Rural Broadband Experiments Application Process Public Notice
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th St., S.W.
News Media Information 202 / 418-0513
Washington, D.C. 20554
Released: August 19, 2014
WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU ANNOUNCES APPLICATION PROCESS FOR
ENTITIES INTERESTED IN PARTICPATING IN THE RURAL BROADBAND
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1
II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 2
III. APPLICATION PROCESS.................................................................................................................... 3
A. Application Overview...................................................................................................................... 3
B. Application Requirements ............................................................................................................... 7
1. General Information Regarding Applications ........................................................................... 7
2. Applicant Information ............................................................................................................. 13
3. Disclosure of Bidding Arrangements ...................................................................................... 14
4. Ownership Disclosure Requirements ...................................................................................... 15
5. Project Information.................................................................................................................. 16
6. Bid Forms................................................................................................................................ 17
7. Descriptive Data Forms........................................................................................................... 36
8. Certifications ........................................................................................................................... 37
C. Additional Rules and Disclaimers ................................................................................................. 38
1. Prohibited Communications .................................................................................................... 38
2. Due Diligence.......................................................................................................................... 50
3. Compliance with Antitrust Laws............................................................................................. 57
4. Commission Red Light Rules.................................................................................................. 59
5. USF Debarment....................................................................................................................... 60
IV. SELECTION METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS ............................................................................ 61
A. Methodology.................................................................................................................................. 61
B. Winning Bids Selection Process .................................................................................................... 62
V. POST-SELECTION PROCEDURES .................................................................................................. 64
A. Challenge Process .......................................................................................................................... 64
B. Post-Selection Review ................................................................................................................... 67
1. General Information ................................................................................................................ 67
2. Required Disclosures and Documentation .............................................................................. 68
VI. CONTACT INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 72
By this Public Notice, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) outlines the process
that will be used to award up to $100 million in rural broadband experiment support to bring next-
generation voice and broadband service to high-cost areas of the country.1 Specifically, we summarize
the procedures, terms, and conditions governing the submission of rural broadband experiments
applications, the post-selection review of winning bidders and other important information for parties
seeking rural broadband experiment funding.
In the Rural Broadband Experiments Order, the Commission established certain
parameters and requirements for the rural broadband experiments. Specifically, it adopted a budget of
$100 million for funding experiments in both high-cost and extremely high-cost price cap areas focused
on bringing robust, scalable voice and broadband-capable networks to residential and small business
locations in rural communities.2 This budget is apportioned into three separate funding categories: $75
million for projects in high-cost areas proposing to offer broadband service at 25 megabits per second
(Mbps) downstream/5 Mbps upstream; $15 million for projects in high-cost areas proposing to offer
broadband service of 10 Mbps downstream/1 Mbps upstream; and $10 million for projects proposing to
serve extremely high-cost areas with broadband service of 10 Mbps downstream/1 Mbps upstream.3 The
Commission encouraged the deployment of experiments aimed at providing new and innovative rural
broadband solutions. The Commission stated “ . . . we hope to learn more about interest in the
deployment of various fixed wireless solutions, including broadband services using TV white space
and/or hybrid solutions that combine fiber and fixed wireless technologies to offer broadband services in
extremely high-cost areas.”4 The Commission concluded that rural broadband experiment proposals
would be selected for funding solely based on cost effectiveness determined using two metrics – one
metric for census blocks eligible for Phase II support as calculated by the Connect America Cost Model
and one for census blocks identified as extremely high-cost in the model.5 The Commission also outlined
the conditions that entities participating in the experiments are required to meet to continue to receive
such support, including specific eligibility, build-out, and accountability requirements, and established the
measures to ensure compliance with these conditions.6
Formal applications for participation in the rural broadband experiments are due 90 days
after the July 14, 2014 release of the Rural Broadband Experiments Order. Because this 90-day period
See Connect America Fund; ETC Annual Reports and Certifications, WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 14-58, Report and
Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 14-98 (rel. July 14, 2014) (Rural Broadband Experiments
2 Id. at para. 7.
3 Id. at paras. 24-29.
4 Id. at para. 28.
5 Id. at paras. 30-38, 45 n.79.
6 Id. at paras. 72-85, 88-96.
expires on a weekend before a Federal holiday, the deadline for applications will be on Tuesday,
October 14, 2014.7
The Bureau will conduct the application process over the Internet using the FCC Auction
System. The Bureau will not accept applications in hard copy or through the Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS).8
The Commission makes no warranty whatsoever with respect to the FCC Auction
System. In no event shall the Commission, or any of its officers, employees, or agents, be liable for any
damages whatsoever (including, but not limited to, loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of
business information, or any other loss) arising out of or relating to the existence, furnishing, functioning,
or use of the FCC Auction System that is accessible to potential applicants in connection with this
auction. Moreover, no obligation or liability will arise out of the Commission’s technical, programming,
or other advice or service provided in connection with the FCC Auction System. We therefore encourage
entities to leave adequate time for filing their applications prior to the October 14th deadline.
Those wishing to participate in this auction must submit a formal application (FCC Form
5610) electronically prior to 6:00 p.m. ET, October 14, 2014, following the electronic filing procedures
in this Public Notice and comply with all provisions outlined in this Public Notice and applicable
General Information Regarding Applications
The selection process consists of two parts. In the first phase, each entity interested in
participating in the rural broadband experiments must file an application, on FCC Form 5610, in which it
certifies under penalty of perjury as to its qualifications. Each applicant must take seriously its duties and
responsibilities and carefully determine before filing an application that it has the legal, technical, and
financial resources to participate in the rural broadband experiments and be able to meet the public
interest obligations associated with the receipt of such support. In the second phase of the process, each
winning bidder will be required to file additional information that Commission staff will use to conduct a
technical and financial review (FCC Form 5620).
Every entity seeking rural broadband experiment support must file an application
electronically via the FCC Auction System prior to 6:00 p.m. ET on October 14, 2014. The application
will contain basic information about the applicant and the proposed project(s), bid forms for each
proposed project, a descriptive data form, and certifications required by the Commission. The application
will be used by the Bureau to rank proposals and determine which of the proposals is the most cost-
effective within each funding category. Below we describe more fully the information disclosures and
7 Because the contents of the formal application are subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), this deadline is contingent on receipt of PRA approval prior to
this date. Therefore, the Bureau may adjust this deadline as necessary. We intend to announce a window of at least
15 days prior to the deadline for interested parties to file formal applications and will adjust the deadline accordingly
to provide such a window. On August 18, 2014, the Bureau published a 30-day notice in the Federal Register
seeking comment on Forms 5610 and 5620. See Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission, 79 Fed. Reg. 48747 (Aug. 18, 2014).
8 Once OMB approves the PRA request, the Bureau intends to release a public notice announcing the beginning of
the application filing window and making available to potential applicants the bid form and descriptive data form,
certifications required in the application. Each applicant is subject to the Commission’s rule prohibiting
certain communications, as described below.9
Each applicant bears full responsibility for submitting an accurate, complete, and timely
application. Each applicant must certify on its application under penalty of perjury that it is legally,
technically, financially, and otherwise qualified to receive universal service support funding.10 An
applicant may modify its application within the filing window; however, once the filing window closes at
6:00 p.m. ET on October 14, 2014, applications can no longer be modified. The onus is on the applicant
to ensure that the information contained in its application is accurate and timely.
An applicant may submit multiple bids within its application, but may not submit more
than one application for participation in the rural broadband experiments. If a party submits multiple
applications, only the latest submission prior to the deadline will be accepted for filing.
Each applicant also should note that submission of an application constitutes a
representation by the certifying official that he or she is an authorized representative of the applicant, that
he or she has read the form’s instructions and certifications, and that the contents of the application, its
certifications, and any attachments are true and correct. Submission of a false certification to the
Commission may result in penalties, including monetary forfeitures, the forfeiture of universal service
support, license forfeitures, ineligibility to participate in future auctions, and/or criminal prosecution.
Once the Bureau announces the winning bidders, the proposals submitted by the winning
bidders will be made publicly available. However, in order to prevent these proposals from affecting
another potential bidder’s behavior in the Phase II competitive bidding process, all other proposals will
remain confidential, pending the completion of the Phase II competitive bidding process.
In FCC Form 5610, each applicant must provide: the identity and address of the
applicant; the applicant’s legal classification; a responsible party for the applicant; a contact party for the
applicant; and the identities of up to three individuals authorized to make or withdraw a bid on behalf of
the applicant. This threshold information will ensure that Commission staff can properly identify each
applicant and know who to notify after selecting winning bidders.
Disclosure of Bidding Arrangements
Each applicant will be required to identify in its application all parties in interest to any
agreements relating to the participation of the applicant in the competitive bidding for rural broadband
experiment support and certify the accuracy of this information under penalty of perjury.11 If an applicant
has had discussions, but has not reached an agreement by the application deadline, it should not include
the names of parties to the discussions on its application.
Ownership Disclosure Requirements
Each applicant must comply with the ownership disclosure standards required by section
1.2112 of the Commission’s rules.12 Specifically, in completing the application, an applicant will be
required to disclose fully information on the ownership structure of the applicant, including both direct
9 See infra paras. 38-49.
10 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.21001(b)(6).
11 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.21001(b)(3), (b)(4).
12 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2112.
and indirect ownership interests of 10 percent or more.13 Each applicant is responsible for ensuring that
information submitted in its application is complete and accurate.
Pursuant to the Rural Broadband Experiments Order, formal proposals must include
background information on the applicant and its qualifications to provide voice and broadband service; a
description of the proposed projects, service areas, planned voice and broadband service offerings,
including a description of what Lifeline services the applicant will offer if awarded support, whether the
applicant will have a broadband offering for low-income consumers, and whether it will permit qualifying
consumers to apply the Lifeline discount to bundled voice and data services; the technology or
technologies to be used; and the number of locations, including community anchor institutions, within the
project area.14 The Bureau will not be selecting applicants based on the information contained in the
formal proposal; rather, as described below, winning bidders will be selected solely based on the
objective metric of cost-effectiveness.
Each applicant must upload a completed bid form in .csv file format for each project on
which it bids. This bid form will be used to rank proposals from the most cost-effective to the least cost-
effective. The bid form will be released by the Bureau prior to the opening of the filing window.
Applications without a completed bid form will not be considered for experiment funding.
As noted above, applicants will be required to upload a completed bid form for each
individual project on which they bid. For example, if an applicant is submitting bids for five separate
projects, the applicant will be required to upload five separate bid forms. Each bid form requires an
applicant to provide: a unique FCC Registration Number,15 the funding category for the project (one, two,
or three); a unique project identification number; the census blocks to be served (CBFIPS); the total
number of eligible locations to be served; the total number of extremely high-cost locations to be served;
and the total support requested. If the applicant proposes a project in funding category three (serving only
extremely high-cost census blocks), the applicant will be required to identify whether that project is
contingent on winning a separate project in funding categories one or two.
Applicants are reminded that the Commission adopted per-project funding limits for each
experiment funding category to ensure that support is awarded to multiple projects within each category.
Specifically, applicants may receive no more than $20 million per project in funding category one; no
more than $7.5 million per project in funding category two; and no more than $5 million per project in
funding category three.16 Applicants also are subject to an overall limit of $20 million per entity,
including its affiliates.17 This limit applies to the total amount of funding an applicant may be awarded
14 See Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 49.
15 Each applicant should use only one FCC Registration Number for all of its bids.
16 Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 41.
17 Id. at para. 42. An affiliate is defined as a person that (directly or indirectly) owns or controls, is owned or
controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with, another person. The term “own” means to own an
equity interest (or the equivalent thereof) of more than 10 percent. Person is defined to include an individual,
partnership, association, joint-stock company, trust, or corporation. 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(2), (39).
across all three funding categories.18 This limit also applies in situations where an entity is in more than
one consortium.19 Once an applicant reaches the per-project or per-entity funding limits, it will not be
considered for any further rural broadband experiment support, even if its bids are the most cost-effective.
Bid Project Identifiers
Each applicant must identify each bid it submits with a unique project identifier. This
identifier will be sequential and number-based. For example, the first bid form an applicant submits
should be identified as project number (1), the second bid form the applicant submits should be identified
as project number (2), and so on. The sample bid forms below provide further guidance.20
FCC Registration Numbers
Each applicant must utilize a FCC Registration Number (FRN). Any applicant that
currently does not have a FRN must first register with the Commission’s “Commission Registration
System” (CORES), after which it will be assigned a FRN. In the case of multiple entities forming a
partnership to submit a single application, we require only one entity in the partnership to be registered
with a FRN.
The purpose of the FRN is two-fold. First, each applicant will be required to log in to the
FCC Auction System using its specific FRN. Additionally, an applicant must identify each of its bids
with its respective FRN. The FRN will be combined with the bid project ID to ensure that each bid has a
unique identifier. For example, if an entity submits two separate bids for projects in funding category
one, each bid will be identified by a combination of the applicant’s FRN and bid project ID. The sample
bid forms below provide further guidance.
18 For example, if an entity is awarded $18 million in funding category 1, that entity and any of its affiliates would
be precluded from winning support for another project that exceeds $2 million, regardless of whether the second
project was also submitted in funding category one, or was submitted in funding categories two or three.
19 For example, if an applicant is a member of consortium A, which is awarded $15 million in support for its project,
but is also a member of consortium B (with an entirely different group of entities than consortium A) that submitted
a less cost-effective project requesting $10 million in support, consortium B would be precluded from winning
because the applicant overlapping both consortia would exceed the $20 million per-entity limit.
20 As noted above, applicants are required to upload a separate bid form for each project on which they bid. See
supra paras. 17-18. As shown in the sample bid forms, separate bid forms are signified by the double waved line.
listed for Project
listed for Project 2.
Funding Category Identifiers
Each applicant must identify the funding category type for each of their bids. Consistent
with the funding categories adopted in the Rural Broadband Experiments Order, applicants should
identify projects in high-cost areas offering at least one service plan of 25 Mbps downstream/5 Mbps
upstream or higher as funding category one, projects in high-cost areas offering at least one service plan
that provides at least 10 Mbps downstream/1 Mbps upstream, but not 25 Mbps downstream/5 Mbps
upstream, as funding category two, and projects proposing to serve exclusively extremely high-cost areas
as funding category three.21 The sample bid forms below provide further guidance.
Project 1 seeks support in
funding category 1.
Project 2 seeks support in
funding category 1.
The Commission recognized that certain applicants proposing projects in funding
category three may only be interested in undertaking that project if they also are selected to receive
support in funding categories one or two. We address these contingent bidding situations below.22
21 See generally Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at paras. 24-29.
22 See infra paras. 34-35.
Census Block Identifiers
As directed by the Commission,23 the Bureau has released a list of census blocks eligible
for support in the rural broadband experiments, with the amount of support determined by the model for
each block, and the number of locations in each of those blocks.24
Each applicant must identify the census block identification number (CBFIPS) for each
census block it proposes to serve in each project for which it bids. For example, if a project proposes to
serve 100 census blocks, the CBFIPS for all 100 census blocks must be listed on the applicant’s bid form.
The sample bid forms below provide further guidance.
Project 1 proposes to serve
three census blocks.
Project 2 proposes to serve
two census blocks.
In the Rural Broadband Experiments Order, the Commission adopted a 25 percent
bidding credit for applicants seeking support for proposed experiments in Tribal areas.25 Bids eligible for
this credit must propose to serve exclusively Tribal census blocks; if a bid proposes to serve even one
census block that is not designated as Tribal, it will not receive the Tribal bidding credit. Applicants
should consult the list released by the Bureau on July 25, 2014 to ascertain which census blocks are
designated as Tribal for purposes of the rural broadband experiments.26 Applicants have the burden of
ensuring that any bids submitted for which they expect to receive the Tribal bidding credit encompass
only Tribal census blocks. The sample bid form below provides further guidance.
23 Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 15 n.38.
24 Wireline Competition Bureau Releases List of Census Blocks Eligible for Rural Broadband Experiments and
Announces Enhancements to Map Depicting Initial Phase II Eligible Areas, WC Docket No. 10-90, Public Notice,
DA 14-1021 (Wireline Comp. Bur. rel. July 25, 2014) (Rural Broadband Experiments Eligible Areas PN). As
described more fully in that Public Notice, the list of eligible census blocks indicates which blocks are deemed to be
Tribal lands for purposes of the rural broadband experiments.
25 Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 37.
26 See Rural Broadband Experiments Eligible Areas PN.
All census blocks in
this bid are designated
This census block is NOT
designated as Tribal.
In this example, the applicant’s first bid consists entirely of census blocks designated as Tribal for the
rural broadband experiments. As a result, the 25 percent Tribal bidding credit would be applied to the
amount of support requested by the applicant per eligible locations to be served,27 and compared against
the model-determined support per eligible locations to serve those same census blocks. Conversely, the
applicant’s second bid contains three census blocks designated as Tribal and one census block not
designated as Tribal; as such, the applicant’s project would not qualify for the Tribal bidding credit.
Total Support Amount Requested
Each applicant must provide the total amount of support it is requesting for each bid it
submits. We remind applicants seeking funding for category one and category two that the total support
they request to serve the census blocks that encompass their bid should be at or below the model-
estimated support to serve those same census blocks. As a result, applicants should consult the list
released by the Bureau to determine the amount of support determined by the model for each of the
census blocks on which it is bidding.28 The information released by the Bureau shows the annual
support amount; because the Commission is providing support over a 10-year term, the maximum
bid for a given block would be ten times the annual support amount. The sample bid form below
provides further guidance.
27 If an applicant’s bid includes “split” census blocks that contain both eligible locations and extremely high-cost
locations, it should include all of those locations on its bid form, as they will be included in its cost-effectiveness
calculation. See infra para. 32. Similarly, if an applicant determines it is economically feasible to serve certain
extremely high-cost locations in adjacent extremely high-cost census blocks, it may add those locations to its bid
form, and those locations will be included in its cost-effectiveness calculation. See infra para. 33.
28 See Rural Broadband Experiments Eligible Areas PN.
Total dollar amount of support requested
to serve these five census blocks over a
10-year term of support.
In this example, the total amount of annual support determined by the model for the five census blocks in
this project is $7,978.12. This amounts to a total of $79,781.20 over the 10-year term of support. The
applicant has requested a total of $77,000 in support to serve these five census blocks—which is below
the $79,781.20 determined by the model.
Total Eligible Locations To Be Served
Each applicant must provide the total number of eligible locations for each bid it submits.
Applicants should consult the list released by the Bureau on July 25, 2014 to ascertain the number of
eligible locations determined by the model for each of the census blocks on which it bids.29 For funding
category one and two bids, an applicant’s total support requested will be divided by the number of eligible
locations it proposes to serve30 and will be compared to the model-determined support divided by the
number of eligible locations for the same census blocks to calculate the cost-effectiveness of a specific
bid. The sample bid form below provides further guidance.
Total number of eligible locations
in these five census
In this example, the applicant has requested a total of $77,000 in support to serve these 79 eligible
locations, while the model-determined support to serve the same 79 locations over the 10-year term is
$79,781.20. The applicant’s cost-effectiveness score for such a proposal would be .965.31
We remind applicants that they are required to serve the total number of price cap
locations in the census blocks on which they bid, which may be more than the number of locations that
are eligible for funding. However, their total requested support will be divided only by the number of
29 See id.
30 See supra note 27.
31 (77,000 ÷ 79) ÷ (79,781.20 ÷ 79) = .965. This score will be calculated by the FCC Auction System software. See
infra paras. 62-63.
eligible locations in the census blocks on which they bid in order to compare that support to the support
determined by the model for those same eligible locations. 32
Total Extremely High-Cost Locations To Be Served
Pursuant to the Rural Broadband Experiments Order, each applicant must provide the
total number of extremely high-cost locations for each funding category three bid it submits.33 Applicants
should consult the census block list released by the Bureau to ascertain the number of extremely high-cost
locations determined by the model for each of the census blocks on which it bids.34 An applicant’s
category three bid total support requested will be divided by the number of extremely high-cost locations
it proposes to serve to calculate the total cost per location of a specific bid, with the lowest cost per
location bids selected. The sample bid form below provides further guidance.
Total number of extremely high-cost
locations in these three
In this example, the applicant has requested a total of $180,000 in support to serve these 9 extremely
high-cost locations. The applicant’s total cost per location for such a proposal would be $20,000.35
We also note that a number of the census blocks eligible for rural broadband experiment
funding are “split” blocks that contain both eligible high-cost locations and extremely high-cost locations.
Pursuant to the Rural Broadband Experiments Order, entities selected to receive rural broadband
experiment funding must commit to serve the total number of price cap locations in each block for which
they receive funding.36 However, the cost-effectiveness score for applicants whose bids contain “split”
census blocks will be calculated using not only the number of eligible locations they propose to serve, but
also the number of extremely high-cost locations in those “split” census blocks. Applicants are reminded
that they must include both the eligible locations and extremely high-cost locations in these blocks on
their bid forms. The sample bid form below provides further guidance.
32 See supra note 27.
33 Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 37.
34 See Rural Broadband Experiments Eligible Areas PN.
35 180,000 ÷ 9 = 20,000.
36 Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 15. This includes not only eligible locations and
extremely high-cost locations, but also any low-cost locations (i.e., locations for which the model calculates an
average cost below the funding threshold).
Two “split” census blocks
are part of
locations in these “split”
In this example, the applicant has requested a total of $90,000 in support to serve these five census
Of these five census blocks, two are “split” census blocks that contain both eligible locations and
extremely high-cost locations; there are 15 eligible locations in the five census blocks combined, and
seven extremely high-cost locations in the two “split” census blocks combined. The model-determined
support to serve these same five census blocks over the 10 year term is $91,639.40. The applicant’s cost-
effectiveness score for such a proposal would be .670.37
Finally, we also permit applicants seeking support in funding categories one or two to
increase the cost-effectiveness score of their bids by committing, to the extent they determine it is
economically feasible to do so, to serve locations in adjacent extremely high-cost census blocks (which
receive no model-based support) and to add these locations to their bids. An applicant is not required to
serve all the extremely high-cost locations in this adjacent census block; it may opt to serve a subset of
the total number of extremely high-cost location. If an applicant decides to do so, it must list the CBFIPS
of the adjacent census block in which the extremely high-cost locations are located. The sample bid form
below provides further guidance.
high-cost census block.
In this example, the applicant has requested a total of $77,000 to serve 79 eligible locations and five
extremely high-cost locations.38 The model-determined support to serve these six census blocks over the
10-year term is $79,781.20. The applicant’s cost-effectiveness score for this proposal would be .908.39
37 (90,000 ÷ (15+7)) ÷ (91,639.40 ÷ 15) = .670.
38 Note that in census block 020130001001101, there are a total of seven extremely high-cost locations, but the
applicant here has chosen to serve only a subset of those total locations.
Contingent Funding Category Three Bids
Pursuant to the Rural Broadband Experiments Order, each applicant submitting a bid for
a funding category three project must indicate whether that bid is contingent upon the applicant being
selected as a winner for one or more of its funding category one or two project bids.40 To ensure that
Commission staff is able to determine which project bids are contingent, each applicant also must indicate
the bid project ID of the funding category one or two bid upon which its funding category three bid is
contingent. The sample bid forms below provide further guidance.
Funding category three bid is
contingent upon bid project
In this example, the applicant’s funding category three bid (bid project ID 5) is contingent upon the
applicant being selected as a winning bidder for its funding category one bid (bid project ID 1).
Therefore, if the applicant is not selected as a winning bidder for its funding category one bid, its funding
category three bid also will not be selected as a winning bid, regardless of whether that bid is among the
Applicants may list more than one contingent bid project ID. For example, if an
applicant wanted to make its funding category three bid contingent upon winning all of its funding
category one or two bids, it should list the bid project ID for each of those funding category one or two
bids. Applicants for only funding categories one and two projects, applicants for only funding category
three projects, or applicants that do not wish to make their funding category three bids contingent upon
any other bids should enter “None” in this column.
Descriptive Data Forms
Each applicant must upload a completed descriptive data form in .csv file format. The
descriptive data form will be provided by the Bureau prior to the opening of the filing window.41 For
each individual project on which an applicant bids, it will be required to provide: its unique FRN; the
funding category of the specific project; its entity type; its provider type; what type of technology it will
(Continued from previous page)
39 (77,000 ÷ 84) ÷ (79,781.20 ÷ 79) = .908. Note that the addition of the five extremely high-cost locations lowered
this applicant’s cost-effectiveness score from .965 (in footnote 31 above) to .908.
40 Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 37.
41 As noted above, we plan to release a public notice announcing the beginning of the application filing window and
making the bid form and descriptive data form available to applicants. See supra note 8.
use; whether it has already been designated as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) for the
proposed service area that the project covers, and whether, if selected, it will elect to receive 30 percent of
its funding upfront with a commitment to deploy to 25 percent of eligible locations within 15 months.
At the conclusion of its application, each applicant must certify that it meets or will meet
certain threshold requirements. Among other things, an applicant will be required to certify that it is
already designated as an ETC or will seek designation as an ETC; it has available funds for all project
costs that exceed the amount of rural broadband experiment support it may receive; it will offer service in
supported areas at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates for similar service plans offered by voice
and broadband providers in urban areas; and it meets the service requirements for each funding category
in which it submits bids.42 As noted above, submission of a false certification can result in penalties,
including monetary forfeitures, the forfeiture of universal service support, license forfeitures, ineligibility
to participate in future auctions, and/or criminal prosecution. An applicant should take care to review its
resources and its plans before making the required certification and be prepared to document its review, if
Additional Rules and Disclaimers
Section 1.21002 of the Commission’s rules prohibits an applicant from cooperating or
collaborating with any other applicant with respect to its own, or one another’s, or any other competing
applicant’s bids or bidding strategies, and from communicating with any other applicant in any manner
the substance of its own, or one another’s, or any other competing applicant’s bids or bidding strategies.
Applicants for the rural broadband experiments must comply with section 1.21002 after the deadline for
submitting applications to participate, unless such applicants are members of a joint bidding arrangement
identified on their application. Following review of the submitted bids, the Bureau will release a public
notice announcing the winning bidders and beginning the post-selection review process; winning bidders
will then have 10 business days to provide certain financial and technical materials.43 Therefore,
prohibited communications may not occur beginning October 14, 2014 through the date by which
winning bidders must submit the required financial and technical materials.
Entities Subject to Rule on Prohibited Communications
Section 1.21002’s prohibition on certain communications will apply to any applicant
participating in the rural broadband experiments.44 Thus, unless applicants have identified each other on
their applications as parties with whom they have entered into agreements under section 1.21001(b)(3),
applicants must affirmatively avoid all communications with or disclosures to each other that affect or
have the potential to affect bids or bidding strategy during the application submission window.45
42 See Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at paras. 26-29.
43 See infra para. 68.
44 Section 1.21002 defines “applicant” broadly to include the applicant, each party capable of controlling the
applicant, including all officers and directors, and each party that may be controlled by the applicant or by a party
capable of controlling the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.21002(a).
45 Individuals and entities subject to section 1.21002 should take special care in circumstances where their officers,
directors and employees may receive information directly or indirectly relating to any competing applicant’s bids or
bidding strategies. For example, when an individual serves as an officer for two or more applicants, the bids and
bidding strategies of one applicant are conveyed to the other applicant, and, absent a disclosed bidding agreement,
an apparent violation of the rule prohibiting certain communications occurs. See, e.g., Letter to Colby M. May,
Rural broadband experiment applicants are encouraged not to designate as their
authorized bidder the same individual that another applicant has designated as its authorized bidder. A
violation of section 1.21002 could occur if an individual acts as the authorized bidder for two or more
competing applicants, and conveys information concerning the substance of bids or bidding strategies
between such applicants. Also, if the authorized bidders are different individuals employed by the same
organization (e.g., a law firm or engineering firm or consulting firm), a violation similarly could occur.
Applicants must not communicate directly or indirectly about bids or bidding strategy to
other applicants in this auction. Section 1.21002 prohibits not only communication about an applicant’s
own bids or bidding strategy, but also communication of another applicant’s bids or bidding strategy.46
While section 1.21002 does not prohibit non-auction-related business negotiations among auction
applicants, applicants must ensure that they do not directly or indirectly communicate information that
affects, or could affect, bids or bidding strategy.
Applicants are cautioned that the Commission remains vigilant about prohibited
communications taking place outside of the auction itself. For example, the Commission has warned that
prohibited “communications concerning bids and bidding strategies may include communications
regarding capital calls or requests for additional funds in support of bids or bidding strategies to the extent
such communications convey information concerning the bids and bidding strategies directly or
indirectly.”47 Applicants also should use caution in their dealings with parties such as members of the
press, financial analysts, or others who might become conduits for the communication of prohibited
bidding information. An applicant’s public statement of intent not to participate in the rural broadband
experiments could also violate the rule. Applicants are hereby placed on notice that public disclosure of
information relating to bids, bidding strategies, or post-auction market structures may violate section
Disclosure of Bidding Agreements and Arrangements
The Commission’s rules do not prohibit applicants from entering into otherwise lawful
bidding agreements before filing their applications, as long as they disclose the existence of the
agreement(s) in their applications.48 Applicants must identify in their applications all parties with whom
they have entered into any agreements, arrangements, or understandings of any kind relating to the rural
broadband experiment support.49
If parties agree in principle on all material terms prior to the application filing deadline,
each party to the agreement must identify the other party or parties to the agreement on its application,
even if the agreement has not been reduced to writing.50 If the parties have not agreed in principle by the
(Continued from previous page)
TCCSA, Inc., d/b/a Trinity Broadcasting Network, from Barbara A. Kreisman, Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau, and Margaret W. Wiener, Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau, DA 05-2445, 20 FCC Rcd 14648 (Media Bur. and Wireless Telecom. Bur. 2005).
46 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.21002(b). See also Notice of Apparent [L]iability for Forfeiture of Western PCS BTA 1 Corp.,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 99-385, 14 FCC Rcd 21571, 21574 para. 8 (1999).
47 Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act – Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 94-295, 9 FCC Rcd 7684, 7689 para. 12 (1994) (“Competitive Bidding
Memorandum Opinion and Order”).
48 47 C.F.R. § 1.21001(b)(3)-(4).
49 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.21001(b)(3)-(4), 1.21002.
50 47 C.F.R. § 1.21001(b)(3).
application deadline, they should not include the names of parties to discussions on their applications, and
they may not continue negotiation, discussion or communication with any other applicants after the
By electronically submitting an application, each applicant for the rural broadband
experiments certifies its compliance with sections 1.21001(b)(3) and 1.21002.52 In particular, an
applicant certifies under penalty of perjury that the application discloses all real parties in interest to any
agreements involving participation in the rural broadband experiments, and that it and all applicable
parties have complied with and will continue to comply with 47 C.F.R. § 1.21002.53
The Bureau cautions, however, that such certification will neither outweigh specific
evidence that a prohibited communication has occurred, nor will it preclude the initiation of an
investigation when warranted.54 The Commission has stated that it “intend[s] to scrutinize carefully any
instances in which bidding patterns suggest that collusion may be occurring.”55 Any applicant found to
have violated section 1.21001(b)(4) and (5) may be subject to sanctions.56
Reporting Prohibited Communications
Section 1.21002(c) provides that any applicant that makes or receives a communication
that appears to violate section 1.21002 must report such communication in writing to the Commission
immediately, and in no case later than five business days after the communication occurs.57 An applicant
is therefore required to report to the Commission any communication it has made to or received from
another applicant during the application window that affects or has the potential to affect bids or bidding
strategy, unless such communication is made to or received from a party to an agreement identified under
section 1.21001(b)(4).58 An applicant’s obligation to make such a report continues until the report has
A party reporting any prohibited communication pursuant to sections 1.65, 1.21001(b), or
1.21002(c) must take care to ensure that any report of the prohibited communication does not itself give
rise to a violation of section 1.21002.60 For example, a party’s report of a prohibited communication
could violate the rule by communicating prohibited information to other applicants through the use of
Commission filing procedures that would allow such materials to be made available for public inspection.
Parties must file only a single report concerning a prohibited communication and must
file that report with Commission personnel expressly charged with administering the Commission’s
51 See “Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Clarifies Spectrum Auction Anti-Collusion Rules,” Public Notice, DA
95-2244, 11 FCC Rcd 9645, 9646 (Wireless Telecom. Bur. 1995) (“Anti-Collusion Public Notice”).
52 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.21001(b)(3), 1.21002.
53 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.21001(b)(4)-(5), 1.21002.
54 Nevada Wireless Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11978 para. 13.
55 Competitive Bidding Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 7689, para. 12.
56 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.2109(d).
57 47 C.F.R. § 1.21002(c); see also Part 1 Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 17553-55 paras. 13-17.
58 See Part 1 Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 17550-51, para. 9.
59 47 C.F.R. § 1.21002(c).
60 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.65, 1.21001(b)(3)-(5), 1.21002.
auctions.61 This rule is designed to minimize the risk of inadvertent dissemination of information in such
reports. For the rural broadband experiments, such reports, required by section 1.21002(c), must be filed
by the most expeditious means available. Any such report should be submitted by e-mail to the following
e-mail address: email@example.com. Alternatively, parties may submit a report in hard copy; hard
copy reports must be delivered only to: Alexander Minard, Deputy Division Chief, Telecommunications
Access and Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street, SW, Room 5-B442, Washington, DC 20554.
Parties interested in participating in the rural broadband experiments must familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s general universal service rules, contained in 47 C.F.R. Part 54.
Potential applicants should also familiarize themselves with the Commission’s decisions in both the Tech
Transitions Order and Rural Broadband Experiments Order,62 as well as the competitive bidding rules for
universal service support contained in 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.21000 – 1.21004, to the extent they have not been
modified for the rural broadband experiments, and the procedures, terms, and conditions contained in this
Public Notice and any subsequent public notices relating to participation in the rural broadband
experiments. The terms contained in the Commission’s rules, relevant orders, and public notices are not
negotiable. It is the responsibility of all applicants to remain current with all Commission rules and with
all public notices pertaining to the rural broadband experiments. The Bureau will issue public notices to
convey any new or supplemental information to applicants.
Applicants should be aware that the rural broadband experiments represent an
opportunity to apply for universal service support, subject to certain conditions and regulations. The rural
broadband experiments do not constitute an endorsement by the FCC of any particular service,
technology, or product, nor does rural broadband experiment support constitute a guarantee of business
The Bureau reminds each potential applicant that it has sole responsibility for
investigating and evaluating all technical and marketplace factors that may have a bearing on the level of
support it submits as a bid in its rural broadband experiment application. Each bidder is responsible for
assuring that, if it is selected to receive support, it will be able to build and operate facilities in accordance
with the rural broadband experiment obligations and the Commission’s rules generally, as well as any
federal and state statutes to which it may be subject, even if not detailed in this Public Notice.63 An
applicant should perform its due diligence research and technical analyses before proceeding, as it would
with any new business venture. Each potential applicant should assure itself that, should it become a
winning bidder for rural broadband experiment support, it will be able to build and operate facilities that
will fully comply with all applicable technical and legal requirements.
The Bureau strongly encourages each applicant to conduct its own research prior to
applying for rural broadband experiment support in order to determine the existence of pending
61 Part 1 Procedural Amendments Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 522 para. 4. This process differs from filing procedures
used in connection with other Commission rules and processes which may call for submission of filings to the
Commission’s Office of the Secretary or ECFS. Filing through the Office of Secretary or ECFS could allow the
report to become publicly available and might result in the communication of prohibited information to other
62 See Technology Transitions et al., GN Docket No. 13-5 et al., Order et al., 29 FCC Rcd 1433, 1462-79, paras. 82-
136, 1498-1504, paras. 202-23 (2014) (Tech Transitions Order); Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98.
63 For example, certain recipients may be required to comply with the Commission’s rules regarding implementation
of the National Environmental Policy Act and other federal environmental statutes. See 47 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart I.
administrative or judicial proceedings that might affect its decision to participate. The Bureau also
reminds each applicant that pending and future judicial proceedings, as well as certain pending and future
proceedings before the Commission – including applications, applications for modification, petitions for
rulemaking, requests for special temporary authority, waiver requests, petitions to deny, petitions for
reconsideration, informal objections, and applications for review – may affect applicants intending to
participate in the rural broadband experiments. Each prospective applicant is responsible for assessing
the likelihood of the various possible outcomes and for considering the potential impact on rural
broadband experiment support available through this auction.
The due diligence considerations mentioned in this Public Notice do not comprise an
exhaustive list of steps that should be undertaken prior to participating in the rural broadband
experiments. Each applicant is solely responsible for identifying associated risks and for investigating
and evaluating the degree to which such matters may affect its ability to bid on or otherwise receive rural
broadband experiment support. Each applicant is responsible for undertaking research to ensure that any
support awarded will be suitable for its business plans and needs. Each applicant must undertake its own
assessment of the relevance and importance of information gathered as part of its due diligence efforts.
The Commission makes no representations or guarantees regarding the accuracy or
completeness of information in its databases or any third party databases, including, for example, court
docketing systems. To the extent the Commission’s databases may not include all information deemed
necessary or desirable by an applicant, it must obtain or verify such information from independent sources
or assume the risk of any incompleteness or inaccuracy in said databases. Furthermore, the Commission
makes no representations or guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of information that has
been provided by incumbent licensees and incorporated into its databases.
As is the case with many business investment opportunities, the Bureau warns potential
applicants that some unscrupulous entrepreneurs may attempt to use the rural broadband experiments to
deceive and defraud unsuspecting investors. Information about deceptive telemarketing investment
schemes is available from the FCC as well as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Additional sources of information for potential bidders and investors may
be obtained from the following sources:
the FCC’s Consumer Call Center at (888) 225-5322 or by visiting
the FTC at (877) FTC-HELP ((877) 382-4357) or by visiting
the SEC at (202) 942-7040 or by visiting
Complaints about specific deceptive telemarketing investment schemes should be directed to the FTC, the
SEC, or the National Fraud Information Center at (800) 876-7060.
Compliance with Antitrust Laws
We also remind applicants that, regardless of compliance with the Commission’s rules,
applicants remain subject to the antitrust laws, which are designed to prevent anticompetitive behavior in
the marketplace.64 Compliance with the disclosure requirements of section 1.21002 will not insulate a
64 See Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission’s Rules – Competitive Bidding Procedures, WT Docket No. 97-82,
Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 99-384, 14 FCC Rcd 21558, 21560-61 para. 4 & n.17 (1999)
(quoting Competitive Bidding Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 7689 para. 12) (“[W]e wish to
emphasize that all applicants and their owners continue to be subject to existing antitrust laws. Applicants should
party from enforcement of the antitrust laws.65 For instance, a violation of the antitrust laws could arise
out of actions taking place well before any party submitted an application.66
To the extent the Commission becomes aware of specific allegations that suggest that
violations of the federal antitrust laws may have occurred, the Commission may refer such allegations to
the United States Department of Justice for investigation.67 If an applicant is found to have violated the
antitrust laws or the Commission’s rules in connection with its participation in the rural broadband
experiment application process, it may be subject to a forfeiture and may be prohibited from participating
in future auctions, among other sanctions.68
Commission Red Light Rules
Applications to participate in the rural broadband experiments are subject to the
Commission’s rules regarding an applicant with delinquent debts, often referred to as the Commission
Red Light Rules. Unless otherwise expressly provided for, the Commission will withhold action on an
application by any entity found to be delinquent in its debt to the Commission as defined by the Red Light
Rule.69 Accordingly, parties interested in filing applications to participate in the rural broadband
experiments should review the status of any debts that they owe the Commission before submitting their
application and resolve any delinquent debts. The Commission maintains a Red Light Display System
(RLD) to enable entities doing business with the FCC to determine if they have any outstanding
delinquent debt. The RLD enables a party to check the status of its account by individual FCC
Registration Numbers (FRNs), and links other FRNs sharing the same Tax Identification Number (TIN)
when determining whether there are outstanding delinquent debts. The RLD is available at
https://www.fcc.gov/redlight/. Additional information is available at
The Commission’s rules provide for the debarment of those convicted of or found civilly
liable for defrauding the high-cost support program.70 Applicants are reminded that those rules apply with
equal force to the rural broadband experiments.
(Continued from previous page)
note that conduct that is permissible under the Commission's Rules may be prohibited by the antitrust laws.”);
Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act – Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253,
Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 94-264, 9 FCC Rcd 6858, 6869 n.134 (1994)(“[A]pplicants will also
be subject to existing antitrust laws.”) (“Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order”).
65 See Competitive Bidding Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 7689 para. 12. See also “Justice
Department Sues Three Firms Over FCC Auction Practices,” Press Release 98-536 (DOJ Nov. 10, 1998).
66 See, e.g., Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 6869 n.134. The Commission has cited a
number of examples of potentially anticompetitive actions that would be prohibited under antitrust laws: for
example, actual or potential competitors may not agree to divide territories in order to minimize competition,
regardless of whether they split a market in which they both do business, or whether they merely reserve one market
for one and another market for the other. Id.
67 See Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 2388, para. 226.
68 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2109(d); see also Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 2388, para.
69 47 C.F.R. § 1.1910(b)(2).
70 47 C.F.R. § 54.8.
SELECTION METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS
The most cost-effective proposals will be selected from each funding category.
Applicants are encouraged to review the Rural Broadband Experiments Order for greater detail on the
Winning Bids Selection Process
To select winning bidders, the FCC Auction System will rank bids from the most cost-
effective to the least-cost effective within each funding category. For bidders claiming eligibility for a
Tribal bidding credit, the auction system will reduce the Tribal entity’s requested support amount per
location by 25 percent for the purpose of comparing it to other bids, as described above.72
The most cost-effective bids will be selected for funding until the budget for each specific
funding category is exhausted. In the event we do not exhaust the entire budget for a particular funding
category due to per-project or per-entity funding limits or insufficient amounts remaining in the budget to
fund the next ranked project, we will not roll over any unused funds into the next category. The Bureau
will announce the results by public notice and begin the challenge process described below. The Bureau
also will release the formal proposals submitted by all winning bidders.
In the Tech Transitions Order, the Commission reiterated its commitment to ensuring that
Connect America funding is not used in areas where other providers are offering voice and broadband
service meeting the Commission’s service requirements.73 For administrative efficiency, it concluded that
challenges to the eligibility of areas proposed for experiments would be entertained after projects have
been tentatively selected for funding.74
This challenge process would focus on whether an area that a
winning bidder proposed to serve with rural broadband experiment funding was actually already served
by an unsubsidized competitor, and therefore ineligible for support.
The Phase II challenge process is currently ongoing, and the list of census blocks
presumptively eligible for Phase II funding includes all of the census blocks eligible for rural broadband
experiment funding. Any party that believes a block on that list is in fact served by an unsubsidized
competitor presumably has filed a challenge to that block.75 Given that the Phase II challenge process is
occurring so close in time to the rural broadband experiments auction, we now conclude that it would be
inefficient to conduct another challenge process just two months later, for the winning bidders of the rural
broadband experiments. We conclude that the Commission’s intent that there be a challenge process for
the rural broadband experiments will be best served by reviewing the existing Phase II challenges and
resolving expeditiously, on the existing record, any challenges to the blocks of winning bidders.
Therefore, we will review the challenges and responses received in the Phase II challenge process to
71 See Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at paras. 30-44.
72 See supra para. 27.
73 See Tech Transitions Order, 29 FCC Rcd at 1473, para. 113.
75 Phase II challenges were due on August 14, 2014. Based on preliminary review, parties have contested the status
of approximately 34,000 census blocks as unserved, contending those blocks in fact are served by an unsubsidized
competitor and therefore ineligible for Phase II support.
determine whether a census block or blocks that a winning bidder proposed to serve should be deemed
ineligible for rural broadband experiment funding. We encourage potential applicants to review the Phase
II challenge process to determine which, if any, census blocks they are interested in serving are subject to
challenges.76 In the event that census blocks are deemed ineligible for rural broadband experiment
funding, support for any project selected for funding that includes such census blocks will be adjusted
For a census block to be considered “served” by an unsubsidized competitor,78 a provider
must offer voice service and broadband service with speeds of at least 4 Mbps downstream/1 Mbps
upstream. Additionally, the service must provide a minimum usage allowance of at least 100 GB/month,
round trip provider network latency of 100 ms or less,79 and pricing reasonably comparable to that in
urban areas. An unsubsidized competitor may offer a variety of service plans to consumers with different
performance metrics, but the consumer must be able to purchase at least one plan that meets or exceeds
all the minimum performance criteria and complies with the pricing requirement.80
The Bureau will conduct a review of each winning bidder to determine whether it has
demonstrated the technical and financial qualifications to successfully complete its proposed project
within the required timeframes and is in compliance with all statutory and regulatory requirements for the
universal service support that it seeks. Commission staff will perform a review to ensure that the selected
applicants meet our expectations for technical and financial capability to conduct an experiment before
any support is provided. The Bureau will issue a public notice establishing the specific deadline for
winning bidders to submit the financial and technical documentation described below. Winning bidders
will use FCC Form 5620 and the FCC Auction System to submit this documentation. Details regarding
the submission and processing of this documentation will be provided in a public notice after the close of
Required Disclosures and Documentation
Financial and Technical Materials
Within 10 business days of the public notice announcing the winning bidders and
establishing post-selection review deadlines for winning bidders, winning bidders must provide the most
recent three consecutive years of audited financial statements, including balance sheets, income
76 The Bureau currently is reviewing the challenges filed in the Phase II process and expects in the weeks ahead to
release a public notice listing the challenges that make a prima facie case, with responses to the challenges due 45
days after that public notice. That public notice will be available at https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/connect-
77 See Rural Broadband Experiments Order, FCC 14-98, at para. 51.
78 An unsubsidized competitor is a facilities-based provider that does not receive high-cost support and is providing
residential fixed voice and broadband service meeting defined characteristics to that census block.
79 The network round trip latency is the time it takes for a signal to travel from the customer premises to the closest
designated Internet core peering interconnection point (often referred to as an Internet Exchange Point or IXP) and
back to the customer premises.
80 For example, an unsubsidized competitor can offer an “economy plan” with speeds of 768 kbps downstream, 50
GB usage allowance, and latency of 200 ms, but also must offer a plan with speeds of at least 4 Mbps/1 Mbps, usage
allowance of at least 100 GB/month, and latency no greater than 100 ms, at a price that is reasonably comparable to
similar wireline services in urban areas.
statement, and statement of cash flow, and submit a description of the technology and system design that
will be used to deliver voice and broadband service, including a network diagram, which must be certified
by a professional engineer.81
Winning bidders proposing to use wireless technologies also must provide a
description of spectrum access82 requirements, such as licensed, unlicensed, or a combination thereof,
including frequency bands and necessary bandwidths, for the areas for which they seek support.
Letter of Credit Commitment Letter
Within 60 days of the public notice establishing post-selection review deadlines for
winning bidders, winning bidders must submit a letter from an acceptable bank committing to issue an
irrevocable stand-by original letter of credit (LOC) in the amount of the winning bid to that entity.83 The
commitment letter must, at a minimum, provide the dollar amount of the LOC and the issuing bank’s
agreement to follow the terms and conditions of the Commission’s model LOC, found in Appendix A of
the Rural Broadband Experiments Order.84 The commitment letter must be from an acceptable bank, as
defined in the Rural Broadband Experiments Order.85
Documentation of ETC Designation
Within 90 days of the public notice establishing post-selection review deadlines for
winning bidders, winning bidders must submit appropriate documentation of its ETC designation in all of
the areas for which it will receive support and certify that that the information submitted is accurate.86
Appropriate documentation should include the original designation order, any relevant modifications, e.g.,
expansion of service area or inclusion of wireless technologies, along with any name-change orders.
Letter of Credit and Bankruptcy Code Opinion Letter
Once the Bureau has determined that the winning bidder is financially and technically
qualified to receive experiment support and that the LOC commitment letter is sufficient, it will release a
public notice stating that the entity is ready to be authorized for support. Within 10 business days of the
public notice, the winning bidder must submit an irrevocable stand-by original LOC that has been issued
and signed by the issuing bank. Specific requirements for the LOCs are outlined in the Rural Broadband
Experiments Order.87 Winning bidders must also provide an opinion letter from legal counsel that must
clearly state, subject only to customary assumptions, limitations, and qualifications, that in a proceeding
under the Bankruptcy Code, the bankruptcy court would not treat the LOC or proceeds of the LOC as
81 See id. at para. 54.
82 See Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 26 FCC Rcd 17663, 17741-47, paras. 393-99 (2011) (USF/ICC Transformation Order), aff’d
sub nom. In re FCC 11-161, 753 F.3d 1015 (10th Cir. May 23, 2014).
83 Any Tribal Nation or Tribally-owned or -controlled applicant for the rural broadband experiments that is unable to
obtain a LOC may file a petition for a waiver of the LOC requirement. See Rural Broadband Experiments Order,
FCC 14-98, at paras. 67-68.
84 See id. at App. A.
85 See id. at paras. 59-61.
86 The Commission expected that winning bidders would able to confirm their ETC status within 90 days of the
public notice announcing the winning bidders. A winning bidder may file for a waiver of this deadline if it is able to
demonstrate that it has engaged in good faith to obtain ETC designation, but has not received approval within the
90-day timeframe. See id. at para. 22. An entity is presumed to have shown good faith if it files its ETC application
within 15 days of release of the public notice announcing the winning bidders. See id. at para. 22, n.52.
87 See id. at paras. 55-57.
property of the account party’s bankruptcy estate, or the bankruptcy estate of any other rural broadband
experiment recipient-related entity requesting issuance of the LOC under section 541 of the Bankruptcy
Contact Information Table:
Wireline Competition Bureau
Telecommunications Access Policy Division
FCC Auctions Technical Support Hotline
FCC Auction System (Hardware/Software
(202) 414-1255 (TTY)
Hours of service: 8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday
FCC Copy Contractor
Best Copy and Printing, Inc
Additional Copies of
445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402
Washington, DC 20554
(800) 418-3676 (outside Washington, DC)
(202) 418-3676 (in the Washington area)
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
Braille, large print, electronic files, or
(202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY)
audio format for people with disabilities
Office of Communications Business
Additional information for small and
Office of Native Affairs and Policy
Additional information for entities seeking to provide
service to Tribal lands and Tribal governments
88 11 U.S.C. § 541.
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.