith—testified at the hearing. She was a great witness and a terrific spokesperson for first


Hearings have consequences. So on the heels of that hearing—and after a little cajoling

on my part—the FCC started a rulemaking to narrow this gap and fix this problem.

But APCO and its membership did not sit on the sidelines.

You heard the call and you

did what you do best.

You brought together public safety officials, equipment manufacturers,

and wireless carriers to have a frank dialogue about closing this gap and improving wireless

location accuracy.

So I am excited to report that APCO has worked with CTIA, myself, and others to

develop a set of four core principles that are supported by the wireless carriers. I believe these

four principles are the foundation for a solution.

Dispatchable, verifiable, flexible, and

reasonable time.

First, dispatchable.

The gold standard for location accuracy is dispatchable location—the

actual floor plus office suite, apartment, hotel room, or classroom.

Second, verifiable.

Any solution must include verifiable targets to measure accuracy.

Third, flexible.

Technologies advance rapidly.

A solution must be sufficiently flexible to

accommodate technological advancements like next generation 911.

Fourth and finally, reasonable time.

The perfect cannot be the enemy of the good.


we must continue to strive towards achieving dispatchable location, we must be honest that this

goal could take some time.

So we need solid interim benchmarks along the way.

To be clear, we are not there yet.

We still have work to do.

But thanks to APCO, we are

on track to reach a solution for wireless 911 location accuracy.

So stay involved as our

rulemaking continues—because we are on our way to making wireless 911 more safe.

Finally, I want to end with the First Responders Network Authority. You probably know

it as FirstNet. FirstNet is the independent authority charged with developing a nationwide,

interoperable, public safety wireless broadband network using spectrum in the 700 MHz band.

Now compared to institutions like APCO and the FCC, FirstNet is still in its infancy.

There is nothing eight decades old about it.

In fact, I would call it a public safety startup.



Because I recently had the opportunity to visit their headquarters and I can tell you that they are

bringing a little slice of Silicon Valley to Reston, Virginia. The offices are a bit sparse, but just

like the most successful startups the place is teeming with energy. You feel it when you walk in

the door. They are doing something big.

It’s also clear that this vigor comes straight from the top. The new Chair of the Board is

Sue Swenson. She brings years of communications experience to her new role—and a passion

for public safety. Plus, General Manager TJ Kennedy is one of your own. He can run the show

at the office in Reston, but he can also regale you with stories of swinging from helicopters as a

police officer.

These are the right kinds of people for the job. Because this is a bold undertaking.

Developing a nationwide network for public safety is not a task for those who think small.

Getting it done will require grit, gumption, and moving beyond the conventional wisdom. But

historic efforts usually do.

Next up for FirstNet is outreach. Because the most important input FirstNet gets is not

from Washington. It is from those on the front lines. FirstNet has already met with more than

20,000 stakeholders. That’s a lot. But to take their work beyond the startup phase, they will

need to double down on reaching out. So I hope you will get involved and offer your insights.

This Fall, there will be lots of opportunity to do so.

Because FirstNet just launched what

are called Initial Consultations under the law.

This is an essential step in the development of

state plans.

FirstNet started with Maryland but has already planned these consultations in

Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington—and there are more to come.

But that’s not all. FirstNet is in the development stages of preparing a draft request for a

proposal. This is the beginning of the critical process to identify a comprehensive network

solution for the nationwide network.

And on the engineering front, the technical team in Boulder, Colorado has been hard at

work recruiting experts in network development. This is the team that will facilitate the

technical aspects of the network build. In fact, this hiring is only a small part of the bigger

picture. Because the organization as a whole has plans to rapidly mature with regional outreach

positions to be hired. These new members of the tem will serve pivotal roles in messaging and

education efforts.

So, it looks like FirstNet will be busy over the next few months.

Again, get involved. Because FirstNet cannot do it alone. Remember this is more than a

nationwide public safety network built on public-private partnerships. This is your network.

Make it yours by providing local input, know-how, and support.

Now will there be real

challenges? Of course. But are you up to it? I think you are. Because first responders perform

Herculean acts every day. And with the people in this room from every state behind it, FirstNet

can become a real force.



So there you have it. We are making progress. We are modernizing 911 by bringing on

board texting-to-911. We have work underway to enhance wireless 911 location accuracy. And

we have a small startup poised to do big things with FirstNet.

So for 80 years old, I think this conference community is looking pretty good. We are

pretty active, too, at the FCC. But for all that draws attention to the agency, I am proudest when

we put public safety first. I know you do that every day. I am grateful for the work you do—and

excited by the good things we can do together.

Thank you.


Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.